j*********u
发帖数: 31 | 1 我用USPS的priority mail寄到中国一包裹，外包装完好（当时贴了fragile的标志），
但签收时未拆箱检查。后来拆开才发现，里面摔烂了！我邮寄时买了保险。
可是，我交了索赔表后被拒绝了。USPS坚持：必须中方邮局出报损单据，承认东西是邮
局运输中损坏的。签收人拿着摔坏的东西去国内邮局，他们据不认帐，声称签收时外包
装完好，不是他们的责任。
谁遇见过类似的事？难道就只能认倒霉了？能否去小额法庭告USPS？ | d*****a
发帖数: 1319 | 2 外包装完好
你自己的责任吧
何况签收了
【在 j*********u 的大作中提到】
: 我用USPS的priority mail寄到中国一包裹，外包装完好（当时贴了fragile的标志），
: 但签收时未拆箱检查。后来拆开才发现，里面摔烂了！我邮寄时买了保险。
: 可是，我交了索赔表后被拒绝了。USPS坚持：必须中方邮局出报损单据，承认东西是邮
: 局运输中损坏的。签收人拿着摔坏的东西去国内邮局，他们据不认帐，声称签收时外包
: 装完好，不是他们的责任。
: 谁遇见过类似的事？难道就只能认倒霉了？能否去小额法庭告USPS？
| j*******g
发帖数: 1561 | | t***u
发帖数: 20182 | | w*********p
发帖数: 7230 | 5 I hope this message finds you well, present circumstances excluded.
Unfortunately, you cannot sue the US Postal Service in small claims court.
The US Postal Service is a federal government entity, and as such, a state
or municipal court cannot assert jurisdiction over them.
You will have to file a suit against them in federal court. Before you can
sue a federal government entity in federal court you must notify them with
what is called a notice of claim.
Their defense is going to be that they are immune from suit in the present
case. In 28 USC § 2680(b), the government retains immunity for "Any claim
arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters
or postal matter."
I think the way that you argue against this rather generic statute is to
state that you had it insured. As a result, you are technically suing the
insuring mechanism of the Postal Service.
At any rate, I would recommend hiring an attorney to potentially file the
suit as federal claims and litigation is quite complicated. To that end, I
recognize the monetary issue hiring an attorney would pose. It will be
incumbent on you to do a cost to benefit analysis to see if it is worth it.
I wish I had better news for you, but I am obligated to tell you the legal
reality of the situation.
Best wishes going forward with this issue and I appreciate the opportunity
to assist you with it. | m*r
发帖数: 37612 | 6 我靠，对于我们这种illiterate的吊死来说，这写的也太专业了，完全看不懂
【在 w*********p 的大作中提到】
: I hope this message finds you well, present circumstances excluded.
: Unfortunately, you cannot sue the US Postal Service in small claims court.
: The US Postal Service is a federal government entity, and as such, a state
: or municipal court cannot assert jurisdiction over them.
: You will have to file a suit against them in federal court. Before you can
: sue a federal government entity in federal court you must notify them with
: what is called a notice of claim.
: Their defense is going to be that they are immune from suit in the present
: case. In 28 USC § 2680(b), the government retains immunity for "Any claim
: arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters
| P*A
发帖数: 7996 | 7 就是没戏的意思
【在 m*r 的大作中提到】
: 我靠，对于我们这种illiterate的吊死来说，这写的也太专业了，完全看不懂
| w*********p
发帖数: 7230 | 8 就是丢了白丢，小额法庭是state的管不了federal机构，
如果有保险可以去federal法庭告，不过不可以告usps丢信，因为他们immune，告的是
insurance，要请律师费时费力
【在 P*A 的大作中提到】
: 就是没戏的意思
| a******e
发帖数: 393 | 9 那大家看看我这种情况怎么办? 我寄了23lb的东西回国,到了国内还剩17lb, 正好是把
我的电脑拿出来了.我自己是用透明胶带打包的, 家人收到后显示用usps的胶带重新包
装过. 打了无数次电话,三个月过去了, 一直说调查中. | j*******g
发帖数: 1561 | 10 可能违反航空运输条例或者海关龟腚被拿出来了
【在 a******e 的大作中提到】
: 那大家看看我这种情况怎么办? 我寄了23lb的东西回国,到了国内还剩17lb, 正好是把
: 我的电脑拿出来了.我自己是用透明胶带打包的, 家人收到后显示用usps的胶带重新包
: 装过. 打了无数次电话,三个月过去了, 一直说调查中.
| a********1
发帖数: 80 | |
|
