S*********g 发帖数: 24893 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
发信人: StephenKing (88), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: yourtt被我发现是低薪无房男以后
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Nov 13 18:18:34 2010, 美东)
就不太啃声了
不过我还是没搞懂
一个收入不过5万的苦孩子,为什么像疯了一样,反对奥巴马给25万的家庭增税。 |
d****i 发帖数: 4354 | 2 给收入25万以上家庭增税后,收入不过5万的人更可能失去工作。
此外,一个时刻盯着别人钱袋的家伙和一个尊重别人劳动所得的人比,谁更象疯狗?
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】 : 发信人: StephenKing (88), 信区: SanFrancisco : 标 题: yourtt被我发现是低薪无房男以后 : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Nov 13 18:18:34 2010, 美东) : 就不太啃声了 : 不过我还是没搞懂 : 一个收入不过5万的苦孩子,为什么像疯了一样,反对奥巴马给25万的家庭增税。
|
O*****g 发帖数: 1257 | 3 这么简单的事,你还没搞懂说明你笨呗。
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】 : 发信人: StephenKing (88), 信区: SanFrancisco : 标 题: yourtt被我发现是低薪无房男以后 : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Nov 13 18:18:34 2010, 美东) : 就不太啃声了 : 不过我还是没搞懂 : 一个收入不过5万的苦孩子,为什么像疯了一样,反对奥巴马给25万的家庭增税。
|
T**********1 发帖数: 2406 | 4 You are poor so you should rob and steal?
Sooner or later you will pay the price.
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】 : 发信人: StephenKing (88), 信区: SanFrancisco : 标 题: yourtt被我发现是低薪无房男以后 : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Nov 13 18:18:34 2010, 美东) : 就不太啃声了 : 不过我还是没搞懂 : 一个收入不过5万的苦孩子,为什么像疯了一样,反对奥巴马给25万的家庭增税。
|
y****t 发帖数: 10233 | 5 屎坑哥已经疯掉了.
lol...
【在 d****i 的大作中提到】 : 给收入25万以上家庭增税后,收入不过5万的人更可能失去工作。 : 此外,一个时刻盯着别人钱袋的家伙和一个尊重别人劳动所得的人比,谁更象疯狗?
|
S*********g 发帖数: 24893 | 6 我发现你的套套是买提一小撮无钱无房的中国籍共和党的精神领袖
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】 : 发信人: StephenKing (88), 信区: SanFrancisco : 标 题: yourtt被我发现是低薪无房男以后 : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Nov 13 18:18:34 2010, 美东) : 就不太啃声了 : 不过我还是没搞懂 : 一个收入不过5万的苦孩子,为什么像疯了一样,反对奥巴马给25万的家庭增税。
|
L*******r 发帖数: 8961 | 7 为什么?
【在 d****i 的大作中提到】 : 给收入25万以上家庭增税后,收入不过5万的人更可能失去工作。 : 此外,一个时刻盯着别人钱袋的家伙和一个尊重别人劳动所得的人比,谁更象疯狗?
|
T**********1 发帖数: 2406 | 8 Higher tax leads to lower savings, lower savings leads to lower investment, leads to lower jobs position creations,
leads to higher unemployment for lower skill
labors.
【在 L*******r 的大作中提到】 : 为什么?
|
B**W 发帖数: 2273 | 9 Alternatively, the equation might be:
Higher tax leads to lower savings for middle-upper, leads to more saving and
more government benefit for middle-lower, leads to less speculation on the
market, leads to more real consumption, leads to more "real" demand (of
course, not demand for "financial services" provided by Investment Banks),
leads to more business opportunities, leads to more job creations.
It seems nobody knows where the equilibrium point is. But the coin
absolutely has two sides.
