由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 著名华裔数学家陶哲轩证明了:Trump unfit to be president!
相关主题
John Oliver cited by Fields Medalist Terence Tao (转载)从媒体反应来看陶这是投名状
陶哲轩这次算是丢人了揭秘川普对犯罪分子”以牙还牙“强硬政策的根源
陶哲轩是一个非常典型的学数学学傻了的人川普2008年说希拉里会是个好总统 (转载)
Trump is living rent-free in Obama's headMy dinner with Donald: No bombast, bullying or bluster
陶哲轩是美国的皇帝还是精神领袖?右派眼中的聪明人是subway店员
陶哲轩再不懂政治 也比你强转贴: 川普的数学能力超过陶哲轩
陶哲轩的看法代表了华人主流我们这里左右争,TRUMP那边支持率猛增
K法官那天一开始就发难应该是事先商量好的策略我估计,bush还会下,hp女会升,trump难说。
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: trump话题: president话题: oliver话题: unfit
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
c****n
发帖数: 1108
1
http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/06/04/it-ought-to-be-common-knowledge-that-donald-trump-is-not-fit-for-the-presidency-of-the-united-states-of-america/
Proposition 1. The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Donald
Trump, is not even remotely qualified to carry out the duties of the
presidency of the United States of America.
Proof. I believe there are multiple proofs of Proposition 1. Clinton’s
argument, based primarily on foreign policy expertise and temperament, is my
favourite, but the other two arguments I linked to, of Mitt Romney and of
John Oliver, I think would also suffice; in addition to foreign policy
and temperament, Romney also discusses Trump’s lack of economic expertise,
and Oliver brings up Trump’s lack of regard for facts and their bearing on
policy (e.g. on Trump’s famous “border wall” proposal). One could also
demonstrate Proposition 1 by other means, for instance using his lack of
prior experience in any sort of public office or service, or his
demonstrated lack of regard for basic constitutional principles such as
freedom of the press and an independent judiciary. This is probably not an
exhaustive list of possible approaches to prove Proposition 1.
r*********e
发帖数: 7733
2
我都不知道他是谁。左逼们当根救命稻草似的。尼玛真是desperate。

【在 c****n 的大作中提到】
: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/06/04/it-ought-to-be-common-knowledge-that-donald-trump-is-not-fit-for-the-presidency-of-the-united-states-of-america/
: Proposition 1. The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Donald
: Trump, is not even remotely qualified to carry out the duties of the
: presidency of the United States of America.
: Proof. I believe there are multiple proofs of Proposition 1. Clinton’s
: argument, based primarily on foreign policy expertise and temperament, is my
: favourite, but the other two arguments I linked to, of Mitt Romney and of
: John Oliver, I think would also suffice; in addition to foreign policy
: and temperament, Romney also discusses Trump’s lack of economic expertise,
: and Oliver brings up Trump’s lack of regard for facts and their bearing on

C**********a
发帖数: 1472
3
Tao fit to be shit
l********n
发帖数: 759
4
陶哲轩的智商不知道比美新版上这些sb右派高多少
r**********f
发帖数: 2808
5
数学家陶哲轩说的非数学领域的东西,不比我家邻居们,我的同事们,周围开小店的更
高明。
j*********r
发帖数: 24733
6
看来选总统实在是太浪费钱,把所有选民的智商测一下,由智商最高的人指定总统肯定
又快又好。或者由智商最高的三五个人搞个委员会指定也可以,又快又好!!! 又快
又好!!!

【在 l********n 的大作中提到】
: 陶哲轩的智商不知道比美新版上这些sb右派高多少
W***o
发帖数: 6519
7
这个还不如算命准吧?

【在 c****n 的大作中提到】
: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/06/04/it-ought-to-be-common-knowledge-that-donald-trump-is-not-fit-for-the-presidency-of-the-united-states-of-america/
: Proposition 1. The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Donald
: Trump, is not even remotely qualified to carry out the duties of the
: presidency of the United States of America.
: Proof. I believe there are multiple proofs of Proposition 1. Clinton’s
: argument, based primarily on foreign policy expertise and temperament, is my
: favourite, but the other two arguments I linked to, of Mitt Romney and of
: John Oliver, I think would also suffice; in addition to foreign policy
: and temperament, Romney also discusses Trump’s lack of economic expertise,
: and Oliver brings up Trump’s lack of regard for facts and their bearing on

