l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 by wheatington
If a Republican were president, perhaps even if an American were president,
the media would have been all over the Libyan situation like ugly on a toad.
But since the Oval Office has been usurped by a person of colour and thus
is immune from personal responsibility for incompetence or malice, no one
is much interested in looking for the truth.
Obama has lied to Americans and has attempted to cover up his lie. Tricky
Dick Nixon tried that and it cost him a rich presidential legacy. The press
searched, pried, bribed, and eventually uncovered the petty crime of break
and enter.
Obama has lied about his role, a huge one, in the murder of Ambassador
Chris Stevens and three other US citizens. The Buck Stops Here so a sign on
Harry S (for nothing) Truman’s desk claimed. Harry didn’t duck tough
questions nor tough decisions. Obama is more of a shift the buck to someone
else kind of joker.
(Even the killing of Osama, Obama’s one accomplishment, was phoney. Hillary
and military commanders make that decision. The ego maniac merely took
credit.)
Back to Banghazi-Gate, here’s a summation of attacks in Benghazi. Obama
did not increase security despite pleadings by Ambassador Stevens and Eric
Nordstrom, the former Regional Security Officer at the Embassy in Libya, who
told congressional investigators that in Benghazi was inappropriately low.
He also said he believed that State Department officials stood in the way of
his attempts to change that.
House Oversight Committee Chair Darrell Issa said the Innocence of Muslims
video was never cited as the reason for the attacks in Benghazi. This is in
direct contradiction to Obama who has told Americans, Pakistanis, and the
UN General Assembly that the video was the reason for the attacks. A man
under oath before a congressional investigation committee is more likely to
tell the truth than a pathological liar who intent on getting re-elected so
he can continue to undermine all things American. |
|