, leads to lower jobs position creations,
【在 T**********1 的大作中提到】 : Higher tax leads to lower savings, lower savings leads to lower investment, leads to lower jobs position creations, : leads to higher unemployment for lower skill : labors.
|
L****l 发帖数: 594 | 10 Insightful.
and
the
【在 B**W 的大作中提到】 : Alternatively, the equation might be: : Higher tax leads to lower savings for middle-upper, leads to more saving and : more government benefit for middle-lower, leads to less speculation on the : market, leads to more real consumption, leads to more "real" demand (of : course, not demand for "financial services" provided by Investment Banks), : leads to more business opportunities, leads to more job creations. : It seems nobody knows where the equilibrium point is. But the coin : absolutely has two sides. : : , leads to lower jobs position creations,
|
|
|
w********h 发帖数: 12367 | 11 真的啊。。。
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 我发现你的套套是买提一小撮无钱无房的中国籍共和党的精神领袖
|
f*******u 发帖数: 2018 | 12 就冲你这个问题,就说明你1,比较年轻,2。比较liberal
其实政府收税是把private sector的钱抽出来分配,政府的分配是臭名昭著的差劲,这
样本来私营企业的投资都被和谐掉了
【在 L*******r 的大作中提到】 : 为什么?
|
y****t 发帖数: 10233 | 13 他要是不骂骂儿子打老子,他心里能平衡吗...
嘿嘿...
【在 w********h 的大作中提到】 : 真的啊。。。
|
T**********1 发帖数: 2406 | 14 How does tax leads to more savings for middle-lower?
How does more real consumption leads to more business without capital and
investment?
Your want me to work more so you can consume more, right?
and
the
【在 B**W 的大作中提到】 : Alternatively, the equation might be: : Higher tax leads to lower savings for middle-upper, leads to more saving and : more government benefit for middle-lower, leads to less speculation on the : market, leads to more real consumption, leads to more "real" demand (of : course, not demand for "financial services" provided by Investment Banks), : leads to more business opportunities, leads to more job creations. : It seems nobody knows where the equilibrium point is. But the coin : absolutely has two sides. : : , leads to lower jobs position creations,
|
y****t 发帖数: 10233 | 15 hehe...
benefit for middle-lower...
they have the benefit to work longer now, since ss age gonna be raised...
【在 T**********1 的大作中提到】 : How does tax leads to more savings for middle-lower? : How does more real consumption leads to more business without capital and : investment? : Your want me to work more so you can consume more, right? : : and : the
|
q******s 发帖数: 7469 | 16 5万收入,去掉401k,就3万多,税律有没有10%?
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 我发现你的套套是买提一小撮无钱无房的中国籍共和党的精神领袖
|
D*****n 发帖数: 363 | 17
Completely liberal bullshit. Government is the biggest squander good at
nothing but managing social security, post office, medicare / medicaid,
fannie fredy and the entire national balance sheet into bankcrucy.
The last thing we need is to give a serial bankcrucy addict any more
money to squander, dumbass.
【在 B**W 的大作中提到】 : Alternatively, the equation might be: : Higher tax leads to lower savings for middle-upper, leads to more saving and : more government benefit for middle-lower, leads to less speculation on the : market, leads to more real consumption, leads to more "real" demand (of : course, not demand for "financial services" provided by Investment Banks), : leads to more business opportunities, leads to more job creations. : It seems nobody knows where the equilibrium point is. But the coin : absolutely has two sides. : : , leads to lower jobs position creations,
|
y****t 发帖数: 10233 | 18 guess he does not even know what is 401k...
【在 q******s 的大作中提到】 : 5万收入,去掉401k,就3万多,税律有没有10%?
|
k********s 发帖数: 320 | 19 not sure I understand the logic behind 'more saving for middle-lower", at
the most it will be the same, why would it be more?
and
the
【在 B**W 的大作中提到】 : Alternatively, the equation might be: : Higher tax leads to lower savings for middle-upper, leads to more saving and : more government benefit for middle-lower, leads to less speculation on the : market, leads to more real consumption, leads to more "real" demand (of : course, not demand for "financial services" provided by Investment Banks), : leads to more business opportunities, leads to more job creations. : It seems nobody knows where the equilibrium point is. But the coin : absolutely has two sides. : : , leads to lower jobs position creations,
|
k********s 发帖数: 320 | 20 harsh wording, but I share the same sentiment.
