由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Democrats Want Background Checks… Except When They Don’t
相关主题
Article On John Edwards Never Once Mentions ‘Democrat'我为什麽支持Obama: Supreme court balance
民主是少数服从多数世界上有哪个国家医疗是免费的?
12月份枪支销售创纪录Suddenly The Actor IS a Reason Condemn a Movie?
background check在参议院没有通过 (转载)No, Left-Wingers, the ‘Founders’ Did NOT Approve of Mandates or Obamacare
Feds file civil rights suits on companies using criminal background checks for hires Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/22/obama-administration-files-suits-against-businesses using criminal backgroundElizabeth Warren Lies or is She a Victim of ‘Right-Wing Smear Machine’?
“幸福指数”比GDP增长率重要吗?共和党州长大会,州长们恳请romney公布5年报税
经济全球化背后的魔鬼Government employee's salary under GOP and DEM
Pew Research: Republican 44% Democrat 48% (转载)看样子 GOP 永远不能胜呀
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: checks话题: background话题: democrats话题: obama话题: want
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
February 18, 2013
by Warner Todd Huston
One of the main discussions in this ginned up, fact-free anti-gun debate
coming from the Democrats and their fellow extreme leftists is that they
want “universal background checks” for gun purchases. So, “background
checks” are a good idea to left-wingers… but in all cases? As it happens,
NO is the answer to that. Democrats don’t want universal background checks
in all cases.
Jams Bovard shows us this fact quite clearly in his recent Wall Street
Journal piece headlined, “Perform Criminal Background Checks at Your Peril.”
Now, Bovard isn’t talking about the gun debate with his piece. In fact, he
never mentions guns even one time. Bovard, you see, is talking about
background checks as a condition for employment.
As it happens, Democrats and the Obama administration are attempting to
eliminate background checks for prospective employees claiming it is a “
civil rights” issue.
The specific case concerns a man of Mexican origin who was denied employment
as a truck driver because he had a criminal record. The record was
discovered via a routine background check. Obama and his department of
injustice claimed that the trucking company had no right to deny employment
to the criminal saying it violated his “civil rights.”
Worse, the Obama administration essentially announced through the release of
a set of new “guidelines” that the federal government will try to
prosecute employers even if they are following state laws.
As far as Obama is concerned, no matter what the people want through laws
written by their duly elected state officials, no background checks will be
allowed.
So, what does this have to do with background checks for gun purchases?
Simply this: it is hypocritical for Obama and his extremist, left-wing
comrades to claim that background checks on potential employees assumes a
criminal past of these potential employees and should not, therefore, be
allowed yet support background checks for potential gun buyers based on the
same, exact principle.
If background checks violate a person’s civil liberties in order to gain
employment, then background checks also violate a person’s civil liberties
in order to enjoy their Constitutional rights.
After all, the right to a job is not in the Constitution, but the right to a
firearm is.
l******t
发帖数: 12659
2
呵呵,左翼说胡话了?
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
看样子 GOP 永远不能胜呀Feds file civil rights suits on companies using criminal background checks for hires Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/22/obama-administration-files-suits-against-businesses using criminal background
for right wingers here, would you...“幸福指数”比GDP增长率重要吗?
左派要抵制facebook吗?经济全球化背后的魔鬼
Trump is a left winger who self-identifies as conservativePew Research: Republican 44% Democrat 48% (转载)
Article On John Edwards Never Once Mentions ‘Democrat'我为什麽支持Obama: Supreme court balance
民主是少数服从多数世界上有哪个国家医疗是免费的?
12月份枪支销售创纪录Suddenly The Actor IS a Reason Condemn a Movie?
background check在参议院没有通过 (转载)No, Left-Wingers, the ‘Founders’ Did NOT Approve of Mandates or Obamacare
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: checks话题: background话题: democrats话题: obama话题: want