由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 川普上台,到底会有哪些危险?
相关主题
绝不能把权力交给嗜权如狂的人!希拉里的电邮,可能早被中国看了个够
希拉里当选将是美国人民的噩梦!克太在交出email之前修改了email
无脸见三粉,希拉里三德子取消共同拉励Clinton跟BLM打起来了,哈哈哈哈
希拉里咆哮, 给中产加税,巴菲特鼓掌川普对克林顿的真实看法
极右脑库national review要准备背书希拉里板上的左逼们,你们赞不赞成Bill Clinton的这两段话?
BLM Founder: The Clintons Use Black For VotesIce Cube 控诉希拉里对黑人开战
Don't cry for Hillary, AmericaHillary Clinton has a seizure on camera
为什么当国务卿时能搞基金会,当总统时不能?Marcus: 3 Simple Reasons Why Trump Will Win
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: trump话题: obama话题: he话题: hillary话题: donald
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
g********2
发帖数: 6571
1
August 9, 2016
Trump Is Dangerous?
By G. Murphy Donovan
All we know about Donald Trump’s policy is what he says, not what he has
done or will do. Trump has no policy track record. He has never held office.
Intimations of what he might do are often vague, too. Yet, beneath the
rhetorical bluster, a few broad, if not salutary, strokes are evident.
Domestically, he says that he would end the fiasco that is open borders,
especially the reckless importation of unvetted Mexicans and Muslims. He
also claims to be the law and order candidate. Presumably, his focus would
be on terrorists, extra-legal entrants, immigrant felons, and repeat
offenders who abuse porous borders and so-called “sanctuary” cities. Trump
has little patience either with cop killers or the organizations that
sponsor hate speech directed against police. BLM takes a bow here.
Like his predicate, the eccentric Teddy Roosevelt, Trump also says that he
will shake up Wall Street, bank monopolies, and the free-trade grifters that
have turned the American economy into a slush fund for indifferent elites,
right and left. Trump implies that America has the best politicians that
money can buy. His prime exhibit for that charge is the Clintons. If
evidence matters, Trump’s identification of the Hillary cartel as political
pathology, not civic solution, is spot on. The Republican standard bearer
also says that the “system” on both sides of the political aisle is “
rigged” by a political culture that allows anti-democratic fixers like the
Clintons to thrive.
The “crooked” Hillary meme is now validated by an avalanche of fact. The
Benghazi cover-up, the rigged FBI “investigation” of Clinton’s private
server, and the more recent rigged DNC national nominating convention are
but three recent examples that come to mind.
The great irony of the “crooked Hillary” consensus is that any credible
vetting of the Clintons must now be done by hackers, Julian Assange, and
WikiLeaks. With the Hillary tilt, US media has again squandered its single
digit objectivity rating on another Clinton shyster.
Pairs of breeding lawyers in the White House have proved to be a toxic if
not ruinous mix.
Throughout, print and TV shills would have us believe conspiracy theories
about sinister machinations between Donald Trump, Julian Assange, and
Vladimir Putin. Every Clinton crime now gets to wear the burka of conspiracy
. With Bill, it was the “vast right wing conspiracy.” With Hillary now it
’s Trump, WikiLeaks, and the Russians.
Donald Trump also suggests that the time has come to reevaluate foreign
policy alliances including NATO. Clearly, EU regime change policies and
feckless Muslim small wars have been colossal failures. NATO’s bear-baiting
and EU imperialism have done little or nothing to attrite the jihad or halt
the spread of Islamism and terror. The world is not a safer place under
NATO or team Obama.
Between regime change meddling and NATO expansion, the EU and America now
underwrite a new Cold War with Russia whilst losing multiple hot wars with
Islam.
Donald Trump is not responsible for any of this, not a single domestic,
military, or foreign policy disaster.
If you read between the lines, Trump’s great failing is truth. He is
pilloried for pointing the finger of shame at team Obama and a generation of
policy fiasco and incompetence. Indeed, the authors of failure, including
Barack Obama, have taken to asserting that Trump is “dangerous.”
Really? By what abuse of reason is the depressed state of the union and
foreign affairs fiasco a function of anything Trump has ever said or done?
If the truth were told, President Obama has taken a page from the Clinton
playbook. When confronted with the US-sponsored Libya coup blowback, the
president refers to yet another failed Muslim state as a “shit show,”
blaming “tribalism” and negligent Europeans. Like Hillary, the Obama ethic
is the absence of personal responsibility. Somehow the political disaster
that is “humanitarian intervention” in the Obama era is someone else’s
fault. And somehow we are to believe that Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin
are dangerous men.
