由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Business版 - 问个CFA I的题目
相关主题
CFA Level I --- ROA/ROE 困 惑CS PhD VS. CS Master + Finance Master
各位CFA II的同学,问一个关于FCFF,FCFE的问题。Question about retained earnings
CFA考友看过来,capital lease的问题搞明白了吗?投资学教材急问
CFA 适合我嘛请教FCFF和EV(enterprise value)之间的关系
问个CFA的问题问一个关于LBO的概念性问题
问个弱智问题哪里可以找到capitalized R&D
问个 CFA相关的问题Top MBA career choices
急问怎么估算一个公司的价值?expensed 和 capitalized 的区别是什么?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: cost话题: debt话题: wacc话题: new话题: capital
进入Business版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
m******m
发帖数: 445
1
company A: 50% equity at average cost of 10% and 50% debt at average
after-tax cost of 3%, 40% effective tax rate
company B: all equity with average cost of 7%, tax rate 40%
both companies issue debt at par with coupon rate 7%, what will be the
effect on each company's marginal cost of capital?
A B
A) higher higher
B) H lower
C) L H
D) L L
我选D,答案B。
thanks.
m********9
发帖数: 116
2
B company's WACC will decrease for sure,
For A, when you calculate WACC, the after tax cost of debt is originally 3%,
and change to 4.2% now....so cost of debt increase, thus overall WACC incre
ase.
you can not judge buy saying that the new debt cost is lower than the origin
al WACC and WACC should be lower, actually the factor of cost of debt increa
se, so overall WACC should be higher after the par coupon debt issuance.

【在 m******m 的大作中提到】
: company A: 50% equity at average cost of 10% and 50% debt at average
: after-tax cost of 3%, 40% effective tax rate
: company B: all equity with average cost of 7%, tax rate 40%
: both companies issue debt at par with coupon rate 7%, what will be the
: effect on each company's marginal cost of capital?
: A B
: A) higher higher
: B) H lower
: C) L H
: D) L L

m******m
发帖数: 445
3
Thanks but I still don't quite get it. Why the overall new WACC for A
company increases after the debt issuance? I understand that the new cost of
debt increases but no matter how I calculate it, I still get a lower new
WACC. Please share your calculation.

%,
incre
origin
increa

【在 m********9 的大作中提到】
: B company's WACC will decrease for sure,
: For A, when you calculate WACC, the after tax cost of debt is originally 3%,
: and change to 4.2% now....so cost of debt increase, thus overall WACC incre
: ase.
: you can not judge buy saying that the new debt cost is lower than the origin
: al WACC and WACC should be lower, actually the factor of cost of debt increa
: se, so overall WACC should be higher after the par coupon debt issuance.

m********9
发帖数: 116
4
the new WACC = 50%*10% +50%*7%*(1-40%) = 7.1%

of

【在 m******m 的大作中提到】
: Thanks but I still don't quite get it. Why the overall new WACC for A
: company increases after the debt issuance? I understand that the new cost of
: debt increases but no matter how I calculate it, I still get a lower new
: WACC. Please share your calculation.
:
: %,
: incre
: origin
: increa

m******m
发帖数: 445
5
I guess using new 7% as debt cost directly in this problem is not
appropriate
assume orginial capital is C (C/2 is debt, C/2 is equity)
new debt is a
old WACC=50%*10%+50%*3%=6.5%
new WACC=0.5C/(C+a)*3%+a/(C+a)*7%*(1-40%)+0.5C/(C+a)*10% < 6.5%
The question is so confusing.

【在 m********9 的大作中提到】
: the new WACC = 50%*10% +50%*7%*(1-40%) = 7.1%
:
: of

m********9
发帖数: 116
6
还是你算得对,我也不明白为什么答案是higher

I guess using new 7% as debt cost directly in this problem is not
appropriate
assume orginial capital is C (C/2 is debt, C/2 is equity)
new debt is a
old WACC=50%*10%+50%*3%=6.5%
new WACC=0.5C/(C+a)*3%+a/(C+a)*7%*(1-40%)+0.5C/(C+a)*10% < 6.5%
The question is so confusing.

【在 m******m 的大作中提到】
: I guess using new 7% as debt cost directly in this problem is not
: appropriate
: assume orginial capital is C (C/2 is debt, C/2 is equity)
: new debt is a
: old WACC=50%*10%+50%*3%=6.5%
: new WACC=0.5C/(C+a)*3%+a/(C+a)*7%*(1-40%)+0.5C/(C+a)*10% < 6.5%
: The question is so confusing.

m********9
发帖数: 116
7
明白了,新issue的debt,所有的debt都按照新的debt cost来算。。。。
加油!!

