由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Hollywood Disconnect, Valuing ‘Equality’ More Than ‘Liberty’
相关主题
川普发表讲话重申依然欢迎移民 zz原来Matt Damon 和Russell Crowe 都是大亨的马仔
Hollywood’s Vision of Conservatives穆斯林要求公共墓地把一个死者的墓地迁走
I did not expect these from Time Warner Cable希拉里的电邮置人生命于危险之中
Elysium是赤裸裸的民主党宣传片 (转载)超级碗中场,Beyonce表演的政治诉求
唉。看看这条评论霍金On Lying Trump
Elysium, 一部鼓吹非法移民的烂片子霍金称川普“是一个看来是在迎合最低品味的煽动者”,对他能获
Seen the movie "Elysium"?香港机场:穆斯林为大,其他宗教信徒靠边
我来做个大胆的预测,关于若干年后犹太人控制全球了解alt-right的思想现在其实是很有必要的
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: equality话题: liberty话题: station话题: hollywood话题: space
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
July 9, 2012 by Warner Todd Huston
We are soon to be regaled by yet another movie from Hollyweird that likely
misunderstands the difference between liberty (or freedom) and equality.
This we might infer from the recently released advance plot synopsis for the
upcoming movie Elysium from Director Neil Blomkamp, director of the
surprise 2009 Sci Fi hit District 9.
Blomkamp’s new film is set in the not-too-distant future where the human
elite live in a cushy space station circling the Earth while the rest of
humanity toils down on the environmentally distressed Earth. In this film,
the hero (played by Matt Damon, who else?) will battle to, according to the
synopsis, “bring equality to these polarized worlds.”
In the year 2159 two classes of people exist: the very wealthy who live
on a pristine man-made space station called Elysium, and the rest, who live
on an overpopulated, ruined Earth. Secretary Rhodes (Jodie Foster), a hard
line government official, will stop at nothing to enforce anti-immigration
laws and preserve the luxurious lifestyle of the citizens of Elysium. That
doesn’t stop the people of Earth from trying to get in, by any means they
can. When unlucky Max (Matt Damon) is backed into a corner, he agrees to
take on a daunting mission that if successful will not only save his life,
but could bring equality to these polarized worlds.
Sounds like a typical Sci Fi dystopian plot, right? Well, yes, if by typical
you mean morally muddled and confused. In fact, it is the same sort of
confusion we get from Hollywood Sci Fi all the time.
Hollywood’s confusion comes in over the question of which system should be
most valued as the best one for the humanity. With these films it becomes
woefully obvious that Hollyweirders are obsessed with “equality” more than
they are freedom!
We have a film plot of contrasts here. It’s a common tale of the “rich” (
always defined as evil, uncaring, and selfish) against the “poor” (always
the noble, but downtrodden reg’lar folks like you and me). But notice the
reason the hero is the good guy here. He’s going to “bring equality” to
the two worlds, you see? So, let’s think about this idea, shall we?
The “two worlds” are separated for a reason. The “rich” are living in
luxury on the space station but their “world” is tightly controlled as to
who can come and go. Why is this? Because, of course, their resources —
while amazingly wealthy — are finite. They have to carefully guard what
they have or they will lose it if their riches are given equally to all of
humanity.
So, what would “equality” mean to those on the space station should our
intrepid hero “bring” it to them? It would mean that their quality of life
will be heavily degraded for certain.
Some are prone to say, “Good. Them darned ol’ Rich creeps deserve to be
laid low.”
But what of the teeming millions on Earth? What will bringing the space
station elites down mean to them? Sure they will feel a momentary high of
satisfaction that the evil rich dudes on the space station have been brought
down, but the lives of the poor will only marginally improve if they
improve at all once the resources of the space station are distributed. In
the end, equality does not mean that all can be upgraded to space station
status, but that all would living a life of the lowest, most affordable
common denominator. Everyone will share in the misery as opposed to sharing
much of the luxury.
It’s a socialist fantasy of “equality” we see here, not a tale of freedom.
Is equality better than liberty, though? What is the best model for human
life? Does a better concept exist? Is there a better moral idea?
Certainly we already have that best model of human existence identified. It
’s called liberty.
The better idea would be not to bring down the evil rich to the lowest
common denominator of human existence but to find a way to give every human
an equal shot at living that space station life — if only metaphorically.
This is a world based on liberty.
In a world of liberty everyone has the chance to make it according to his
best abilities. Does it mean some people will achieve more than others? Sure
. It is simply impossible to imagine every one person can be as excellent as
the next. Some will do better than others simply because we are not all
equal mentally and/or physically. It’s a simple matter of fact. But with
liberty we all have a chance to achieve what we can. Thomas Jefferson called
it, a “natural aristocracy of men.”
Unfortunately, liberty is squashed by a top down imposition of “equality”
which, by its very nature, prevents each of us from achieving to the heights
of our individual abilities. We each can achieve our personal best only if
we have the liberty to strive for it. And this means “equality” is not
only not possible, but not wanted.
Director Blomkamps first major film, District 9, was pretty good. So, here’
s hoping he won’t fall into the typical Hollywood trap of imagining that “
equality” is better than liberty.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
了解alt-right的思想现在其实是很有必要的唉。看看这条评论
Trump: I don't like herosElysium, 一部鼓吹非法移民的烂片子
宪法并不关心枪造成的伤害,而这是件好事!Seen the movie "Elysium"?
美国现在已经公开讨论如何在内战中生存 (转载)我来做个大胆的预测,关于若干年后犹太人控制全球
川普发表讲话重申依然欢迎移民 zz原来Matt Damon 和Russell Crowe 都是大亨的马仔
Hollywood’s Vision of Conservatives穆斯林要求公共墓地把一个死者的墓地迁走
I did not expect these from Time Warner Cable希拉里的电邮置人生命于危险之中
Elysium是赤裸裸的民主党宣传片 (转载)超级碗中场,Beyonce表演的政治诉求
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: equality话题: liberty话题: station话题: hollywood话题: space