B*******e
发帖数: 1009 | 1 Okay. We have no common-ground to talk about this.
The whole point of making FG reviewable is to eliminate the argument of all
these nonsence whether it is FG made or not.
But if you think the human judgemental call is more reliable than high tech,
think it is a "why bother", and enjoy all these after-game hatred argments,
there is no point of disscussion and a pure waste of all my previous typing. |
|
h**********e
发帖数: 4328 | 2 my point is that nfl does not want to introduce more techs (the ones you
mentioned above, sensor, camera sync whatsoever...)
with current implemented techs, it is very much unlikely to have a better
view of that fg we have been talking about. thus this type of calls are
unreviewable
all
tech,
argments,
typing. |
|
b**l
发帖数: 33123 | 3 Review is done by human. 像网球一样交给计算机模拟是个办法。
all
tech,
argments,
typing. |
|
h**********e
发帖数: 4328 | 4 而且如果不高于球门的fg本来就是reviewable的
all
tech,
argments,
typing. |
|
f*******5
发帖数: 10321 | 5 isnt it similar to argmented reality? |
|
