j*****v
发帖数: 7717 | 1 對蘋果最有利的態度應該是幫忙破解，最後說對不起，我們破不了。這樣大家才能真正
信任
蘋果的產品。
那庫克為什麼要裝逼呢？因為蘋果本身有後門，政府知道，蘋果知道。政府也未必需要
蘋果的幫助，NSA的高手那麼多，這次最多就是尋求蘋果的幫助能更快更省的破解。
如果蘋果幫政府破解，有後門這個不公開的秘密被公之於眾，誰能相信蘋果的後門不用
來做別的用
途？
為了蘋果的信譽，庫克的裝逼是迫不得已，沒辦法的辦法。 |
S**H
发帖数: 1256 | 2 google家的发言就挺好的。说有 valid law order 会帮忙access data.
但是不给留后门。 |
n***t
发帖数: 8357 | 3 support cook, fuck government. |
x****d
发帖数: 2239 | 4 I don't understand the hostility towards Cook/Apple, I think they are doing
a big favor to average Joe, and have balls to stand up.
Repeat after me:
Government should never have been given a blank check, should always being
questioned/challenged.
"People who give up privacy for safety deserve neither." |
j*****v
发帖数: 7717 | 5 破解一個謿⒘4個無辜的恐怖分子的手機，不能算是give a blank check.
蘋果這次是為維護自己的利益，找個裝B的理由
doing
【在 x****d 的大作中提到】
: I don't understand the hostility towards Cook/Apple, I think they are doing
: a big favor to average Joe, and have balls to stand up.
: Repeat after me:
: Government should never have been given a blank check, should always being
: questioned/challenged.
: "People who give up privacy for safety deserve neither."
|
x****d
发帖数: 2239 | 6 你有读court order 吗？
"The court is ordering the company to “bypass or disable” a feature that
automatically wipes an iPhone clean of all its data after 10 incorrect
password attempts have been entered. This is a standard feature on iPhones."
This is a slippery slope. Once you open this precedent, where do you draw
the line?
【在 j*****v 的大作中提到】
: 破解一個謿⒘4個無辜的恐怖分子的手機，不能算是give a blank check.
: 蘋果這次是為維護自己的利益，找個裝B的理由
:
: doing
|
j*****v
发帖数: 7717 | 7 where did it say for ALL iphones?
and why they have to even bring this to court?
did FBI ask them to disable/bypass this feature for ALL iphones in the first
place?
."
【在 x****d 的大作中提到】
: 你有读court order 吗？
: "The court is ordering the company to “bypass or disable” a feature that
: automatically wipes an iPhone clean of all its data after 10 incorrect
: password attempts have been entered. This is a standard feature on iPhones."
: This is a slippery slope. Once you open this precedent, where do you draw
: the line?
|
x****d
发帖数: 2239 | 8 Rest case.
No need discuss this.
Trump is more important.
first
【在 j*****v 的大作中提到】
: where did it say for ALL iphones?
: and why they have to even bring this to court?
: did FBI ask them to disable/bypass this feature for ALL iphones in the first
: place?
:
: ."
|
h*s
发帖数: 2134 | 9 你这种傻逼就不明白，库克和政府那叫互相炒作郎情妾意，
等一阵过去，该解锁解锁，该干啥干啥，人上来就说要解所，怕你这种傻逼屁民骂苹果
没节操
懂不？
【在 n***t 的大作中提到】
: support cook, fuck government.
|
S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 10 What make you think that iPhone is so unique that the security weakening
method, if developed, cannot be used on any, at minimum, iPhone 5c?
first
【在 j*****v 的大作中提到】
: where did it say for ALL iphones?
: and why they have to even bring this to court?
: did FBI ask them to disable/bypass this feature for ALL iphones in the first
: place?
:
: ."
|
n***t
发帖数: 8357 | 11
你这种阳痿手淫犯就更加不知道了。让你舔屁眼你非去舔鸡巴
【在 h*s 的大作中提到】
: 你这种傻逼就不明白，库克和政府那叫互相炒作郎情妾意，
: 等一阵过去，该解锁解锁，该干啥干啥，人上来就说要解所，怕你这种傻逼屁民骂苹果
: 没节操
: 懂不？
|
