f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 6 属实。
譬如，托马斯对左派法官对流产诊所有利的判决不满的主要原因如下
That decision exemplifies the Court’s
troubling tendency “to bend the rules when any effort to
limit abortion, or even to speak in opposition to abortion,
is at issue.” Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U. S. 914, 954 (2000)
(Scalia, J., dissenting). As JUSTICE ALITO observes, see
post (dissenting opinion), today’s decision creates an abor-
tion exception to ordinary rules of res judicata, ignores
compelling evidence that Texas’ law imposes no unconsti-
tutional burden, and disregards basic principles of the
severability doctrine.
而维基上是引用了左媒纽时的观点如下
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, stating that the majority "
reimagines the undue-burden standard" for abortion access, creating a "
benefits-and-burdens balancing test" that courts should have instead
deferred to the legislatures to resolve.
维基丢弃了托马斯的最主要观点，而只抓住一点点技术细节。
维基
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_Woman%27s_Health_v._Hellerstedt
高院判决
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-274diff_97bf.pdf
【在 f***e 的大作中提到】
: 作弊一直都是双重标准
|