Shakespeare once suggested that the purpose of theater is to “hold a mirror
up to nature.” Indeed, a cinema icon with five decades of standing did
just that the other day. Clint Eastwood captured the Clinton/Obama culture
in an interview with Esquire.
That's the kiss-ass generation we're in right now. We're really in a pussy
generation. Everybody's walking on eggshells. We see people accusing people
of being racist and all kinds of stuff. When I grew up, those things weren't
called racist. And then when I did Gran Torino, even my associate said, "
This is a really good script, but it's politically incorrect." And I said, "
Good. Let me read it tonight." The next morning, I came in and I threw it on
his desk and I said, "We're starting this immediately.
Mister Eastwood’s choice of a euphemism for female genitalia for a metaphor
is no accident. We live in a culture of girly men, manly women, and a
sizable slice that couldn’t make either team. Real men are now an
endangered species.
The best thing to be said about the Obama era might be that it will be over
in a few months. If and when a definitive film is made of the political
correctness era, let’s pray that Clint Eastwood writes the screenplay and
directs the film. Eastwood is one of the few auteurs that might do justice
to the Clintons, the Obamas, and the “pussy generation.”
All we know about Donald Trump’s policy is what he says, not what he has
done or will do. Trump has no policy track record. He has never held office.
Intimations of what he might do are often vague, too. Yet, beneath the
rhetorical bluster, a few broad, if not salutary, strokes are evident.
Domestically, he says that he would end the fiasco that is open borders,
especially the reckless importation of unvetted Mexicans and Muslims. He
also claims to be the law and order candidate. Presumably, his focus would
be on terrorists, extra-legal entrants, immigrant felons, and repeat
offenders who abuse porous borders and so-called “sanctuary” cities. Trump
has little patience either with cop killers or the organizations that
sponsor hate speech directed against police. BLM takes a bow here.
Like his predicate, the eccentric Teddy Roosevelt, Trump also says that he
will shake up Wall Street, bank monopolies, and the free-trade grifters that
have turned the American economy into a slush fund for indifferent elites,
right and left. Trump implies that America has the best politicians that
money can buy. His prime exhibit for that charge is the Clintons. If
evidence matters, Trump’s identification of the Hillary cartel as political
pathology, not civic solution, is spot on. The Republican standard bearer
also says that the “system” on both sides of the political aisle is “
rigged” by a political culture that allows anti-democratic fixers like the
Clintons to thrive.
The “crooked” Hillary meme is now validated by an avalanche of fact. The
Benghazi cover-up, the rigged FBI “investigation” of Clinton’s private
server, and the more recent rigged DNC national nominating convention are
but three recent examples that come to mind.
The great irony of the “crooked Hillary” consensus is that any credible
vetting of the Clintons must now be done by hackers, Julian Assange, and
WikiLeaks. With the Hillary tilt, US media has again squandered its single
digit objectivity rating on another Clinton shyster.
Pairs of breeding lawyers in the White House have proved to be a toxic if
not ruinous mix.
Throughout, print and TV shills would have us believe conspiracy theories
about sinister machinations between Donald Trump, Julian Assange, and
Vladimir Putin. Every Clinton crime now gets to wear the burka of conspiracy
. With Bill, it was the “vast right wing conspiracy.” With Hillary now it
’s Trump, WikiLeaks, and the Russians.
Donald Trump also suggests that the time has come to reevaluate foreign
policy alliances including NATO. Clearly, EU regime change policies and
feckless Muslim small wars have been colossal failures. NATO’s bear-baiting
and EU imperialism have done little or nothing to attrite the jihad or halt
the spread of Islamism and terror. The world is not a safer place under
NATO or team Obama.
Between regime change meddling and NATO expansion, the EU and America now
underwrite a new Cold War with Russia whilst losing multiple hot wars with
Islam.
Donald Trump is not responsible for any of this, not a single domestic,
military, or foreign policy disaster.
If you read between the lines, Trump’s great failing is truth. He is
pilloried for pointing the finger of shame at team Obama and a generation of
policy fiasco and incompetence. Indeed, the authors of failure, including
Barack Obama, have taken to asserting that Trump is “dangerous.”
Really? By what abuse of reason is the depressed state of the union and
foreign affairs fiasco a function of anything Trump has ever said or done?
