由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 1 in 3 Employers Will Drop Health Benefits After ObamaCare Kicks In, Survey Finds
相关主题
Left Is Certain of Tea Partiers' Motives, but Finds Terrorists InscrutableObamaCare's Costs Are Soaring
Lockton: Nearly 20% of employers may drop health coverageMcKinsey Quarterly:30%雇主在2014年奥巴马医疗法案生效后,肯定或很可能停止目前的雇主资助的医疗保险
be a business owner and change your local politics dynamics!!!!Employer health coverage in U.S. on 10-year decline
汪得猛引用的文章印证了我的一个老观点--必须打击投机经济Obama’s New Delay of Employer Mandate Violates Plain Language of Law
USCIS 从4月3号开始暂停h1b 加急申请疤蟆care造成医疗保费飞速增长
Presidents: "Homework" vs. "Rhetoric"74% Of Obamacare Sign-Ups Were Previously Insured
旧金山四口之家年收入$117400属于“低收入”家庭现在的民主党越来越像列宁政党,不得不佩服他们的团结
The Geography of a Depression (转载)简单的道理:最低工资越高,机器人代替工人的可能性越大
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: employers话题: health话题: employees话题: survey话题: benefits
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
Thirty percent of employers will definitely or probably stop offering health
benefits to their employees once the main provisions of President Obama's
federal health care law go into effect in 2014, a new survey finds.
The research published in the McKinsey Quarterly found that the number rises
to 50 percent among employers who are highly aware of the health care law.
McKinsey and Company, which identifies itself as a management consultant
that aims to help businesses run more productively and competitively,
conducted the survey of more than 1,300 employers earlier this year. It said
the survey spanned industries, geographies and employer sizes.
But the White House pushed back against the report.
"This report is at odds with the experts from the Congressional Budget
Office, the Rand Corporation, the Urban Institute and history," a senior
administration official told Fox News. "History has shown that reform
motivates more businesses to offer insurance."
"Health reform in Massachusetts uses a similar structure, with an exchange,
a personal responsibility requirement and an employer responsibility
requirement," the official said. "And the number of individuals with
employer-sponsored insurance in Massachusetts has increased."
According to the survey, at least 30 percent of employers would reap
financial gain from dropping coverage even if they compensated employees for
the change through other benefit offerings or higher salaries.
The research notes among the new provisions that could spur employers to
drop coverage is a requirement of all employers with more than 50 employees
to offer health benefits to every full-timer or pay a penalty of $2,000 per
worker. Those benefits must also be equal between highly compensated
executives and hourly employees – requirements that will increase medical
costs for many companies.
The findings are distinct from a Congressional Budget Office estimate that
only about 7 percent of employees who currently get health coverage through
their jobs would have to switch to subsidized-exchange polices in 2014.
The group said its variance is so wide because shifting away from employer-
sponsored insurance "will be economically rational" given the "law's
incentives." The law requires employers to make insurance available to low-
income or part-time employees that may not otherwise be covered.
The research found that contrary to what many employers feared, most
employees -- more than 85 percent -- would stay at jobs that no longer
offered health benefits. But 60 percent of employees would expect higher
compensation.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
简单的道理:最低工资越高,机器人代替工人的可能性越大USCIS 从4月3号开始暂停h1b 加急申请
切尔西出面恳求床总不再调查她老妈(视频)Presidents: "Homework" vs. "Rhetoric"
瘪盖子:机器人们应该交税旧金山四口之家年收入$117400属于“低收入”家庭
教育、醫療出色 麻州登全美最佳州The Geography of a Depression (转载)
Left Is Certain of Tea Partiers' Motives, but Finds Terrorists InscrutableObamaCare's Costs Are Soaring
Lockton: Nearly 20% of employers may drop health coverageMcKinsey Quarterly:30%雇主在2014年奥巴马医疗法案生效后,肯定或很可能停止目前的雇主资助的医疗保险
be a business owner and change your local politics dynamics!!!!Employer health coverage in U.S. on 10-year decline
汪得猛引用的文章印证了我的一个老观点--必须打击投机经济Obama’s New Delay of Employer Mandate Violates Plain Language of Law
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: employers话题: health话题: employees话题: survey话题: benefits