【在 D*****n 的大作中提到】 : : Completely liberal bullshit. Government is the biggest squander good at : nothing but managing social security, post office, medicare / medicaid, : fannie fredy and the entire national balance sheet into bankcrucy. : The last thing we need is to give a serial bankcrucy addict any more : money to squander, dumbass.
|
|
|
b*********d 发帖数: 3539 | 21 this is where the government tricked. it is supposed to put the money into
schools to reduce the tuition, into the public service so people can spend
money to buy products. most importantly, people feel SAFE so they WILL
consume and invest. read the news, "Survey: 93% of employees would ditch
the holiday party for more money"
but what the government actually does is to bail wall street blood suckers
of those PRIVATE IBs. what their money does is rolling the dice and pull
more money out the pocket from the mid-lower class. with the rest of it,
CEOs buy $1000 bottle wine, which doesn't seem to create as much jobs as if
it's $1000 auto parts or books plus teacher's salary to educate kids.
this is why the right wingers argue that privatization is better than having
a lame, corrupted central distributor.
【在 k********s 的大作中提到】 : not sure I understand the logic behind 'more saving for middle-lower", at : the most it will be the same, why would it be more? : : and : the
|
T**********1 发帖数: 2406 | 22 The middle lower class has no money to be pulled, they are net consumer of
wealth, not creators of wealth.
You are not very smart, are you?
into
if
【在 b*********d 的大作中提到】 : this is where the government tricked. it is supposed to put the money into : schools to reduce the tuition, into the public service so people can spend : money to buy products. most importantly, people feel SAFE so they WILL : consume and invest. read the news, "Survey: 93% of employees would ditch : the holiday party for more money" : but what the government actually does is to bail wall street blood suckers : of those PRIVATE IBs. what their money does is rolling the dice and pull : more money out the pocket from the mid-lower class. with the rest of it, : CEOs buy $1000 bottle wine, which doesn't seem to create as much jobs as if : it's $1000 auto parts or books plus teacher's salary to educate kids.
|
z****0 发帖数: 3942 | 23 人没疯!就是比较有激情而已。
我形容他老人家在茶党版就像进了厕所——屎不可挡,粪勇向前。
我很敬仰啊!
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 我发现你的套套是买提一小撮无钱无房的中国籍共和党的精神领袖
|
y****t 发帖数: 10233 | |
S*********n 发帖数: 4050 | 25 我日,五万。天天研究税率
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 我发现你的套套是买提一小撮无钱无房的中国籍共和党的精神领袖
|
S*********n 发帖数: 4050 | 26 扯鸡巴蛋。美国的税率闯历史新低已经达10年。带来的是什么?
More prosperity disparity, and dwindling middle class
, leads to lower jobs position creations,
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
【在 T**********1 的大作中提到】 : Higher tax leads to lower savings, lower savings leads to lower investment, leads to lower jobs position creations, : leads to higher unemployment for lower skill : labors.
|
S*********n 发帖数: 4050 | 27 别人的劳动所得?
Not so simple. A top company CEO's salary can easily exceeds 1000 times of
that of average worker. In 1965, the difference is around 40. There is no
justification for that. Especially when considering that these fat cats take
no responsibility when they screw up. The have golden parachutes. They rip
off even if when they fail.
They exploited the system to the extreme.
In the past decade, the top 1% was having a good time, while the middle
class income just simply stay flat. With a dwindling middle class, US
economy will stay weak forever.
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
【在 d****i 的大作中提到】 : 给收入25万以上家庭增税后,收入不过5万的人更可能失去工作。 : 此外,一个时刻盯着别人钱袋的家伙和一个尊重别人劳动所得的人比,谁更象疯狗?
|
z****0 发帖数: 3942 | 28 您老怎么发现的?说说看,我等愿闻其详。
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 我发现你的套套是买提一小撮无钱无房的中国籍共和党的精神领袖
|
y****t 发帖数: 10233 | 29 哈哈...
steeldrag,
下面这个才叫真正的智商..
哈哈....
屎坑崽,走了还能玩一批蠢货,也算是mitbbs一绝了.
