S*****y
发帖数: 2871 | 1 主要是叫牌方面给初学者的，最好是Acol.
跑到bbo上去不会叫也不敢打呀
还是要拿本书来看看先
有人知道哪儿有桥牌书下载吗 |
m****r
发帖数: 6639 | 2 我不知道. 但是我顶你.
【在 S*****y 的大作中提到】
: 主要是叫牌方面给初学者的，最好是Acol.
: 跑到bbo上去不会叫也不敢打呀
: 还是要拿本书来看看先
: 有人知道哪儿有桥牌书下载吗
|
S*****y
发帖数: 2871 | 3 mapcar来下棋吧，kgs上。
bridge应该比Go更普及，但是为啥觉得bridge的资源更少呢？另外觉得不好上手，不会
叫牌基本就不能打啊。 |
m****r
发帖数: 6639 | 4 http://web2.acbl.org/documentlibrary/play/SP3%20%28bk%29%20sing
【在 S*****y 的大作中提到】
: mapcar来下棋吧，kgs上。
: bridge应该比Go更普及，但是为啥觉得bridge的资源更少呢？另外觉得不好上手，不会
: 叫牌基本就不能打啊。
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 5 The classic book is understanding ACOL by Crowhurst. It's quite an old book
though. I don't think a lot of players are still playing that style of ACOL.
Nowadays, a lot of UK players play an ACOL system which is quite close to
SAYC, except weak NT and one round forcing 2/1.
A better choice would be SAYC or some version of 2/1 if you are in US.
【在 S*****y 的大作中提到】
: 主要是叫牌方面给初学者的，最好是Acol.
: 跑到bbo上去不会叫也不敢打呀
: 还是要拿本书来看看先
: 有人知道哪儿有桥牌书下载吗
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 6 BBO上的体系主要是SAYC和2/1，我觉得既然是从头学，没必要从acol开始。
另外，看书固然需要，但也没必要因此就不敢上去打。毕竟，BBO上大部分人都只是乱
叫，我几乎从没碰到有整桌四个牌手都会叫牌的（我指的是随机组合，有固定搭档或是
事先约好的不算）。 |
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 7 www.13p.net
【在 S*****y 的大作中提到】
: 主要是叫牌方面给初学者的，最好是Acol.
: 跑到bbo上去不会叫也不敢打呀
: 还是要拿本书来看看先
: 有人知道哪儿有桥牌书下载吗
|
S*****y
发帖数: 2871 | |
S*****y
发帖数: 2871 | 9 谢谢推荐，回头去图书馆看看有没有。。。
book
ACOL.
【在 p***r 的大作中提到】
: The classic book is understanding ACOL by Crowhurst. It's quite an old book
: though. I don't think a lot of players are still playing that style of ACOL.
: Nowadays, a lot of UK players play an ACOL system which is quite close to
: SAYC, except weak NT and one round forcing 2/1.
: A better choice would be SAYC or some version of 2/1 if you are in US.
|
S*****y
发帖数: 2871 | 10 周围的朋友好像是打acol的。我以前打是最基础的自然叫，不过我们都是友谊牌，经常
叫不出来就问最牛的人应该怎么叫，所以到最后自己也不太会bid。
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: BBO上的体系主要是SAYC和2/1，我觉得既然是从头学，没必要从acol开始。
: 另外，看书固然需要，但也没必要因此就不敢上去打。毕竟，BBO上大部分人都只是乱
: 叫，我几乎从没碰到有整桌四个牌手都会叫牌的（我指的是随机组合，有固定搭档或是
: 事先约好的不算）。
|
|
|
S*****y
发帖数: 2871 | 11 赞！
【在 v**********e 的大作中提到】
: www.13p.net
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 12 SAYC就是最基础的自然叫。跟戈伦体系相比，主要区别一个是一阶高花开叫需要五张，
另一个是引进了弱二开叫。
【在 S*****y 的大作中提到】
: 周围的朋友好像是打acol的。我以前打是最基础的自然叫，不过我们都是友谊牌，经常
: 叫不出来就问最牛的人应该怎么叫，所以到最后自己也不太会bid。
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 13 Where are you right now? Britain?
