1I can’t wait to see what those courageous atheists come up with for Ramadan.
Christmas in America is a season of time-honored traditions — the sacred
performance of the annual ACLU lawsuit over the presence of an
insufficiently secular “holiday” tree; the ritual provocations of the
atheist displays licensed by pitifully appeasing municipalities to sit
between the menorah and the giant Frosty the Snowman; the familiar strains
of every hack columnist’s “war on Christmas” column rolling off the
keyboard as easily as Richard Clayderman playing “Winter Wonderland” . . .
This year has been a choice year. A crucified skeleton Santa Claus was
erected as part of the “holiday” display outside the Loudoun County
courthouse in Virginia — because, let’s face it, nothing cheers the hearts
of moppets in the Old Dominion like telling them, “Yes, Virginia, there is
a Santa Claus — and he’s hanging lifeless in the town square.” Alas, a
week ago, some local burghers failed to get into the ecumenical spirit and
decapitated him. Who are these killjoys? Christians intolerant of the First
Amendment (as some have suggested)? Or perhaps a passing Saudi? Our friends
in Riyadh only the other day beheaded Amina bin Salem (so to speak) Nasser
for “sorcery,” and it would surely be grossly discriminatory not to have
some Wahhabist holiday traditions on display in Loudoun County. (The Islamic
Saudi Academy, after all, is one of the most prestigious educational
institutions of neighboring Fairfax County.) Across the fruitcaked plain in
California, the city of Santa Monica allocated permits for “holiday”
displays at Palisades Park by means of lottery. Eighteen of the 21 slots
went to atheists — for example, the slogan “37 million Americans know a
myth when they see one” over portraits of Jesus, Santa, and Satan.
I don’t believe I’ve mentioned the city of Santa Monica in this space
since my Christmas offering of 1998, when President Clinton was in the midst
of difficulties arising from his mentoring of a certain intern. My column
that year began:
“Operator, I’d like to call Santa Monica.”
“Why? Just ’cause he’s a little overweight?”
Crickets chirping? Ah, how soon they forget. Perhaps Santa Monica should
adopt a less theocratic moniker and change its name to Satan Monica, as its
interpretation of the separation of church and state seems to have evolved
into expressions of public contempt for large numbers of the citizenry
augmented by the traumatizing of their children. Boy, I can’t wait to see
what those courageous atheists come up with for Ramadan. Or does that set
their hearts aflutter quite as much?
One sympathizes, up to a point. As America degenerates from a land of laws
to a land of legalisms, much of life is devoted to forestalling litigation.
What’s less understandable is the faintheartedness of explicitly Christian
institutions. Last year I chanced to see the e-mail exchanges between
college administrators over the choice of that season’s Christmas card. I
will spare their blushes, and identify the academy only as a Catholic
college in New England. The thread began by asking the distribution list for
“thoughts” on the proposed design. No baby, no manger, no star over
Bethlehem, but a line drawing of a dove with a sprig of olive in its beak.
Underneath the image was the following:
What is Christmas?
It is tenderness for the past, courage for the present, hope for the
It is a fervent wish that every cup may overflow with blessings rich and
and that every path may lead to peace.
Agnes M. Pharo
The Agnes M. Pharo? A writer of such eminence that even the otherwise open-
to-all-comers Wikipedia has no entry for her. Still, as a purveyor of
vacuous pap to America’s credentialed class for all-purpose cultural cringe
, she’s hard to beat. One unfortunate soul on the distribution list
wandered deplorably off message and enquired whether the text “is
problematic because the answer to the question ‘What is Christmas?’ from a
Catholic perspective is that it is the celebration of the birth of Christ.
” Her colleague patiently responded that, not to worry, all this religious-
type meaning was covered by the word “blessings.” No need to use any
insufficiently inclusive language about births of Saviors and whatnot; we
all get the cut of Agnes’s jib from the artfully amorphous “blessings.”
When an explicitly Catholic institution thinks that the meaning of Christmas
is “tenderness for the past, vapid generalities for the present, evasive
abstractions for the future,” it’s pretty much over. Suffering no such
urge to self-abasement, Muslim students at the Catholic University of
America in Washington, D.C., recently filed a complaint over the lack of
Islamic prayer rooms on the campus. They find it offensive to have to pray
surrounded by Christian symbols such as crucifixes and paintings of
distinguished theologians. True, this thought might have occurred to them
before they applied to an institution called “Catholic University.” On the
other hand, it’s surely not unreasonable for them to have expected
Catholic University to muster no more than the nominal rump Christianity of
that Catholic college in New England. Why wouldn’t you demand Muslim prayer
rooms? As much as belligerent atheists, belligerent Muslims reckon that a
decade or so hence “Catholic colleges” will be Catholic mainly in the
sense that Istanbul’s Hagia Sophia is still a cathedral: That’s to say, it
’s a museum, a heritage site for where once was a believing church. And who
could object to the embalming of our inheritance? Christmas is all about “
tenderness for the past,” right? When Christian college administrators are
sending out cards saying “We believe in nothing,” why wouldn’t you take
them at their word?
Which brings us back in this season of joy to the Republican presidential
debates, the European debt crisis, and all the other fun stuff. The crisis
afflicting the West is not primarily one of unsustainable debt and spending.
These are mere symptoms of a deeper identity crisis. It is not necessary to
be a believing Christian to be unnerved by the ease and speed with which we
have cast off our inheritance and trampled it into the dust. When American
municipalities are proudly displaying the execution of skeleton Santas and
giant Satans on public property, it may just be a heartening exercise of the
First Amendment, it may be a trivial example of the narcissism of moral
frivolity. Or it could be a sign that eventually societies become too stupid
to survive. The fellows building the post-Western world figure they know
which it is.
— Mark Steyn, a National Review columnist, is the author of After America:
Get Ready for Armageddon. © 2011 Mark Steyn