S*********i
发帖数: 8614 | 1 tp://bbs.goalhi.com/2072384.html
Two goals from Alexandre Pato and another from Antonio Cassano sent Milan
five points clear of Inter.
帕托的两个进球和卡萨诺的锦上添花让米兰领先国米5分。
Max Allegri started Pato and Robinho upfront in Zlatan Ibrahimovic’s
absence. Clarence Seedorf played on the left of midfield, and Gianluca
Zambrotta got a surprise start at left-back.
在伊布拉希莫维奇缺阵的情况下，阿莱格里用帕托和罗比尼奥作为先发锋线。西多夫首
发的位置是左中场，赞布罗塔令人惊讶地作为左后卫先发。
Leonardo chose to play 4-2-1-3 rather than 4-3-1-2. Javier Zanetti played at
left-back, and both Cristian Chivu and Andrea Ranocchia were fit to start
– Lucio was suspended.
莱昂纳多选择了4-2-1-3阵型而不是4-3-1-2。萨内蒂踢左后卫，齐沃和拉诺基亚的身体
状况适合先发——卢西奥停赛了。
The game got off to a sensational start – Pato scored the opener after just
44 seconds, and Milan were immediately in charge.
比赛一开场就让人兴奋——仅过44秒帕托就首开记录，米兰立即掌握了主动。
Midfield battle
中场大战
The key to the game was the midfield battle, where Milan had a 4 v 3
advantage. As a result, they dominated possession and all four players
played their roles well – Mark van Bommel sat, Rino Gattuso shuttled and
doubled up against Samuel Eto’o, Clarence Seedorf was the most ‘free’
player and carried the ball well, whilst Kevin-Prince Boateng drove forward
and connected the midfield and attack. Boateng also provided an aerial
presence for long goal-kicks forward, which was quite useful – as Inter’s
forwards occupied Milan’s defenders, Christian Abbiati couldn’t play out
from the back, and neither could he play long to Robinho or Pato, who lack
height and aerial prowess.
比赛关键在于中场对决，米兰在此处有4打3的优势。结果是，他们掌握了控球优势，四
名队员都很好地发挥了自己的作用——范博梅尔坐镇后方，加图索来回奔跑，并协防埃
托奥，西多夫是四人里最“自由”的球员，很好地控制了皮球，而博阿滕压上连接中场
和锋线。博阿滕还给门将开大脚球提供了空中支点，这相当有用——由于国米的前锋对
上了米兰的后卫，阿比亚蒂不能把球传给后卫；他也不能长传给罗比尼奥或帕托，这两
人缺少高度和制空能力。
There were some interesting duels in the midfield. Gattuso started playing
high up, putting pressure on Thiago Motta when he moved forward with the
ball, but Gattuso soon dropped deeper and spent more time moving out towards
Eto’o, who wasn’t very effective in wide positions as a result. Mark van
Bommel tracked Wesley Sneijder well, though was happy to let him drift into
deeper positions unoccupied. On the other hand, when Milan had possession in
the early stages, Sneidjer dropped deep and let van Bommel have time on the
ball – but later on moved forward to mark him, and Milan weren’t able to
use van Bommel as a pivot.
中场的一些对位颇有意思。加图索开场的位置靠上，当莫塔带球向前时就给他施加压力
；但随即回撤，更多时候移到埃托奥这一侧，这也使得后者在边路不太有效。范博梅尔
很好地盯住了斯内德，尽管乐于让后者不受阻碍地游动到靠后的位置。另一方面，当米
兰在比赛早段控球的时候，斯内德回收让范博梅尔去控球——但之后就上前盯防，这让
米兰没法将范博梅尔用作一个支点。
With both defences defending relatively deep (Milan more so than Inter, who
moved higher up the pitch as the game went on), the midfield zone was
stretched and very open. Inter were essentially overpowered in this zone,
and Leonardo really needed an extra body in midfield to help Inter compete.
He decided to start with Goran Pandev on the right – he may have regretted
not using Dejan Stankovic, because that would have given him more
flexibility to move between systems. The use of Sneijder and three forwards
meant he was tied to 4-2-1-3.
由于双方防线靠后（米兰比国米更甚，后者随比赛进行压得更靠上），中场区域被拉伸
了，显得相当开放。国米在这一区域基本上是被压制了，实际上莱昂纳多在中场需要再
多一人协助国米竞争。他决定把潘德夫放在右路先发——或许他会后悔没用斯坦科维奇
，因为那样的话会有更大的弹性来进行变阵。用斯内德加三前锋意味着他得固守4-2-1-
3。
Inter defence
国米防线
Despite Milan’s obvious midfield advantage, they were at their most
threatening when they played quick, direct football, rather than working the
ball gradually forward. With Inter behind from the first minute and
therefore pushing both Maicon and Javier Zanetti up the pitch straight away,
they often had 2 v 2 at the back.
尽管米兰有着明显的中场优势，他们最有威胁的时候出现在采取快速、直接踢法的时候
，而不是将球逐渐推进的时候。国米从第一分钟起就处于落后，从而把麦孔和萨内蒂都
立即推上前线，他们在后方通常是2打2的局面。
Ranocchia and Chivu simply couldn’t deal with the pace of Pato and Robinho,
who started from the channels and made diagonal runs into the centre of the
pitch, in behind the defence. Really, Inter needed an extra man at the back
, or at least a full-back playing a more conservative role, and in a
position to cover when Milan broke quickly.
