由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Navy buys biofuel for $16 a gallon
相关主题
从国防预算授权看GOP政客美国穷人是这样消耗税银的 (转载)
马凯令人失望This is amusing, young fuckers
政府补贴的“生物燃料”(biofuels)也不够“绿色”?"Vacationing is a human right", EU says so
16$/gallon的天价油.Goldman Sachs wants regulation, not laissez-faire
U.S. Navy's new $13B aircraft carrier can't fight (转载)The lefty's facts
美国国营Amtrak铁路,平均每个乘客要纳税人补贴$32美元"Real Truth about Illegal Immigrantion"
Pelosi on Natural Gas: Fossil Fuel or Not?Michelle Malkin轰奥巴马的芝加哥式政治手腕
UA事件个人看法defund NPR: GOP's old rallying cry
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: navy话题: biofuel话题: obama话题: fuels话题: fuel
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
The Obama Navy Illustrates Why America Is Sinking: PC Navy Buying Biofuel At
$16 A Gallon
In Obama’s God damn America we do truly breathtakingly stupid things and
then keep doing them until we collapse. And then of course we can also add
a healthy mixture of Obama’s crony capitalist fascism:
Navy buys biofuel for $16 a gallon
posted at 7:00 pm on December 11, 2011 by J.E. Dyer
This is going to help the Defense Department weather looming budget cuts
, for sure. Teaming up with the Department of Agriculture (which has a
cheery Rotary Club ring to it), the Navy has purchased 450,000 gallons of
biofuel for about $16 a gallon, or about 4 times the price of its standard
marine fuel, JP-5, which has been going for under $4 a gallon.
You won’t be surprised to learn that a member of Obama’s presidential
transition team, T. J. Glauthier, is a “strategic advisor” at Solazyme,
the California company that is selling a portion of the biofuel to the Navy.
Glauthier worked – shock, shock – on the energy-sector portion of the
2009 stimulus bill.
The Navy sale isn’t Solazyme’s first trip to the public trough, of
course. The company got a $21.8 million grant from the 2009 stimulus package.
Solazyme’s partner in the biofuel sale is Dynamic Fuels, a Louisiana
company owned jointly by Tyson Foods and Tulsa-based Syntroleum. Tyson and
Syntroleum are distinguished by having profitable lines of business that do
not rely on government grants to unprofitable “green” projects. This does
not make their biofuel product price-competitive with fossil fuels, however.
(They were induced to develop biofuel manufacturing processes by a
combination of subsidies and tax breaks.)
The Dynamic Fuels plant was opened for business in Geismar, LA in 2010,
becoming by far the largest biofuels plant in North America – and
reportedly, in combination with a plant in Finland, a producer of 94% of the
world’s biofuels. This is great boosterism stuff, but the biofuels
produced by Dynamic Fuels are still considerably more expensive than the
fossil-fuel alternative. Dynamic Fuels has begun supplying aviation biofuel
to KLM, the Dutch flag carrier, but of course, the use of more-expensive
biofuels by commercial carriers has to be subsidized by governments.
If governments stopped subsidizing biofuels, their artificial “
profitability” would disappear overnight. Price-wise, they can’t compete
with fossil fuels. The day may come when they can, but subsidizing them
while they don’t is not a method with any record of success for encouraging
price efficiency. What it does instead is create languishing public
dependencies and tremendous opportunities for cronyism, as demonstrated in
the Solyndra scandal.
As the Institute for Energy Research article (top link) indicates, the
US has enormous reserves of both conventional and unconventional oil and
natural gas resources. Opening them up for exploitation would, among other
things, ensure that the US armed forces could buy cheaper fuel – cheaper
than today’s prices – produced in the USA. At a time when federal debt is
spiraling and the Defense Department is facing budget cuts that are
guaranteed to gut the fighting forces and render them ineffective, it seems
to border on insane to eschew a ready, significantly cheaper alternative and
require the armed services to quadruple what they pay for fuel as a proof
of concept – apparently with the idea that the forces should buy more of
the 4-times-as-expensive fuel. This is, after all, our national security we
’re talking about.
While Obama is making the Navy shoot itself in both feet by buying fuel that
costs FOUR TIMES what they need to spend, he is simultaneously demanding
that the military’s budget be gutted by $600 billion – AFTER he already
gutted it $450 billion the year before.
And to “pay for” forcing the Navy to purchase fuel that costs four times
more than what they had been buying, Obama is going to lay off more than 3,
000 valuable mid-level sailors who make up the heart of our armed forces.
Hopefully all that biofuel is for ships with names like “The USS Dodo Bird.
” Because that’s the way we’re going under this president’s leadership.
Or maybe the “USS Teapot Dome” in honor of Obama’s in-your-face blatant
corruption.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
defund NPR: GOP's old rallying cryU.S. Navy's new $13B aircraft carrier can't fight (转载)
Dr. Hanson:对非法移民的争论经常关注于开支和利益上,但最终来说那是个复杂的道德问题美国国营Amtrak铁路,平均每个乘客要纳税人补贴$32美元
美国两党参议员呼吁停止补贴种玉米造乙醇Pelosi on Natural Gas: Fossil Fuel or Not?
佩林轰奥巴马借人造全球暖化歇斯底里大搞裙带资本主义UA事件个人看法
从国防预算授权看GOP政客美国穷人是这样消耗税银的 (转载)
马凯令人失望This is amusing, young fuckers
政府补贴的“生物燃料”(biofuels)也不够“绿色”?"Vacationing is a human right", EU says so
16$/gallon的天价油.Goldman Sachs wants regulation, not laissez-faire
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: navy话题: biofuel话题: obama话题: fuels话题: fuel