由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
WaterWorld版 - 维基解密:6.4的屠杀真的发生了吗?来自智利外交官和纽约时报的 (转载)
相关主题
China ex-premier's memoirs defend 1989 bloodshed我怎么argue掉这个罚单呢?
刚刚发现wikileaks已经登陆不上了今天老板叫我跟他一起去看神韵,我改怎么办? (转载)
平等,真正的精神食粮 zt卡扎菲: 就象1989年北京天安门广场上一样
侃侃韩寒与《纽约客》犹太人会给拒不道歉的德国人(假设)祈福吗?
忽发奇想,世界上有没有不下雨的地方?六四10张令人难忘的照片(组图) (转载)
话说昨天纽约枪击案,9个受伤的全是警察打的【必看】中国日报引用维基泄密“天安门大屠杀的未知数”(带中文注解)
主张禁枪的,进来看,事实说话。VT的风水
只看到肛男滥杀无辜了,什么时候反抗暴政啊?柴玲真猥琐 (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: square话题: beijing话题: chinese话题: tiananmen
进入WaterWorld版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
c******i
发帖数: 94
1
【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: changchi (oxo), 信区: Military
标 题: 维基解密:6.4的屠杀真的发生了吗?来自智利外交官和纽约时报的北京站站长的目击
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jun 3 10:04:05 2014, 美东)
WikiLeaks confirms it Tiananmen Square ‘massacre’ was a myth。
The most recent is a WikiLeaks release of cables sent from the U.S. Embassy
in Beijing to the State Department in June 1989, a few days after the events
in China.
Second is an assertion in November 1989 by the Beijing bureau chief of the
New York Times, an assertion that has never again been referred to by that
newspaper.
And third is the account of what happened by the Chinese government itself,
which is corroborated by the first two.
Only one major Western newspaper has published the WikiLeaks cables. That
was the Telegraph of London on June 4 of this year, exactly 22 years after
the Chinese government called out the troops in Beijing.
Two cables dated July 7, 1989 — more than a month after the fighting —
related the following:
“A Chilean diplomat provides an eye-witness account of the soldiers
entering Tiananmen Square: He watched the military enter the square and did
not observe any mass firing of weapons into the crowds, although sporadic
gunfire was heard. He said that most of the troops which entered the square
were actually armed only with anti-riot gear — truncheons and wooden clubs;
they were backed up by armed soldiers.”
A following cable stated: “A Chilean diplomat provides an eye-witness
account of the soldiers entering Tiananmen Square: Although gunfire could be
heard, he said that apart from some beating of students, there was no mass
firing into the crowd of students at the monument.”
It should be remembered that Chile at that time was ruled by Gen. Augusto
Pinochet, who had come to power in a violent, anti-socialist, U.S.-supported
right-wing coup in which thousands of leftists, including President
Salvador Allende, had been killed. The “Chilean diplomat” referred to
would have been no friend of China.
Not one U.S. newspaper, television or radio outlet has reported or commented
on these cables released by WikiLeaks, nor on the Telegraph story about
them. It is as though they fell into a bottomless chasm.
Is it because the media here don’t believe the report is credible? Hardly.
They knew the truth in 1989
The New York Times knows it’s credible. Their own Beijing bureau chief at
the time, Nicholas Kristof, confirmed it in an extensive article entitled “
China Update: How the Hardliners Won,” published in the Sunday Times
magazine on Nov. 12, 1989, five months after the supposed massacre in the
square.
At the very end of this long article, which purported to give an inside view
of a debate within the Chinese Communist Party leadership, Kristof stated
categorically: “Based on my observations in the streets, neither the
official account nor many of the foreign versions are quite correct. There
is no massacre in Tiananmen Square, for example, although there is plenty of
killing elsewhere.”
Even though Kristof’s article was harshly critical of China, his statement
that there was “no massacre in Tiananmen Square” immediately drew howls of
protest from China bashers in the U.S., as reflected in the Times’ letters
column.
Had there been fighting in Beijing? Absolutely. But there was no massacre of
unarmed students in the square. That was an invention by the West, intended
to demonize the Chinese government and win public sympathy for a counter-
revolution.
The turn toward a market economy under Deng Xiaoping had alienated many
workers. There was also a counter-revolutionary element trying to take
advantage of popular grievances to completely restore capitalism.
The imperialists were hoping the struggles in Beijing would bring down the
Chinese Communist Party and destroy the planned economy — similar to what
was to happen two years later in the Soviet Union. They wanted to “open up
” China, not to truth, but to the looting of the people’s property by
imperialist banks and corporations.
After much wavering at the top, the army was called out and the uprising
crushed. China was not broken up like the Soviet Union; its economy has not
imploded nor has the standard of living declined. Quite the opposite. Wages
and social conditions have been improving at a time when workers elsewhere
are being forced backward by a severe capitalist economic crisis.
Despite deep concessions to capitalism, foreign and domestic, China
continues to have a planned economy based on a strong state-owned
infrastructure.
Email: d*******[email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------
Articles copyright 1995-2011 Workers World. Verbatim copying and
distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without
royalty provided this notice is preserved.
P**5
发帖数: 7467
2
http://www.64memo.com/html/victims155.htm
六四死難者名單
(共186名﹐經與丁子霖教授核對 2006年6月)
P**5
发帖数: 7467
3
備注:此186位死難者名單中,有20位尚不知姓名或有姓無名,這裡有兩种情況:一為
親屬暫時不願公布死者姓名;二為暫時尚未找到死者親屬的下落,屬於這一類者,至少
要有兩位目擊者證明。至於大量有所傳聞而無可靠目擊者證明之死者概不收集。
P**5
发帖数: 7467
4
1 (共1页)
进入WaterWorld版参与讨论
相关主题
柴玲真猥琐 (转载)忽发奇想,世界上有没有不下雨的地方?
Guns are evil话说昨天纽约枪击案,9个受伤的全是警察打的
天安门袭击案真相 (转载)主张禁枪的,进来看,事实说话。
跟一个白人校友的一些对话 (转载)只看到肛男滥杀无辜了,什么时候反抗暴政啊?
China ex-premier's memoirs defend 1989 bloodshed我怎么argue掉这个罚单呢?
刚刚发现wikileaks已经登陆不上了今天老板叫我跟他一起去看神韵,我改怎么办? (转载)
平等,真正的精神食粮 zt卡扎菲: 就象1989年北京天安门广场上一样
侃侃韩寒与《纽约客》犹太人会给拒不道歉的德国人(假设)祈福吗?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: square话题: beijing话题: chinese话题: tiananmen