l********k
发帖数: 14844
8
中国著名科学家何祚庥早在十年前就已经用量子力学证明了三个代表的正确性。
u***n
发帖数: 10554
9
明天吃饭看到他我问问,现在他们应用数学喜欢和艺术政治什么的搅在一起。
a*******1
发帖数: 1554
10
右派的双重标准再次体现出来:
一开始说群氓政治,要由一小部分聪明人来决定;现在世界上最聪明的霍金、陶哲轩出
来说特朗普不适合当总统,右派又说他们政治上不聪明;政治上最聪明的两党政治家都
不赞同特朗普当总统,右派又说政治家太虚伪;业界最有钱的芒格、巴菲特、科赫都反
对特朗普当总统,右派又说这些人只会赚钱不懂政治。那么右派到底看上了什么人呢?
右派心里觉得什么人才聪明呢?于是右派给出了一个采访subway店员的视频,觉得这个
高中学历的subway店员才是聪明人。右派所说的common sense,意思是说这个拿着最低
工资的高中学历subway店员,他居然比陶哲轩、霍金、芒格、巴菲特、科赫、布隆伯格
更聪明?如果真是这样的话,我终于明白左右难以沟通的真正原因了——智商根本就不
在一个水平面上。。。。
相关主题
陶哲轩再不懂政治 也比你强从媒体反应来看陶这是投名状
陶哲轩的看法代表了华人主流揭秘川普对犯罪分子”以牙还牙“强硬政策的根源
K法官那天一开始就发难应该是事先商量好的策略川普2008年说希拉里会是个好总统 (转载)
进入USANews版参与讨论
h*******u
发帖数: 15326
11
傻逼,
选票说话

【在 c****n 的大作中提到】
: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/06/04/it-ought-to-be-common-knowledge-that-donald-trump-is-not-fit-for-the-presidency-of-the-united-states-of-america/
: Proposition 1. The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Donald
: Trump, is not even remotely qualified to carry out the duties of the
: presidency of the United States of America.
: Proof. I believe there are multiple proofs of Proposition 1. Clinton’s
: argument, based primarily on foreign policy expertise and temperament, is my
: favourite, but the other two arguments I linked to, of Mitt Romney and of
: John Oliver, I think would also suffice; in addition to foreign policy
: and temperament, Romney also discusses Trump’s lack of economic expertise,
: and Oliver brings up Trump’s lack of regard for facts and their bearing on

s*x
发帖数: 8041
12
先不管Trump到底合不合格,陶觉得希拉里,罗姆尼,和Oliver三个人的论断就足够了-
--感觉陶就是一政治白痴
I believe there are multiple proofs of Proposition 1. Clinton’s argument,
based primarily on foreign policy expertise and temperament, is my favourite
, but the other two arguments I linked to, of Mitt Romney and of John Oliver
, I think would also suffice
R******6
发帖数: 609
13
这家伙傻叉多少年了,每次都给媒体当猴耍,在美国民众中形象早已经臭了。
现在左逼把他抬出来,不要太乌龙好不好。
C**********a
发帖数: 1472
14
Tao is less than shit
J*8
发帖数: 616
15
标题太弱智了吧。

my
,
on

【在 c****n 的大作中提到】
: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/06/04/it-ought-to-be-common-knowledge-that-donald-trump-is-not-fit-for-the-presidency-of-the-united-states-of-america/
: Proposition 1. The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Donald
: Trump, is not even remotely qualified to carry out the duties of the
: presidency of the United States of America.
: Proof. I believe there are multiple proofs of Proposition 1. Clinton’s
: argument, based primarily on foreign policy expertise and temperament, is my
: favourite, but the other two arguments I linked to, of Mitt Romney and of
: John Oliver, I think would also suffice; in addition to foreign policy
: and temperament, Romney also discusses Trump’s lack of economic expertise,
: and Oliver brings up Trump’s lack of regard for facts and their bearing on

R******6
发帖数: 609
16
总统不需要是任何方面的专家,他需要的是领导国家走出困境,走向强大的政治理念。
陶这都不懂,还鬼扯什么?丢人。
希拉里的回答算是上路,“美国一直很强大”。不过鬼才信啊!有移民背景的人最清楚
S***p
发帖数: 19902
17
所以理解老毛对知识分子的态度了吧

【在 R******6 的大作中提到】
: 总统不需要是任何方面的专家,他需要的是领导国家走出困境,走向强大的政治理念。
: 陶这都不懂,还鬼扯什么?丢人。
: 希拉里的回答算是上路,“美国一直很强大”。不过鬼才信啊!有移民背景的人最清楚
: 。

g********2
发帖数: 6571
18

呵呵,这个好!

