t**y
发帖数: 462 | 1 版本太多了
KJV
NKJV
ASV
NET
??
Thanks. |
l*****d
发帖数: 754 | 2 ASV (american stardard version) is a good one, known for very
accurate translation. First published in 1901.
But nowadays a lot of ppl are using NIV (new international version).
Maybe because it is closer to nowadays English.
【在 t**y 的大作中提到】
: 版本太多了
: KJV
: NKJV
: ASV
: NET
: ??
: Thanks.
|
t**y
发帖数: 462 | 3 Thanks.
I believe there are a lot of mis-translation from the orginal bible to what
we saw today, especially in Chinese version. I've been seeing so many
Chinese Christians 断章取义，咬文嚼字，almost nothing convincing.
【在 l*****d 的大作中提到】
: ASV (american stardard version) is a good one, known for very
: accurate translation. First published in 1901.
: But nowadays a lot of ppl are using NIV (new international version).
: Maybe because it is closer to nowadays English.
|
l*****d
发帖数: 754 | 4 You are welcome.
It is always good to read English (if not Greek 8-)) bible in
addition to Chinese one.
what
【在 t**y 的大作中提到】
: Thanks.
: I believe there are a lot of mis-translation from the orginal bible to what
: we saw today, especially in Chinese version. I've been seeing so many
: Chinese Christians 断章取义，咬文嚼字，almost nothing convincing.
|
p********g
发帖数: 41 | |
k*********d
发帖数: 841 | |
j*****7
发帖数: 10575 | 7 圣经的翻译，大体上有两个方向
直译（最大程度尊重原文的词句顺序，尽量少的加入翻译者自己的意见）
意译（和上面的相反）
直译的好处在于，客观认识圣经原来的意思，缺点在于不宜阅读
意译同上相反
每一本译本都是介于以上两个原则之间找到一个平衡点
NIV比较意译，所以读起来顺口，但是可能有一些翻译者的解释
ASV(NASV)则比较直译
看你的需要把。如果是初信主，可以先看NIV，对圣经有个大概的了解。有点基础后，
可以看NASV加深认识。
【在 t**y 的大作中提到】
: 版本太多了
: KJV
: NKJV
: ASV
: NET
: ??
: Thanks.
|
d********e
发帖数: 4 | 8 如果从销售额来看， 无论是销售金额还是数量， 都是NIV， KJV， NKJV排在前三位。
个人比较推荐NIV。 |
