l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 共和党主导的下一届众议院将设法阻止非法入境者利用出生公民权获得美国公民身份
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/11/18/3194319/gop-majority-in-house-will-push.html
GOP majority in House will push to end 'birthright citizenship'
By Rob Hotakainen
r*********[email protected]
Published: Thursday, Nov. 18, 2010 - 12:00 am | Page 1A
Last Modified: Thursday, Nov. 18, 2010 - 1:29 pm
WASHINGTON – As one of its first acts, the new Congress will consider
denying
citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants who are born in the United
States.
Those children, who are now automatically granted citizenship at birth, will
be one of the first targets of the Republican-led House when it convenes in
January.
GOP Rep. Steve King of Iowa, the incoming chairman of the subcommittee that
oversees immigration, is expected to push a bill that would deny "birthright
citizenship" to such children.
The measure, assailed by critics as unconstitutional, is an indication of
how
the new majority intends to flex its muscles on the volatile issue of
illegal
immigration.
The idea has a growing list of supporters, including Republican Reps. Tom
McClintock of Elk Grove and Dan Lungren of Gold River, but it has aroused
intense opposition, as well.
"I don't like it," said Chad Silva, statewide policy analyst for the Latino
Coalition for a Healthy California. "It's been something that's been a part
of America for a very long time. … For us, it sort of flies in the face of
what America is about."
Republicans, Silva said, are "going in there and starting to monkey with the
Constitution."
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868, guarantees
citizenship to anyone born or naturalized in the United States. It was
intended to make sure that children of freed slaves were granted U.S.
citizenship.
While opponents say King's bill would clearly be unconstitutional, backers
say the 14th Amendment would not apply. The amendment states that anyone
born
in the United States and "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" is a citizen.
King said the amendment would not apply to the children of illegal
immigrants
because their parents should not be in the country anyway. He said
immigration law should not create incentives for people to enter the country
illegally and that it's creating an "anchor baby industry."
"Many of these illegal aliens are giving birth to children in the United
States so that they can have uninhibited access to taxpayer-funded benefits
and to citizenship for as many family members as possible," King said.
An estimated 340,000 of the 4.3 million babies born in the United States in
2008 were the children of undocumented immigrants, according to an analysis
of Census Bureau data by the Pew Hispanic Center done last year.
The issue is dividing Republicans, too.
"We find both this rhetoric and this unconstitutional conduct reprehensible,
insulting and a poor reflection upon Republicans," DeeDee Blasé, the
founder
of Somos Republicans, a Latino GOP organization based in the Southwestern
states, said in a letter to House Republican leaders.
Silva said the Republican plan is "not the fix," adding that the citizenship
of children born to immigrants was never an issue during the immigration
tide
at the turn of the 20th century and that it shouldn't be now.
"That's our strength," he said. "And to start splitting hairs like that will
only make the immigration issue worse."
Democratic Rep. Doris Matsui of Sacramento called King's plan "both
unconstitutional and shortsighted."
"The 14th Amendment to the Constitution grants American citizenship to
anyone
born on American soil," she said. "I firmly believe we must reform the
current immigration system, but we need to do so comprehensively with
policies that respect our nation's history, strengthen our borders, and help
our economy."
McClintock outlined his position last summer in a rebuttal to a newspaper
editorial: "If illegal immigration is to be rewarded with birthright
citizenship, public benefits and amnesty, it becomes impossible to maintain
our immigration laws and the process of assimilation that they assure," he
wrote.
McClintock noted that the United Kingdom, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand,
France and India have all changed their laws in recent years to require that
at least one parent be a legal resident for the child to become a legal
citizen.
Lungren, who served as California's attorney general from 1990 to 1998
introduced a similar bill in 2007, but it did not pass the House, which was
controlled by Democrats at the time.
His bill called for defining what "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"
means. Lungren proposed that the clause would apply to any person born to a
parent who is a citizen, a legal alien or an alien serving in the military. |
|