发信人: zing20 (五湖四海), 信区: USANews
标 题: Re: yourtt被我发现是低薪无房男以后 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Jan 27 20:46:13 2012, 美东)
您老怎么发现的?说说看,我等愿闻其详。
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 我发现你的套套是买提一小撮无钱无房的中国籍共和党的精神领袖
|
z****0 发帖数: 3942 | 30 看看,又不注意身体了吧?什么庸俗帖子都回?人民群众有点低级趣味您要理解。
记住,您的身体不是自个的,是全美Teabagger 共同的宝贵资产。
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】 : 哈哈... : steeldrag, : 下面这个才叫真正的智商.. : 哈哈.... : 屎坑崽,走了还能玩一批蠢货,也算是mitbbs一绝了. : 发信人: zing20 (五湖四海), 信区: USANews : 标 题: Re: yourtt被我发现是低薪无房男以后 (转载) : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Jan 27 20:46:13 2012, 美东) : 您老怎么发现的?说说看,我等愿闻其详。
|
|
|
z****0 发帖数: 3942 | 31 不是共和党,是茶党。
【在 S*********g 的大作中提到】 : 我发现你的套套是买提一小撮无钱无房的中国籍共和党的精神领袖
|
y****t 发帖数: 10233 | 32 嘿,到点了,你该吃药了.
呵呵...
【在 z****0 的大作中提到】 : 不是共和党,是茶党。
|
z****0 发帖数: 3942 | 33 我坚决捍卫您老在这儿现的权利。请继续!
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】 : 嘿,到点了,你该吃药了. : 呵呵...
|
S*********n 发帖数: 4050 | 34 低薪无房难啊
into
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
【在 b*********d 的大作中提到】 : this is where the government tricked. it is supposed to put the money into : schools to reduce the tuition, into the public service so people can spend : money to buy products. most importantly, people feel SAFE so they WILL : consume and invest. read the news, "Survey: 93% of employees would ditch : the holiday party for more money" : but what the government actually does is to bail wall street blood suckers : of those PRIVATE IBs. what their money does is rolling the dice and pull : more money out the pocket from the mid-lower class. with the rest of it, : CEOs buy $1000 bottle wine, which doesn't seem to create as much jobs as if : it's $1000 auto parts or books plus teacher's salary to educate kids.
|
S*********n 发帖数: 4050 | 35 低薪无房难怎么不来驳斥一下?
into
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
【在 b*********d 的大作中提到】 : this is where the government tricked. it is supposed to put the money into : schools to reduce the tuition, into the public service so people can spend : money to buy products. most importantly, people feel SAFE so they WILL : consume and invest. read the news, "Survey: 93% of employees would ditch : the holiday party for more money" : but what the government actually does is to bail wall street blood suckers : of those PRIVATE IBs. what their money does is rolling the dice and pull : more money out the pocket from the mid-lower class. with the rest of it, : CEOs buy $1000 bottle wine, which doesn't seem to create as much jobs as if : it's $1000 auto parts or books plus teacher's salary to educate kids.
|
y****t 发帖数: 10233 | 36 what the fuck,
are you truly that stupid or what?
the money goes to school?
or those fat cats school union boss?
with luxury pensions?
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-10-23/news/ct-met-pensi
or to pay those pure shit can not even be fired?
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/queens/dud_of_the_class_V94X
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/USANews/31331577_0.html
就向往常一样,我答案都写在那里了,libtard就是不看.
我上次让你们学习的waiting for superman, 你们都学习了没有?
【在 S*********n 的大作中提到】 : 低薪无房难怎么不来驳斥一下? : : into : ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
|
z****0 发帖数: 3942 | 37 不要回避问题嘛。
【在 y****t 的大作中提到】 : what the fuck, : are you truly that stupid or what? : the money goes to school? : or those fat cats school union boss? : with luxury pensions? : http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-10-23/news/ct-met-pensi : or to pay those pure shit can not even be fired? : http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/queens/dud_of_the_class_V94X : http://www.mitbbs.com/article/USANews/31331577_0.html : 就向往常一样,我答案都写在那里了,libtard就是不看.
|