f****g 发帖数: 4248 | 1 买了个ACER laptop,今天给我说,硬盘是285G,不是320G.要退。还不出运费。我日哦。
原来看到那么多说同胞的,我还半信半疑。NY的。是在BBS上混的不? | J********i 发帖数: 50662 | 2 patpat
遇到白痴了
哦。
【在 f****g 的大作中提到】 : 买了个ACER laptop,今天给我说,硬盘是285G,不是320G.要退。还不出运费。我日哦。 : 原来看到那么多说同胞的,我还半信半疑。NY的。是在BBS上混的不?
| a***e 发帖数: 38850 | | HQ 发帖数: 19201 | 4 那你有没有跟他解释呢?
哦。
【在 f****g 的大作中提到】 : 买了个ACER laptop,今天给我说,硬盘是285G,不是320G.要退。还不出运费。我日哦。 : 原来看到那么多说同胞的,我还半信半疑。NY的。是在BBS上混的不?
| f****g 发帖数: 4248 | 5 他上来就说Not-as-described. 要full refund 加return shipping.我正在查是咋回事
呢。
应该是安装的软件会占部分硬盘,但是差距不应该这么大。
各位高人,有没有合理的解释?
【在 HQ 的大作中提到】 : 那你有没有跟他解释呢? : : 哦。
| HQ 发帖数: 19201 | 6 ft,看来是庸医碰上弱智,呵呵
【在 f****g 的大作中提到】 : 他上来就说Not-as-described. 要full refund 加return shipping.我正在查是咋回事 : 呢。 : 应该是安装的软件会占部分硬盘,但是差距不应该这么大。 : 各位高人,有没有合理的解释?
| a******n 发帖数: 11246 | 7 system recovery占用了不少把。
我相信google一下肯定有很多文章关于这个的。
但就是怕他不是真的sb,是evil...
【在 f****g 的大作中提到】 : 他上来就说Not-as-described. 要full refund 加return shipping.我正在查是咋回事 : 呢。 : 应该是安装的软件会占部分硬盘,但是差距不应该这么大。 : 各位高人,有没有合理的解释?
| f****g 发帖数: 4248 | 8 Q神,请指教。我很诚心的。
【在 HQ 的大作中提到】 : ft,看来是庸医碰上弱智,呵呵
| f****g 发帖数: 4248 | 9 谢谢指点。我正在Google。
【在 a******n 的大作中提到】 : system recovery占用了不少把。 : 我相信google一下肯定有很多文章关于这个的。 : 但就是怕他不是真的sb,是evil...
| HQ 发帖数: 19201 | 10 你自己没用过笔记本?
至少是,6年前,笔记本硬盘都会被分出来一块儿做recovery用的
如果你用PartitionMagic之类软件,就能重新分回来。
【在 f****g 的大作中提到】 : Q神,请指教。我很诚心的。
| | | d***y 发帖数: 5325 | 11 进CMOS看硬盘的一些参数可看出硬盘确切容量
【在 HQ 的大作中提到】 : 你自己没用过笔记本? : 至少是,6年前,笔记本硬盘都会被分出来一块儿做recovery用的 : 如果你用PartitionMagic之类软件,就能重新分回来。
| f****g 发帖数: 4248 | 12 我猜是这样的,但是从没留意个。还好不是笨到家,:)))
谢了,Q神。
【在 HQ 的大作中提到】 : 你自己没用过笔记本? : 至少是,6年前,笔记本硬盘都会被分出来一块儿做recovery用的 : 如果你用PartitionMagic之类软件,就能重新分回来。
| HQ 发帖数: 19201 | 13 还真没注意过进cmos看硬盘的数据。
不过那个应该是确切的硬件显示,想象中应该是能看到整个的容量
【在 d***y 的大作中提到】 : 进CMOS看硬盘的一些参数可看出硬盘确切容量
| c*****a 发帖数: 8464 | 14 这个不是evil,不过是刷盘子的可怜同胞而已,解释下就好了 | d******i 发帖数: 1064 | | d*********r 发帖数: 11979 | 16 分特,偶就够盲的了,你更盲
【在 f****g 的大作中提到】 : 他上来就说Not-as-described. 要full refund 加return shipping.我正在查是咋回事 : 呢。 : 应该是安装的软件会占部分硬盘,但是差距不应该这么大。 : 各位高人,有没有合理的解释?
| f****g 发帖数: 4248 | 17 梦老,不准嘲笑我们化学WSN。
This is a very common question, and it is due to the use of different definitions of the prefixes kilo-, mega-, and giga -. The true meanings of these are thousands, millions, and billions. However, in binary arithmetic 1000 is not an integer power, but 1024 is. Because this is close to 1000, early computer scientists started calling it a kilo also, and it continues to this day.
