由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Liberals’ Double Standard on Bathrooms, Boycotts, and Religious Freedom
相关主题
印第安纳州立法可以不为gay佬主持婚礼,也不用做蛋糕了北卡税制改革,州长刚刚签字通过新法案 (转载)
Dobbs bashes the liberal judge厉害,已经14个州拒绝接受叙利亚难民了 (转载)
给NPR/KUOW 的公开信:We Are Not Your Pets夏洛特的二流子任意使用厕所法案被北卡州否决,左逼如丧考妣
All liberal politicians need to know and remember thisOBAMA干预北卡LGBT law
Boycott Ivanka 的活动要开始了北卡州长Pat McCrory做川普VP
target药丸North Carolina voter ID law overturned on appeal
如何使liberal愤怒.希玛原来真的怕recount阿
Liberal Haterecount很难改变结果:McCrory concedes
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: religious话题: carolina话题: north话题: freedom话题: liberals
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
Published on CNS News http://www.cnsnews.com
Liberals’ Double Standard on Bathrooms, Boycotts, and Religious Freedom
If it wasn’t for double-standards, some liberals would have none at all.
That seems to be the lesson from the past few weeks, where liberals have
displayed three distinct forms of hypocrisy.
Liberal governors and mayors signed travel bans to North Carolina and
Mississippi, CEOs of major corporations pledged boycotts and relocations,
and Bruce Springsteen and Bryan Adams have cancelled scheduled concerts in
those states.
At issue are a Mississippi [1] law that narrowly and carefully protects the
rights of religious charities, small businesses and select public servants,
and a North Carolina [2] law that reasonably protects privacy and safety in
public restrooms, while leaving private institutions free to set their own
bathroom policies. These laws, apparently, are now unacceptable to some
voices on the Left.
But are they really? The hypocrisy in their opposition suggests otherwise.
1. Big Money and Big Business in Politics Is Bad, Unless They Support the
Left?
Liberals decry the influence of big business and big money in politics. They
denounce, as a direct threat to democracy, the ability of corporations to
engage in issue advocacy. They argue politicians must answer to the people,
not the highest corporate bidder.
Or at least that’s what they used to say. Liberals are now cheering Apple,
PayPal, Salesforce, and countless other giant corporations threatening
legislators and governors with boycotts if they pass popular laws that the
left disapproves of.
These corporate elites didn’t win an argument about good public policy.
Instead they threatened to boycott and transfer jobs out of states if the
politicians didn’t do as they insisted.
This economic coercion is a form of cronyism—cultural cronyism [3]. Big
businesses use their outsized market share to pressure government to do
their bidding at the expense of the will of the people and the common good.
And, hypocritically, the Left cheers it on.
2. Bruce Springsteen and Bryan Adams Get to Follow Their Conscience, but the
Baker and Florist Don’t?
Many of us think that what these corporate giants are doing is bad for
representative democracy and self-government. But they have a right to do it
. And yet, they want to deny the rights of bakers, florists, photographers,
adoption agencies and marriage counselors who only want the same liberty to
follow their conscience.
Big business is using its market freedom to deny small businesses and
charities their religious freedom. The hypocrisy is astounding.
Take the cases of Bruce Springsteen and Bryan Adams [4]. They said their
consciences require them to deny their artistic gifts and talents to
citizens of states that have enacted policy they disagreed with. And, of
course, they have that right.
Adams wrote [4]: “I cannot in good conscience perform in a state where
certain people are being denied their civil rights.”
He’s wrong about the laws—they don’t deny anyone civil rights. Instead,
they protect civil rights. They protect religious freedom, which, as the
liberal American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) once acknowledged, is a civil
liberty.
So Springsteen and Adams are exercising their freedom of conscience by
boycotting states that sought to protect the consciences of adoption
agencies, religious schools, bakers and florist. Do they not see the
hypocrisy?
3. North Carolina and Mississippi are Human Rights Violators, but Singapore
and Cuba are Great?
Finally, if these boycotts are really a matter of principle—and not just
grandstanding—then why do so many of these same companies do business in
foreign countries with terrible records on human rights in general, and for
LGBT people in particular?
The governor of North Carolina, Pat McCrory, pointed out this hypocrisy [5].
After New York Governor Andrew Cuomo issued a travel ban for state
employees to North Carolina, Gov. McCrory asked how it was consistent with
Gov. Cuomo’s trip to Cuba—with state business leaders—to promote trade
with that country.
Is Cuba better on human rights than North Carolina? Or is New York Andrew
Gov. Cuomo being a bit hypocritical?
Others have pointed out the hypocrisy of PayPal. The CEO of PayPal announced
the company wouldn’t expand in North Carolina because of “PayPal’s
deepest values and our strong belief that every person has the right to be
treated equally, and with dignity and respect.”
Really?
Then PayPal might want to explain why its international headquarters are in
Singapore, where people engaged in private consensual same-sex acts can face
two years in jail [6]. It might also want to explain why it announced in
2012 that it would open offices in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). While
North Carolina placed some commonsense limits on public bathrooms, the UAE
reportedly jails gay and transgender people [6].
What’s Next?
The Left knows it’s can’t win on the merits in the debate about religious
freedom and bathroom privacy [7]. These bills enjoy strong public support—
that’s why elected representatives are voting to pass them. And it’s why
corporate elites have to target governors to veto them [8].
Missouri is likely the next state to move a religious freedom bill [9], and
we can expect the same cast of characters to come out in opposition. But
this time, the left and big business are entering the debate with one big
disadvantage—they’ve been beaten. Gov. Phil Bryant of Mississippi and Gov.
Pat McCrory of North Carolina have stood up to the bullies [10] and
shattered their aura of invincibility.
Ryan T. Anderson, Ph.D., researches and writes about marriage and religious
liberty as the William E. Simon senior research fellow in American
Principles and Public Policy at The Heritage Foundation. He also focuses on
justice and moral principles in economic thought, health care and education,
and has expertise in bioethics and natural law theory. He's the author of
the just-released book, Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and
Religious Liberty [11]."
Editor's Note: This piece was originally published by The Daily Signal [12].
Source URL: http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/ryan-t-anderson/liberals-double-standard-bathrooms-boycotts-and-religious-freedom
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
recount很难改变结果:McCrory concedesBoycott Ivanka 的活动要开始了
不怕狼一样的敌人,就怕猪一样的队友target药丸
Scientists Find 'Liberal Gene' (转载)如何使liberal愤怒.
liberal 挺逗的Liberal Hate
印第安纳州立法可以不为gay佬主持婚礼,也不用做蛋糕了北卡税制改革,州长刚刚签字通过新法案 (转载)
Dobbs bashes the liberal judge厉害,已经14个州拒绝接受叙利亚难民了 (转载)
给NPR/KUOW 的公开信:We Are Not Your Pets夏洛特的二流子任意使用厕所法案被北卡州否决,左逼如丧考妣
All liberal politicians need to know and remember thisOBAMA干预北卡LGBT law
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: religious话题: carolina话题: north话题: freedom话题: liberals