【在 m******m 的大作中提到】
: I guess using new 7% as debt cost directly in this problem is not
: appropriate
: assume orginial capital is C (C/2 is debt, C/2 is equity)
: new debt is a
: old WACC=50%*10%+50%*3%=6.5%
: new WACC=0.5C/(C+a)*3%+a/(C+a)*7%*(1-40%)+0.5C/(C+a)*10% < 6.5%
: The question is so confusing.

v*****r
发帖数: 2325
8
at first try, i chose the same answer as you did. assumed "weighted average
of cost of capital", choose D
however, this question asks about "marginal cost"
marginal cost will always going higher because of the upsloping supply curve
of capital.... probably the amount of capital both companies raised is less
than face value. this means that the debt is kind of discount bonds
this is really a very confusing and tricky quesition... most of the
description of the qestion leads us to think aboiut wei

【在 m******m 的大作中提到】
: company A: 50% equity at average cost of 10% and 50% debt at average
: after-tax cost of 3%, 40% effective tax rate
: company B: all equity with average cost of 7%, tax rate 40%
: both companies issue debt at par with coupon rate 7%, what will be the
: effect on each company's marginal cost of capital?
: A B
: A) higher higher
: B) H lower
: C) L H
: D) L L

m******m
发帖数: 445
9
then how do you explain B company?
previous debt cost=0, after debt cost>0
marginal cost also higher with the same rule you used.

average
curve
less
cost

【在 v*****r 的大作中提到】
: at first try, i chose the same answer as you did. assumed "weighted average
: of cost of capital", choose D
: however, this question asks about "marginal cost"
: marginal cost will always going higher because of the upsloping supply curve
: of capital.... probably the amount of capital both companies raised is less
: than face value. this means that the debt is kind of discount bonds
: this is really a very confusing and tricky quesition... most of the
: description of the qestion leads us to think aboiut wei

v*****r
发帖数: 2325
10
both company assume more credit risk by issuing the new debt
so marginal cost for both companies going higher

【在 m******m 的大作中提到】
: then how do you explain B company?
: previous debt cost=0, after debt cost>0
: marginal cost also higher with the same rule you used.
:
: average
: curve
: less
: cost

相关主题
问个弱智问题CS PhD VS. CS Master + Finance Master
问个 CFA相关的问题Question about retained earnings
急问怎么估算一个公司的价值?投资学教材急问
进入Business版参与讨论
m******m
发帖数: 445
11
then your answer is A, not B

【在 v*****r 的大作中提到】
: both company assume more credit risk by issuing the new debt
: so marginal cost for both companies going higher

v*****r
发帖数: 2325
12
read the question description again, the new debt issued "at par".
for company B --- before the new debt, cost of capital = 7%, after tax cost
of new debt is 7%*(1-0.4) = 4.2%, so marginal cost of company B is lower
for company A --- before new debt, cost of capital = 0.5 * 0.1 + 0.5* 0.03
= 0.065
the new debt cost is 7% > 0.065, so marginal cost of capital is higher
so A Higher, B Lower
chose B

【在 m******m 的大作中提到】
: company A: 50% equity at average cost of 10% and 50% debt at average
: after-tax cost of 3%, 40% effective tax rate
: company B: all equity with average cost of 7%, tax rate 40%
: both companies issue debt at par with coupon rate 7%, what will be the
: effect on each company's marginal cost of capital?
: A B
: A) higher higher
: B) H lower
: C) L H
: D) L L

v*****r
发帖数: 2325
13
you are right, i confused myself. forget about capital supply curve. that's
for macro economic analysis, not for a specific study....
this question just test weighted average of cost of capital and marginal
cost ( compare cost of new capital with existing cost of capital)...

【在 m******m 的大作中提到】
: then your answer is A, not B
y***t
发帖数: 644
14
"for company A --- before new debt, cost of capital = 0.5 * 0.1 + 0.5* 0.03
= 0.065
the new debt cost is 7% > 0.065, so marginal cost of capital is higher"
Here new debt cost does not need to multiply 1 - tax rate?
m******m
发帖数: 445
15
co-ask

03

【在 y***t 的大作中提到】
: "for company A --- before new debt, cost of capital = 0.5 * 0.1 + 0.5* 0.03
: = 0.065
: the new debt cost is 7% > 0.065, so marginal cost of capital is higher"
: Here new debt cost does not need to multiply 1 - tax rate?

v*****r
发帖数: 2325
16
sorry my mistake... both should be lower
read the question description again, the new debt issued "at par".
for company B --- before the new debt, cost of capital = 7%, after tax cost
of new debt is 7%*(1-0.4) = 4.2%, so effect on marginal cost of company B is
lower
for company A --- before new debt, cost of capital = 0.5 * 0.1 + 0.5* 0.03
= 0.065
after tax cost of the new debt cost is 7%*(1-0.4) = 4.2% > 3%
so the new debt going to make average after tax cost of debt higher
how ever, the weight

【在 m******m 的大作中提到】
: company A: 50% equity at average cost of 10% and 50% debt at average
: after-tax cost of 3%, 40% effective tax rate
: company B: all equity with average cost of 7%, tax rate 40%
: both companies issue debt at par with coupon rate 7%, what will be the
: effect on each company's marginal cost of capital?
: A B
: A) higher higher
: B) H lower
: C) L H
: D) L L

1 (共1页)
进入Business版参与讨论
相关主题
expensed 和 capitalized 的区别是什么?问个CFA的问题
mean/ std问个弱智问题
corporate finance研究方向求教问个 CFA相关的问题
LTCM和俄罗斯外汇储备急问怎么估算一个公司的价值?
CFA Level I --- ROA/ROE 困 惑CS PhD VS. CS Master + Finance Master
各位CFA II的同学,问一个关于FCFF,FCFE的问题。Question about retained earnings
CFA考友看过来,capital lease的问题搞明白了吗?投资学教材急问
CFA 适合我嘛请教FCFF和EV(enterprise value)之间的关系
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: cost话题: debt话题: wacc话题: new话题: capital