拉诺基亚和齐沃就是没法跟上帕托和罗比尼奥的速度，后者在边路启动斜插到中路，把
后卫甩在身后。国米确实需要多一人在后方，后者至少得有一名边后卫踢得更保守些，
当米兰快速反击的时候能在协防的位置上。
It was the first time Ranocchia and Chivu had started together at the back,
and there was clearly no understanding between the two. Chivu was the most
vulnerable. He became drawn up the pitch too easily, and then didn’t have
the pace to turn and recover his position. Ranocchia and Zanetti had to
cover on separate occasions when Pato went through in the first half.
拉诺基亚和齐沃是第一次搭档中卫首发，彼此显然没有默契。齐沃最容易受攻击。他很
容易被吸引出来，然后又没速度转回到自己的位置。拉诺基亚和萨内蒂在上半场不同场
合都需要过来补位，当帕托突进的时候。
It should also be noted that Milan’s midfield advantage meant there was
often no Inter pressure on the ball for passes over the top. Pato was also
guilty of not using his pace enough – turning back into play rather than
motoring towards goal.
同样值得注意的是，米兰的中场优势意味着国米对于过顶传球通常没有施加压力。帕托
也错在没有充分利用自己的速度——更多地是向回走而不是向前冲。
Inter had their chances, though. Both came from wide areas (where they
naturally were more of a threat than Milan). Motta’s header from a corner
was brilliantly saved by Christian Abbiati, whilst Eto’o somehow shot wide
at the far post after a Pandev cross.
不过国米也有机会。两次机会都来自边路（这里他们自然比米兰更有威胁）。莫塔接角
球开出的头球攻门被阿比亚蒂漂亮地扑住，而埃托奥接潘德夫传中则射偏了。
Second half
下半场
The game was decided soon after half time. Inevitably, the key moment
involved Chivu being caught out for pace in behind – Pato got the ball in
Milan’s centre-left channel, was through on goal, but cut across the pitch
and was tripped by Chivu. The Romanian was sent off, and Ivan Cordoba
replaced Pandev as Inter went 4-2-1-2ish.
下半场开始不久比赛就大局已定了。无可避免地，关键时刻出现在齐沃速度跟不上的时
候——帕托接中左路的直塞球内切突破，被齐沃绊倒。罗马尼亚人被罚出场，科尔多巴
替下潘德夫，国米打类似4-2-1-2的阵型。
Milan made very good use of their extra man (in stark contrast to how they
failed to adapt (under Leonardo) when Jose Mourinho’s Inter went down to
ten men in this fixture last year). They suddenly had their full-backs
completely free, and spread the ball from flank to flank, stretching the
play and making Inter’s ten men work harder. The goal came when Ignazio
Abate (the poorest player in the first Milan derby of the season, but very
good here) motored forward and crossed for Pato’s second.
米兰很好地利用了他们多打一人的优势（和去年他们面对穆里尼奥的国米也是11打10时
欠缺章法的状况形成鲜明对比）。他们突然完全解放了两名边后卫，不断把球分边，拉
宽阵型，让国米场上的十人更加忙碌。阿巴特压上传中制造了帕托的第二个进球（前者
是本赛季第一回合米兰德比表现最差的人，不过本场表现非常好）。
That was essentially game over. Milan continued to be a threat with balls
over the top, and Robinho should have taken advantage of these situations.
His replacement, Antonio Cassano, won and scored a penalty in stoppage time,
before being sent off.
比赛基本已经结束。米兰继续用过顶球制造威胁，罗比尼奥本应抓住那些机会。替补他
上场的卡萨诺在补时阶段赢得点球并亲自罚进，随后被罚下。
Conclusion
结论
A clear tactical victory for Allegri – or perhaps, more of a defeat for
Leonardo. Inter were exposed in two different ways – they were outnumbered
and outbattled in midfield, whilst also amazingly vulnerable at the back to
balls over the top. Inter didn’t do well enough without the ball – the
wide forwards, in particular, didn’t help out enough – which has echoes of
Milan under Leonardo last year, particularly away at Manchester United.
阿莱格里战术上一次明显的胜利——又或许，更多地是莱昂纳多的一次失败。国米在两
方面暴露了缺陷——他们在中场以少打多不敌对方，同时后防线又屡受过顶球侵扰。国
米在无球时做得不够好——尤其是边锋，没有给到足够的帮助——让人回想到去年莱昂
纳多治下米兰的情况，尤其是客场面对曼联的时候。
Milan may have been helped by Ibrahimovic’s absence. Though he was the key
man in the fixture earlier in the season (and his pace was a threat, winning
the penalty in that game), Milan enjoyed having too very mobile players who
played in the channels, rather with a more static focal point for the
attack. Their two experienced Dutchman also had great games in the centre –
van Bommel broke things up and distributed the ball wide, whilst Seedorf
played intelligent balls higher up.
伊布拉希莫维奇的缺阵或许帮了米兰。尽管他在本赛季第一回合的对决中是关键先生（
他的步伐有威胁，在比赛中赢得了点球），但米兰在进攻中采用两名机动性很强、善于
在边路活动的球员，比起使用一个相对静态的支点更有成效。他们阵中两名经验丰富的
荷兰人在中路同样有着优异表现——范博梅尔阻截和分边，而西多夫在前场踢得很聪明
。 |
|