Acol is a good system especially with modern developments. But SAYC looks
more easy to learn and control. That's why ACBL prefer it.
【在 S*****y 的大作中提到】
: 周围的朋友好像是打acol的。我以前打是最基础的自然叫，不过我们都是友谊牌，经常
: 叫不出来就问最牛的人应该怎么叫，所以到最后自己也不太会bid。
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 14 http://www.bridgeguys.com/pdf/AcolModernSystemFile06.pdf
Here's a version of Acol.
I'm not sure if Acol is good system for beginner, you can try if you want.
But You'd better find a regular partner to play Acol.
【在 S*****y 的大作中提到】
: 周围的朋友好像是打acol的。我以前打是最基础的自然叫，不过我们都是友谊牌，经常
: 叫不出来就问最牛的人应该怎么叫，所以到最后自己也不太会bid。
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 15 The basic design of acol in its 2/1 structure is very messy. It has too many
nonforcing bids and too few forcing bids, which makes it difficult in slam
bidding area.
The good part of acol for beginners is that it is indeed very very natural,
especially for the strong NT 4 card major one. Also, acol strong 2
convention is a very cozy convention for beginners.
Generally, the old acol system has very few agreements and only a bunch of
general rules, which is good for new bridge players and for pick up partners
.
【在 v**********e 的大作中提到】
: http://www.bridgeguys.com/pdf/AcolModernSystemFile06.pdf
: Here's a version of Acol.
: I'm not sure if Acol is good system for beginner, you can try if you want.
: But You'd better find a regular partner to play Acol.
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 16 Actually, there are top players using Acol frame system with more
sophisticated designs. Acol has its own advantages and features comparing
with 2/1. It's unfair to compare old acol with modern systems.
The thing I'm not sure is whether Acol system is good starting point for
beginner. However, I know many Polish guys starting from Polish Club which
is very artificial. That means the starting point may not be so important.
My suggestion is "Just try it!"
many
slam
,
partners
【在 p***r 的大作中提到】
: The basic design of acol in its 2/1 structure is very messy. It has too many
: nonforcing bids and too few forcing bids, which makes it difficult in slam
: bidding area.
: The good part of acol for beginners is that it is indeed very very natural,
: especially for the strong NT 4 card major one. Also, acol strong 2
: convention is a very cozy convention for beginners.
: Generally, the old acol system has very few agreements and only a bunch of
: general rules, which is good for new bridge players and for pick up partners
: .
|
B*****k
发帖数: 90 | 17 google了吗
【在 S*****y 的大作中提到】
: 主要是叫牌方面给初学者的，最好是Acol.
: 跑到bbo上去不会叫也不敢打呀
: 还是要拿本书来看看先
: 有人知道哪儿有桥牌书下载吗
|
F****H
发帖数: 202 | 18 我是2年前从对桥牌一无所知开始学起的，我觉得最好的入门教材是ACBL官网上面的两
套免费学习软件Learn to play bridge和Learn to play bridge 2，这2套互动软件非
常适合对桥牌甚至对扑克牌都一无所知的完全新手。另外还有一套做庄练习软件Bridge
Master 2000特别好，网上能找到破解版。最后再读一本书"桥牌防御战大全"，是关于
防守非常好的书。 |
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 19 Excellent suggestions!
Bridge
【在 F****H 的大作中提到】
: 我是2年前从对桥牌一无所知开始学起的，我觉得最好的入门教材是ACBL官网上面的两
: 套免费学习软件Learn to play bridge和Learn to play bridge 2，这2套互动软件非
: 常适合对桥牌甚至对扑克牌都一无所知的完全新手。另外还有一套做庄练习软件Bridge
: Master 2000特别好，网上能找到破解版。最后再读一本书"桥牌防御战大全"，是关于
: 防守非常好的书。
|
