由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - 最近有人投过PNAS featured article 或者PNAS plus吗?
相关主题
有人投过PNAS Plus吗?问一下PNAS投稿
谁有投过Nature communication的经验呢?PNAS plus和PNAS?
一个朋友热衷写review对高影响因子追求是目前科学界一个普遍问题呀
Will this year's impact factor come out soon?投过EMBO J 的朋友帮忙指点一下
Nature communication有多牛?有没有人投过Nature cell biology的short communication?
nature communications Impact Factor expected 2013, goal 12.00+谁投过nature protocols?
问一下elife这个杂志好么?投过immunity的进来看下
PNAS Plus?有没有投过Cell Death Differentiation的同志
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: pnas话题: plus话题: article话题: feature话题: pi
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
s********8
发帖数: 619
1
真郁闷,PNAS原来有6页的page limit.快要投了才发现文章太长了,关键是图多,有七个
图,而且都很大.
到底是换个journal还是试试featured article或者plus呢?这两个都可以有十页.但不
知道是不是很难中?还有plus是online only的,有人投过这个吗,感觉怪怪的.
H*g
发帖数: 2333
2
If I understand correctly, the submission policy to PNAS is that you could
only submit your manuscript to only one category, either report, or feature
article or Plus. And with every feature article, there would be one
commentary with it in the same issue. So, if you are not super confident
with the potential impacts of your manuscript, go directly to feature may
not be wise, since you couldn't go back to re-submit as a Plus.
PNAS Plus is still PNAS, just another way to publish on-line instead of in
print. The review process is all the same as the one for the 6-page report.
s********8
发帖数: 619
3
Thank you very much for your advice. Yes I understand that I have to chose
one of these as I submit.
I am not super confident about the feature article so I would like to try
the plus since I don't want to squeeze my paper into 6 pages.
My PI is just not very certain about the visibility of PNAS plus.
What do you think? Many thanks!

feature

【在 H*g 的大作中提到】
: If I understand correctly, the submission policy to PNAS is that you could
: only submit your manuscript to only one category, either report, or feature
: article or Plus. And with every feature article, there would be one
: commentary with it in the same issue. So, if you are not super confident
: with the potential impacts of your manuscript, go directly to feature may
: not be wise, since you couldn't go back to re-submit as a Plus.
: PNAS Plus is still PNAS, just another way to publish on-line instead of in
: print. The review process is all the same as the one for the 6-page report.

H*g
发帖数: 2333
4
I suspect your PI is not a junior researcher, but instead a senior, or an
even older senior researcher.
when was the last time you want to retrieve a certain article, you opened
Pubmed and began to search, then downloaded the pdf and printed it out?
Something sounds like happened today?
And when was the last time you have to go to the library and browse over the
shelves to retrieve one article? Something maybe have never happened for
our generation.
PNAS Plus is still PNAS, which could be accessed on-line as all other PNAS
paper. For the visibility issue, I don't think that is a problem at all.

【在 s********8 的大作中提到】
: Thank you very much for your advice. Yes I understand that I have to chose
: one of these as I submit.
: I am not super confident about the feature article so I would like to try
: the plus since I don't want to squeeze my paper into 6 pages.
: My PI is just not very certain about the visibility of PNAS plus.
: What do you think? Many thanks!
:
: feature

s********8
发帖数: 619
5
Thank you for the reassurance! Will go ahead to try PNAS. My PI is a senior
person indeed:)

the

【在 H*g 的大作中提到】
: I suspect your PI is not a junior researcher, but instead a senior, or an
: even older senior researcher.
: when was the last time you want to retrieve a certain article, you opened
: Pubmed and began to search, then downloaded the pdf and printed it out?
: Something sounds like happened today?
: And when was the last time you have to go to the library and browse over the
: shelves to retrieve one article? Something maybe have never happened for
: our generation.
: PNAS Plus is still PNAS, which could be accessed on-line as all other PNAS
: paper. For the visibility issue, I don't think that is a problem at all.