If the truth were told, President Obama has taken a page from the Clinton
playbook. When confronted with the US-sponsored Libya coup blowback, the
president refers to yet another failed Muslim state as a “shit show,”
blaming “tribalism” and negligent Europeans. Like Hillary, the Obama ethic
is the absence of personal responsibility. Somehow the political disaster
that is “humanitarian intervention” in the Obama era is someone else’s
fault. And somehow we are to believe that Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin
are dangerous men.
Shakespeare once suggested that the purpose of theater is to “hold a mirror
up to nature.” Indeed, a cinema icon with five decades of standing did
just that the other day. Clint Eastwood captured the Clinton/Obama culture
in an interview with Esquire.
That's the kiss-ass generation we're in right now. We're really in a pussy
generation. Everybody's walking on eggshells. We see people accusing people
of being racist and all kinds of stuff. When I grew up, those things weren't
called racist. And then when I did Gran Torino, even my associate said, "
This is a really good script, but it's politically incorrect." And I said, "
Good. Let me read it tonight." The next morning, I came in and I threw it on
his desk and I said, "We're starting this immediately.
Mister Eastwood’s choice of a euphemism for female genitalia for a metaphor
is no accident. We live in a culture of girly men, manly women, and a
sizable slice that couldn’t make either team. Real men are now an
endangered species.
The best thing to be said about the Obama era might be that it will be over
in a few months. If and when a definitive film is made of the political
correctness era, let’s pray that Clint Eastwood writes the screenplay and
directs the film. Eastwood is one of the few auteurs that might do justice
to the Clintons, the Obamas, and the “pussy generation.”
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/08/trump_is_dangerous.html#ixzz4GqViioO7
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
g********2
发帖数: 6571
2
Domestically, he says that he would end the fiasco that is open borders,
especially the reckless importation of unvetted Mexicans and Muslims. He
also claims to be the law and order candidate. Presumably, his focus would
be on terrorists, extra-legal entrants, immigrant felons, and repeat
offenders who abuse porous borders and so-called “sanctuary” cities. Trump
has little patience either with cop killers or the organizations that
sponsor hate speech directed against police. BLM takes a bow here.
——守住国境,抵制国内外恐怖分子,严惩杀警凶手以及一切针对警察的仇恨活动。
这不是很安全的措施吗?为什么说川普危险?
w***7
发帖数: 5568
3
缅因大龙虾变路易斯安那小龙虾就是最大危险
r****u
发帖数: 618
4
很简单啊,因为他们就是恐怖分子和杀警凶手,当然觉得危险了

:Domestically, he says that he would end the fiasco that is open borders,
:especially the reckless importation of unvetted Mexicans and Muslims. He
:also claims to be the law and order candidate. Presumably, his focus would
:be on terrorists, extra-legal entrants, immigrant felons, and repeat
:offenders who abuse porous borders and so-called “sanctuary” cities.
Trumphas little patience either with cop killers or the organizations that
:sponsor hate speech directed against police. BLM takes a bow here.
:——守住国境,抵制国内外恐怖分子,严惩杀警凶手以及一切针对警察的仇恨活动。
:这不是很安全的措施吗?为什么说川普危险?

【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
: Domestically, he says that he would end the fiasco that is open borders,
: especially the reckless importation of unvetted Mexicans and Muslims. He
: also claims to be the law and order candidate. Presumably, his focus would
: be on terrorists, extra-legal entrants, immigrant felons, and repeat
: offenders who abuse porous borders and so-called “sanctuary” cities. Trump
: has little patience either with cop killers or the organizations that
: sponsor hate speech directed against police. BLM takes a bow here.
: ——守住国境,抵制国内外恐怖分子,严惩杀警凶手以及一切针对警察的仇恨活动。
: 这不是很安全的措施吗?为什么说川普危险?

1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
Marcus: 3 Simple Reasons Why Trump Will Win极右脑库national review要准备背书希拉里
连 MSNBC 也说希拉里的服务器有敏感信息了BLM Founder: The Clintons Use Black For Votes
Hillary's only qualification to be presidentDon't cry for Hillary, America
Khizr Khan has no shame为什么当国务卿时能搞基金会,当总统时不能?
绝不能把权力交给嗜权如狂的人!希拉里的电邮,可能早被中国看了个够
希拉里当选将是美国人民的噩梦!克太在交出email之前修改了email
无脸见三粉,希拉里三德子取消共同拉励Clinton跟BLM打起来了,哈哈哈哈
希拉里咆哮, 给中产加税,巴菲特鼓掌川普对克林顿的真实看法
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: trump话题: obama话题: he话题: hillary话题: donald