g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 1 Research conducted by a notable African-American economist at Harvard
University has revealed a lack of racial bias in police shootings.
The research was conducted by Roland G. Fryer, who is the youngest black
professor to have received tenure status at Harvard. As Fryer expected, his
research revealed that police are more likely to use force towards an
African-American suspect. However, in what Fryer called “the most
surprising result of my career,” his research also revealed that African-
American suspects are less likely to be shot in an altercation with law
enforcement than suspects of other racial backgrounds.
According to the statistics used in Fryer’s study, officers are more likely
to fire their weapons without having first been attacked when the suspect
is white.
In officer-involved shootings in these cities, officers were more likely
to fire their weapons without having first been attacked when the suspects
were white. Black and white civilians involved in police shootings were
equally likely to have been carrying a weapon. Both of these results
undercut the idea that the police wield lethal force with racial bias.
Fryer’s research analyzed more than a thousand shootings in ten major
police departments. Houston, Austin, Dallas and Los Angeles, as well as
Orlando and Jacksonville, were among the cities included in the study.
When the law enforcement data from Houston was isolated specifically, Fryer
was able to conclude that law enforcement officers were significantly less
likely to shoot black suspects.
In tense situations, officers in Houston were about 20 percent less
likely to shoot a suspect if the suspect was black. This estimate was not
very precise, and firmer conclusions would require more data. But, in a
variety of models that controlled for different factors and used different
definitions of tense situations, Mr. Fryer found that blacks were either
less likely to be shot or there was no difference between blacks and whites.
The conclusions drawn by this research contradict much of the narrative that
is playing out in the media about police brutality. Most major media
outlets have been sympathetic to the cause of Black Lives Matter, an
activist movement that exists specifically to combat racially motivated
aggression towards African-Americans by law enforcement officers.
Although Fryer’s research supports the claim of law enforcement’s overuse
of force towards African-American suspects, his conclusion that law
enforcement officers do not disproportionally discharge their firearms at
black suspects should turn some heads. Perhaps the Black Lives Matter
movement should be asked to reconcile these revelations with their loud
response to the tragic shooting deaths of Alton Sterling and Philando
Castille that occurred last week.
Tom Ciccotta writes about Free Speech and Intellectual Diversity for
Breitbart. You can follow him on Twitter @tciccotta or on Facebook. You can
email him at [email protected]/* */ |
T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | 2 这个社会已经堕落成只有黑人的论证，只有黑人的吐槽，黑人的支持，才有说服力。真
是可悲啊。 |
T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | 3 虽然我同意他说的。但是我觉得他的吐槽绝对不够好。但是就因为他是黑人，所以左逼
才“有可能”听进去。
悲哀啊。
给华人左派推荐一个黑人的视频
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/USANews/31998241.html |
n******g
发帖数: 17225 | 4 学术界就是越偏商科的就越不那么左。这个教授是经济学的。
你让同样是哈佛的African American Studies系的教授独立去做研究，估计结论就不一
样了 |
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 5 那些垃圾非裔研究系就是靠挑拨种族矛盾吃饭。
【在 n******g 的大作中提到】
: 学术界就是越偏商科的就越不那么左。这个教授是经济学的。
: 你让同样是哈佛的African American Studies系的教授独立去做研究，估计结论就不一
: 样了
|
t*******s
发帖数: 492 | 6 没用的。1 不会有黑人看 2 哪怕看到了 反驳很简单：uncle tom. |
T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | 7 挑拨种族矛盾
这真是一针见血。我看美国的政治和媒体都是走这个偏门。
每个鸡毛蒜皮的事情都要上升到种族。
相对比而言，中国的种族矛盾就不那么尖锐。
【在 f**********n 的大作中提到】
: 那些垃圾非裔研究系就是靠挑拨种族矛盾吃饭。
|
t*******s
发帖数: 492 | 8 黑人唯一的希望就是宗教。宗教在一定程度上可以约束他们，并且让他们自强。但是现
在的黑人宗教领袖和民权领袖都忙着有意识无意识地强化种族冲突，从而提高自己的地
位和影响。如果没有了”敌人”，这些领袖也就没有了存在的价值。
【在 f**********n 的大作中提到】
: 那些垃圾非裔研究系就是靠挑拨种族矛盾吃饭。
|
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 9 这说明奥巴马的所谓“data”有问题，他公开宣称很多studies证明警察对黑人有bias
，黑人比白人多几倍的可能被警察盘问和打死。
但他并没拿出所谓data的来源，也没有给出任何一个study的出处。
如果不是他这样煽动，根本不会有BLM，更不会有今天这样激烈的反警现象。 |
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 10 他的数据就是简单地说，为啥黑人坐牢的比例比总人口里的黑人比例高那么多？
他们支持AA的逻辑也是一样，为啥上大学的黑人比例比总人口里黑人比例低那么多？
这俩问题本身都是好问题，只是解决方法不是简单地让差生上好大学，不抓黑人坐牢。
这些解决方法就如同
提着汽油救火
请发春上课
信日日发誓。
bias
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
: 这说明奥巴马的所谓“data”有问题，他公开宣称很多studies证明警察对黑人有bias
: ，黑人比白人多几倍的可能被警察盘问和打死。
: 但他并没拿出所谓data的来源，也没有给出任何一个study的出处。
: 如果不是他这样煽动，根本不会有BLM，更不会有今天这样激烈的反警现象。
|
