c******i
发帖数: 4091 | 1 当然这两者竞选的时候喊口号会假装有区别。
但在关键性的问题上，audit FED，这两者做为华尔街的傀儡，都是坚决反对查FED的假
账。
这说明，不从audit FED开始解决华尔街的问题而奢谈其它细枝末节，都不过是随着华
尔街的指挥棒起舞。 | l******a
发帖数: 3803 | 2
agreed.
both are far from our long-awaited expectations to bring the state back on
track. Don't forget the housing bubble stemmed from the days the congress
with support from both parties passed the sorta aid for poor housing act
years before Bush took office.
If a Republican president now ruling the country, he will most likely get a
lot of critique as well. But, the difference is, in the scale of failure,
obama easily hits 9-9.9, while a republican would hit around 3-7. Now our
choice.
The effort of liberals over the past decades have been extremely
successfully engaged in diversifying the demographics of the US. There is no
ways they've not thought of being creative in that matter. As such, there
is little left for a this huge country to get to a single solution that is
pure from the beginning and would be thus carried out through the end
relentlessly.
People suffer when they make compromises. But at times a sacrifice is worth
the pain. In good ole days, a candidate as soft as Romney would have never
been on the ticket for representing the conservative. Even if he gets on
primary, he would be shot down by a stricter guy of no Mormon connection.
Admit it, guys, that day has long gone, thanks to the wild mobs from the
other political end. If there is a guy gets elected to the presidency by
sticking to extremism of their ideology, it would be a democratic with
overwhelming media machine and one-sided propaganda.
In this battle to a better future for everybody ( I mean everyone from both
sides ), the only way that works is by winning the independent. The point
that we cannot stress enough is - let's make it clear once and for all -
voters from both sides will benefit by having a Republican president who
pulls this already divided nation out of the class war mess and focuses on
growth of economy and invest in the future of the continent whose greatness
has been greatly reduced by a stupid astray puppet wrongly placed in a
position he shouldn've been in the first place.
Let's initiate a campaign to end political correctness and respect the
CONSTITUTION. The country needs to find back its root on which the
prosperity depends.
【在 c******i 的大作中提到】
: 当然这两者竞选的时候喊口号会假装有区别。
: 但在关键性的问题上，audit FED，这两者做为华尔街的傀儡，都是坚决反对查FED的假
: 账。
: 这说明，不从audit FED开始解决华尔街的问题而奢谈其它细枝末节，都不过是随着华
: 尔街的指挥棒起舞。
| c******i
发帖数: 4091 | 3 a republican president这种泛指，不能证明什么。ron paul和弱木尼侯赛因的区别太
大了。
我的观点就是，如果不能audit FED，那么弱木尼和侯赛因在failure scale上相同的概
率远远大于不同的概率。你的假设弱木尼的3-7没有任何事实可以给出信心区间。弱木
尼的哪些政策能够切实让被残酷剥削的中产从FED的惩罚性货币政策磨盘里解放出来？
我目前没有看到。
因为目前所有fail的项目，bubble/debt/unemployment/healthcare/tax互相纠缠，寻
根究底，要从audit FED开始才能理清症结祛除沉疴。
如果有牺牲和折衷可以换来好处，那么请具体摆明有哪些好处是可以被监督实现而不是
lip service？弱木尼在这方面没有比侯赛因有任何不同。
现实已如此清晰，而ron paul已经指出了正确的道路来医治沉疴让大家重获自由，那么
有什么理由让大家再度自欺欺人地陷入两党的陷阱呢？
什么是两党陷阱呢？大家都知道朝三暮四的寓言吧？耍猴儿的先推出侯赛因就是朝三，
等选民有意见了，再推出弱木尼就是暮四。猴儿们觉得前后顺序换了一下就以为自己赚
到了一些，其实总量还是一样的。
坚持选择ron paul，输的会是FED华尔街及其两党傀儡而非你我，否则你我就真成了螺
丝钉注定终生被FED华尔街及其两党傀儡每四年反复screw。
a
【在 l******a 的大作中提到】
:
: agreed.
: both are far from our long-awaited expectations to bring the state back on
: track. Don't forget the housing bubble stemmed from the days the congress
: with support from both parties passed the sorta aid for poor housing act
: years before Bush took office.
: If a Republican president now ruling the country, he will most likely get a
: lot of critique as well. But, the difference is, in the scale of failure,
: obama easily hits 9-9.9, while a republican would hit around 3-7. Now our
: choice.
|
|
