由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Federal Judge Strikes Down Restrictions On Morning-After Pill
相关主题
Pelosi Vows to Stand With Obama Against Catholic ChurchSupreme Court halts contraception mandate for religious groups
"Never before has an administration taken such a bold step"Federal Judge Grants Injunction Against Obamacare's Contraception-Abortifacient Mandate
the facts about george town contraception coverage高院裁定可以因为宗教原因不提供避孕的保险
How the Free Market Can Cure Health Care49%的调查者支持高院关于Hobby Lobby的决定
Georgetown Rejects Fluke-Led Effort on ContraceptionSenate Liberals Narrowly Lose Bid to Reverse SCOTUS Religious Freedom Victory
For the second time in her adult lifetime...NY一名法官block Bloomberg的large soda cup ban
"I see this $4.6 billion buying us misery"NYC禁止大杯苏打饮料决定被法官叫停了 (转载)
Judge mocks Obama’s ‘accommodation’ proposal on contraception mandateJudge: IRS Obamacare Rule 'Is Arbitrary, Capricious, and Abuse of Discretion'
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: plan话题: health话题: sebelius话题: fda
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
m********a
发帖数: 1041
1
A federal judge in Brooklyn, N.Y., has ruled that the morning-after pill for
emergency contraception must be made available over the counter to girls 16
and under.
The ruling could end a more than decade-long battle over how easy or
difficult it should be for teenage girls to obtain emergency contraception.
The ruling would also make it easier for older women to obtain the drug
because it wouldn't have to be kept behind drugstore counters anymore.
The judge's order effectively overturns a controversial 2011 decision by
Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius overruling the Food
and Drug Administration. After years of study and internal debate, the FDA
had decided that Plan B One Step should be allowed for sale without a
prescription — and without age restrictions.
In the ruling dated April 4, Senior Judge Edward R. Korman of the Eastern
District of New York held that Sebelius's decision on Plan B was "arbitrary,
capricious, and unreasonable."
On page 47 of the 59-page decision, Korman skewers Sebelius's decision,
calling it "politically motivated, scientifically unjustified, and contrary
to agency precedent ...."
He also slammed the FDA's rejection of a so-called Citizen's Petition dating
to 2005 that argued for the agency to approve unfettered over-the-counter
sale of Plan B. That rejection, he said, was a direct consequence of
Sebelius's ruling.
In the decision, Korman sends the Plan B case back to FDA with orders to
make the morning-after pill "available without a prescription and without
point-of-sale or age restrictions within 30 days." If the agency decides the
instructions for the drugs need tweaks, that's OK.
When Sebelius essentially vetoed the FDA's decision in late 2011, women's
health groups erupted in protest. "As doctors and researchers have
repeatedly stated, ample research shows Plan B to be safe for women of all
ages and appropriate for over-the-counter access. It is deeply disappointing
that this administration would repeat the mistakes of the previous one,"
said Susan Wood, an associate professor at George Washington University's
School of Public Health. Wood was an assistant commissioner for women's
health at the FDA but quit in 2005 over its continued delay on over-the-
counter approval for Plan B.
Advocates for Plan B kept up the pressure on the administration to reverse
itself. They argued, in part, that the rules were just too complicated. "The
unique dual-labeling of Plan B One Step has led to confusion among
consumers and health care professionals alike, particularly regarding age
restrictions and whether men and women can purchase non-prescription
emergency contraception," said a letter signed by more than three dozen
women's health, reproductive rights and individual providers of health care.
"A recent Boston University study of 943 pharmacies in five major cities
revealed that, when called posed as 17 year olds seeking EC, one in five
were told they could not purchase EC under any circumstances," the letter
said at the time. In fact, those 17 and older are eligible to purchase the
product without a prescription; those 16 and younger may purchase it with a
health provider's written order.
m********a
发帖数: 1041
2
不知道這是這算是好事還是壞事。取得方便的緊急避孕藥, 也許真的能減少些因意外懷
孕而影響生涯規畫的憾事吧!可是我就還是很難接受這種自由和方便啦!
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
Judge: IRS Obamacare Rule 'Is Arbitrary, Capricious, and Abuse of Discretion'Georgetown Rejects Fluke-Led Effort on Contraception
Obama the 'Magic Negro'For the second time in her adult lifetime...
怪不得民主党要加税,因为他们自己不缴税"I see this $4.6 billion buying us misery"
还有人说猪流感和普通季节流感没什么区别?Judge mocks Obama’s ‘accommodation’ proposal on contraception mandate
Pelosi Vows to Stand With Obama Against Catholic ChurchSupreme Court halts contraception mandate for religious groups
"Never before has an administration taken such a bold step"Federal Judge Grants Injunction Against Obamacare's Contraception-Abortifacient Mandate
the facts about george town contraception coverage高院裁定可以因为宗教原因不提供避孕的保险
How the Free Market Can Cure Health Care49%的调查者支持高院关于Hobby Lobby的决定
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: plan话题: health话题: sebelius话题: fda