l**********1
发帖数: 5204 | 1 alternative ask:
自己的中了纺锭的标书大半一年后 开始觉得很难接近原标书目标正方向的PI 这里有
么?
那以后是曲线救标的 就是收集向斜方向或逆方向的数据呢 还是直线下潜始忽悠 利
用统计原理/Markov model 啥的 哈 ??
pls refer
the HHMI researchers also produced 35
percent more research papers that went largely uncited. (These papers were
abject failures, the Solyndra of peer-review.)
more pls go to
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/09/the-necessity-of-fund
The Necessity of Funding Failure
By JONAH LEHRER09.25.2011 10:30 PM
Top omitted
HHMI, in contrast, is known for supporti... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***u
发帖数: 82 | 2 I think as long as you can get good reference letters you should be able to
claim original research or breakthrough for those uncited papers.
My recent experience revealed that it is relatively difficulty to get
supporting letters for those not well cited paper. |
|
s*****g
发帖数: 5159 | 3 If your paper is as closely related as the others in the reference, then yes.
If this was the case, usually you would able to provide a few other uncited
references with the similar correlation.
Also think that quite some journal / conference has a page limit - one thing
to cut are those not so related references.
Explain with a joke, back to the 1960s, a man want send a telegram to his
wife. Telegram was charged by letter, and was expensive. He started with a
draft - a small paragraph. For mone... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*******t
发帖数: 33714 | 4 "there seems to be no information in the literature."
──作者
真想直接pia上去
yes.
uncited
thing |
|
w*********r
发帖数: 3382 | 5 yeah right
losing ground in developed countries and gaining recognition in a developing
country, that is a real sign of prosperity!
why don't you use africa as an example? they are getting both christianity
and AIDS!
plus those data is uncited and close to fairy tale.
and again, now you want to recruit people from "三自爱国教会" in your army
when you treated them like second class citizen since always? |
|
l***d
发帖数: 1828 | 6 http://www.nature.com/news/2010/101118/full/news.2010.620.html
Nobel prize committee under fire
Errors lead to accusations that committee did not do its homework before
making the 2010 award for physics.
A high-profile graphene researcher has written to the Nobel prize committee
for physics, objecting to errors in its explanation of this year's prize.
The award was given to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov of Manchester
University, UK, for their work on graphene, a two-dimensional carbon
stru... 阅读全帖 |
|