So, we now have the two sets of definitions for these prefixes; decimal notation and binary notation. The number of bits in each is:
kilo = 1000 (decimal), 1024 (binary)
mega = 1000000 (decimal), 1048576 (binary)
giga = 1000000000 (decimal), 1073742824 (binary)
The disk manufacturer specifies the size in decimal notation, and says you have 160 (decimal) gigabytes, or 160 billion bytes. ''My Computer'' uses the binary notation and says you have 149 (binary) gigabytes, which is 149 times 1073742824, or 160 billion bytes.
Both the manufacturer and ''My Computer'' are reporting the same actual size, just in two different number systems.
【在 d*********r 的大作中提到】 : 分特,偶就够盲的了,你更盲
| h******x 发帖数: 10156 | 18
definitions of the prefixes kilo-, mega-, and giga -. The true meanings of
these are thousands, millions, and billions. However, in binary arithmetic
1000 is not an integer power, but 1024 is. Because this is close to 1000,
early computer scientists started calling it a kilo also, and it continues
to this day.
notation and binary notation. The number of bits in each is:
have 160 (decimal) gigabytes, or 160 billion bytes. ''My Computer'' uses
the binary notation and says you have 149 (binary) gigabytes, which is 149
times 1073742824, or 160 billion bytes.
size, just in two different number systems.
这是正解。
【在 f****g 的大作中提到】 : 梦老,不准嘲笑我们化学WSN。 : This is a very common question, and it is due to the use of different definitions of the prefixes kilo-, mega-, and giga -. The true meanings of these are thousands, millions, and billions. However, in binary arithmetic 1000 is not an integer power, but 1024 is. Because this is close to 1000, early computer scientists started calling it a kilo also, and it continues to this day. : So, we now have the two sets of definitions for these prefixes; decimal notation and binary notation. The number of bits in each is: : kilo = 1000 (decimal), 1024 (binary) : mega = 1000000 (decimal), 1048576 (binary) : giga = 1000000000 (decimal), 1073742824 (binary) : The disk manufacturer specifies the size in decimal notation, and says you have 160 (decimal) gigabytes, or 160 billion bytes. ''My Computer'' uses the binary notation and says you have 149 (binary) gigabytes, which is 149 times 1073742824, or 160 billion bytes. : Both the manufacturer and ''My Computer'' are reporting the same actual size, just in two different number systems.
| c*******1 发帖数: 2856 | | f*******l 发帖数: 1231 | | | | f*******l 发帖数: 1231 | | e******e 发帖数: 1098 | 22 业务素质
definitions of the prefixes kilo-, mega-, and giga -. The true meanings of
these are thousands, millions, and billions. However, in binary arithmetic
1000 is not an integer power, but 1024 is. Because this is close to 1000,
early computer scientists started calling it a kilo also, and it continues
to this day.
notation and binary notation. The number of bits in each is:
have 160 (decimal) gigabytes, or 160 billion bytes. ''My Computer'' uses
the binary notation and says you have 149 (binary) gigabytes, which is 149
times 1073742824, or 160 billion bytes.
size, just in two different number systems.
【在 f****g 的大作中提到】 : 梦老,不准嘲笑我们化学WSN。 : This is a very common question, and it is due to the use of different definitions of the prefixes kilo-, mega-, and giga -. The true meanings of these are thousands, millions, and billions. However, in binary arithmetic 1000 is not an integer power, but 1024 is. Because this is close to 1000, early computer scientists started calling it a kilo also, and it continues to this day. : So, we now have the two sets of definitions for these prefixes; decimal notation and binary notation. The number of bits in each is: : kilo = 1000 (decimal), 1024 (binary) : mega = 1000000 (decimal), 1048576 (binary) : giga = 1000000000 (decimal), 1073742824 (binary) : The disk manufacturer specifies the size in decimal notation, and says you have 160 (decimal) gigabytes, or 160 billion bytes. ''My Computer'' uses the binary notation and says you have 149 (binary) gigabytes, which is 149 times 1073742824, or 160 billion bytes. : Both the manufacturer and ''My Computer'' are reporting the same actual size, just in two different number systems.
| s***r 发帖数: 4013 | | L*3 发帖数: 3766 | 24 名义容量320G (1000进制)的话,实际的只有298G(1024进制),去掉recovery和os
的话285G可用是正常的 | f****g 发帖数: 4248 | 25 This is exactly my reply to him last night. Hopefully, he will buy this
story, otherwise, evil indeed.
os
【在 L*3 的大作中提到】 : 名义容量320G (1000进制)的话,实际的只有298G(1024进制),去掉recovery和os : 的话285G可用是正常的
| f****g 发帖数: 4248 | 26 Vestal, NY 13850-3765
(A Chinese guy in a local Attorney office)
【在 c*******1 的大作中提到】 : qiang li ?
| p*********w 发帖数: 23432 | 27 这个也差太多了吧
哦。
【在 f****g 的大作中提到】 : 买了个ACER laptop,今天给我说,硬盘是285G,不是320G.要退。还不出运费。我日哦。 : 原来看到那么多说同胞的,我还半信半疑。NY的。是在BBS上混的不?
|
|