s********8
发帖数: 619
6
真郁闷,PNAS原来有6页的page limit.快要投了才发现文章太长了,关键是图多,有七个
图,而且都很大.
到底是换个journal还是试试featured article或者plus呢?这两个都可以有十页.但不
知道是不是很难中?还有plus是online only的,有人投过这个吗,感觉怪怪的.
H*g
发帖数: 2333
7
If I understand correctly, the submission policy to PNAS is that you could
only submit your manuscript to only one category, either report, or feature
article or Plus. And with every feature article, there would be one
commentary with it in the same issue. So, if you are not super confident
with the potential impacts of your manuscript, go directly to feature may
not be wise, since you couldn't go back to re-submit as a Plus.
PNAS Plus is still PNAS, just another way to publish on-line instead of in
print. The review process is all the same as the one for the 6-page report.
s********8
发帖数: 619
8
Thank you very much for your advice. Yes I understand that I have to chose
one of these as I submit.
I am not super confident about the feature article so I would like to try
the plus since I don't want to squeeze my paper into 6 pages.
My PI is just not very certain about the visibility of PNAS plus.
What do you think? Many thanks!

feature

【在 H*g 的大作中提到】
: If I understand correctly, the submission policy to PNAS is that you could
: only submit your manuscript to only one category, either report, or feature
: article or Plus. And with every feature article, there would be one
: commentary with it in the same issue. So, if you are not super confident
: with the potential impacts of your manuscript, go directly to feature may
: not be wise, since you couldn't go back to re-submit as a Plus.
: PNAS Plus is still PNAS, just another way to publish on-line instead of in
: print. The review process is all the same as the one for the 6-page report.

H*g
发帖数: 2333
9
I suspect your PI is not a junior researcher, but instead a senior, or an
even older senior researcher.
when was the last time you want to retrieve a certain article, you opened
Pubmed and began to search, then downloaded the pdf and printed it out?
Something sounds like happened today?
And when was the last time you have to go to the library and browse over the
shelves to retrieve one article? Something maybe have never happened for
our generation.
PNAS Plus is still PNAS, which could be accessed on-line as all other PNAS
paper. For the visibility issue, I don't think that is a problem at all.

【在 s********8 的大作中提到】
: Thank you very much for your advice. Yes I understand that I have to chose
: one of these as I submit.
: I am not super confident about the feature article so I would like to try
: the plus since I don't want to squeeze my paper into 6 pages.
: My PI is just not very certain about the visibility of PNAS plus.
: What do you think? Many thanks!
:
: feature

s********8
发帖数: 619
10
Thank you for the reassurance! Will go ahead to try PNAS. My PI is a senior
person indeed:)

the

【在 H*g 的大作中提到】
: I suspect your PI is not a junior researcher, but instead a senior, or an
: even older senior researcher.
: when was the last time you want to retrieve a certain article, you opened
: Pubmed and began to search, then downloaded the pdf and printed it out?
: Something sounds like happened today?
: And when was the last time you have to go to the library and browse over the
: shelves to retrieve one article? Something maybe have never happened for
: our generation.
: PNAS Plus is still PNAS, which could be accessed on-line as all other PNAS
: paper. For the visibility issue, I don't think that is a problem at all.

s*******h
发帖数: 23
11
这个貌似很慢。。。我同学有一回投了,等了3个月过去没音,结果后来还是被拒了
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
有没有投过Cell Death Differentiation的同志Nature communication有多牛?
有谁投过Nature Neurscience的Brief Communications?nature communications Impact Factor expected 2013, goal 12.00+
谁投过nature子刊的,问几个问题?问一下elife这个杂志好么?
有人投过nature communications么,turn around多久PNAS Plus?
有人投过PNAS Plus吗?问一下PNAS投稿
谁有投过Nature communication的经验呢?PNAS plus和PNAS?
一个朋友热衷写review对高影响因子追求是目前科学界一个普遍问题呀
Will this year's impact factor come out soon?投过EMBO J 的朋友帮忙指点一下
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: pnas话题: plus话题: article话题: feature话题: pi