【在 l********k 的大作中提到】
: 中国著名科学家何祚庥早在十年前就已经用量子力学证明了三个代表的正确性。
M****o
发帖数: 4860
19
many think he does not have necessary and sufficient experience and or
knowledge to do a acceptable job as president for at least 51% of the
population, this has nothing to do with qualifications to be on the ballot
as one of the named candidates (or in general to be counted as an eligible
candidate )
there are three qualifications in the constitution:
“age, residency, and citizenship—that must be satisfied at the time of
taking office.”
it is common knowledge that he meets these three qualifications
how good or bad of a job someone will do if they are elected president is
entirely a different matter, it is subjective, not objective. Most
presidents have lower than 70% approval rating, if it is an academic class,
that is a fail.
who decides which people are fit to be president, the voters will, that is
how democracy works.
for example, the voters decided that Sarah Palin was unfit to be president
by not voting for her in sufficient enough numbers, however, she met the
qualifications to be president so that votes for her are counted as valid.
all this aside, to your point, getting the vote is a major part of becoming
the president, and all the republican candidates, regardless of how fit they
are in other respects, have proven beyond all doubt, they are profoundly
unfit to get the vote.
just imagine how much more profoundly unfit you would have to be at getting
votes, for Trump, who is profoundly unfit at everything else, to get
significantly more votes.
if common people are simple enough to be fooled by Trump, it should not be
overwhelmingly difficult to figure out what they want and give it to them.
each candidate knew how important it is to get the vote. if a candidate is
not fit enough to figure out how to beat Trump in the polls, I don’t think
that person is fit enough to be president.
It is the candidates job to convince the people they are fit. The polls are
an accurate indicator of how convinced the people are.
If it was J. Biden or E. Warren, I would vote for them rather than Trump on
their character alone, but I would rather vote for Trump than Clinton, so
that maybe after 4 years of Trump, they will feel enough of a need to run
for president to give the people what they really want.
I would rather vote for T. Tao than D. Trump, but T. Tao has not announced
that he is running.
is T. Tao more or less unfit to be president than D. Trump. How should I
know.
All I know is that T. Tao is as qualified as D. Trump to be president
according to the constitution.

my
,
on

【在 c****n 的大作中提到】
: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/06/04/it-ought-to-be-common-knowledge-that-donald-trump-is-not-fit-for-the-presidency-of-the-united-states-of-america/
: Proposition 1. The presumptive nominee of the Republican Party, Donald
: Trump, is not even remotely qualified to carry out the duties of the
: presidency of the United States of America.
: Proof. I believe there are multiple proofs of Proposition 1. Clinton’s
: argument, based primarily on foreign policy expertise and temperament, is my
: favourite, but the other two arguments I linked to, of Mitt Romney and of
: John Oliver, I think would also suffice; in addition to foreign policy
: and temperament, Romney also discusses Trump’s lack of economic expertise,
: and Oliver brings up Trump’s lack of regard for facts and their bearing on

C**********a
发帖数: 1472
20
Tao is shit.kill Tao shit .get out of USA.support trump.
相关主题
My dinner with Donald: No bombast, bullying or bluster我们这里左右争,TRUMP那边支持率猛增
右派眼中的聪明人是subway店员我估计,bush还会下,hp女会升,trump难说。
转贴: 川普的数学能力超过陶哲轩trump攻击carson屁都不懂,rubio被普金生吃
进入USANews版参与讨论
x****o
发帖数: 29677
21
搞数学的跑出来搞政治,吃饱了撑的
j*********r
发帖数: 24733
22
这说明,陶哲轩自己一定觉得拉稀痢,罗姆尼和Oliver这三个人的智商一定比他高,真
尼玛自卑啊。

了-
favourite
Oliver

【在 s*x 的大作中提到】
: 先不管Trump到底合不合格,陶觉得希拉里,罗姆尼,和Oliver三个人的论断就足够了-
: --感觉陶就是一政治白痴
: I believe there are multiple proofs of Proposition 1. Clinton’s argument,
: based primarily on foreign policy expertise and temperament, is my favourite
: , but the other two arguments I linked to, of Mitt Romney and of John Oliver
: , I think would also suffice

m***y
发帖数: 14763
23
John Oliver一定跟老汉的感觉一样,不知道这家伙是高级黑还是当真的。希拉里和罗
姆尼就比较郁闷了,正常人都能分清comedian和polictician的区别好吗?
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
我估计,bush还会下,hp女会升,trump难说。陶哲轩是美国的皇帝还是精神领袖?
trump攻击carson屁都不懂,rubio被普金生吃陶哲轩再不懂政治 也比你强
After SC GOP debate, I changed my mind on Trump陶哲轩的看法代表了华人主流
Romney今天接着骂TrumpK法官那天一开始就发难应该是事先商量好的策略
John Oliver cited by Fields Medalist Terence Tao (转载)从媒体反应来看陶这是投名状
陶哲轩这次算是丢人了揭秘川普对犯罪分子”以牙还牙“强硬政策的根源
陶哲轩是一个非常典型的学数学学傻了的人川普2008年说希拉里会是个好总统 (转载)
Trump is living rent-free in Obama's headMy dinner with Donald: No bombast, bullying or bluster
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: trump话题: president话题: oliver话题: unfit