由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
CivilEngineering版 - [合集] urgent help about FE, CPEES evaluation (cont'd)
相关主题
urgent help about FE, CPEES evaluation (cont'd)[合集] 申请土木工程版(civil engineering)版副
[合集] 有人愿意联名给NCEES写信,抵制CPEES吗?[合集] 请问建筑材料研究属于civil engineering吗?
FE 报名被据前辈给说说PE,FE的事情吧,尤其是最近考试报名的。
urgent help about FE, CPEES evaluation**** PE Exam Qualification (Post your experience here!)*****
my cpees evaluation report[合集] 前辈给说说PE,FE的事情吧,尤其是最近考试报名的。
FE/PE 本科学位评估[合集] 昨天的PE(Civil/Struct Depth)考试小结
[合集] urgent help about FE, CPEES evaluationIL是我见到的最BT的州
关于本科学位认证关于CPEES 评估外国本科学历的几个问题,谢谢啦。
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: nov话题: cpees话题: 2007话题: 提到话题: degree
进入CivilEngineering版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
k****n
发帖数: 3803
1
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
nuprco (nuprco) 于 (Wed Nov 7 19:26:59 2007) 提到:
Today I sent the 30 day demand letter to CPEES. At the same time I reported
this thing to NCEES and the state board. If I don't get any reponse from
CPEES in 30 days, I would file suit in a court.
During this period, I am trying to collect more evidence.
Two points,
1, Since they already accepted the Transcripts Request Form and Course
Description with departmental stamp (not university), why do they refuse to
answer if they accept such documents of mine. Despising me?
2, "Sending original degree verification to CPEES" is a despising policy for
all the international students. Original degree verification is not the
only way to verify someone's degree. Especially in the case that the loss of
a original degree verification is not redeemable, such requirement is
reasonless.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
uniwander (是的,你们都要结束的) 于 (Wed Nov 7 20:04:28 2007) 提到:
If you really want to collect evidences from others, you'd better first tell
us your background

reported
to
for
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
ZQBX (自戕不惜) 于 (Thu Nov 8 03:08:12 2007) 提到:
到底谁不reasonable?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
tsrif (tsrif) 于 (Thu Nov 8 09:02:40 2007) 提到:
还是支持你告。不过还是要说,证据还是不充分。
1.他们不想有任何官方的承诺。这不是违法。
2.美国的学位证可以从学校order copy,他们不明白国内的只有一个原件。这也不是违
法和歧视。
支持你告,但是要准备充分些,就算不能赢官司,也要赢得变革。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
tsrif (tsrif) 于 (Fri Nov 9 09:00:11 2007) 提到:
最后一段没看懂,概率怎么算的。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
tedamiao (benben) 于 (Fri Nov 9 10:43:18 2007) 提到:
Remember, that is their goal to make 95% "Not Pass". It is NCEES and state
board asked them to do so.
This favorate most State Board officals and engineers because they have USA
Abet degrees.
reported
to
for
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
ZQBX (自戕不惜) 于 (Fri Nov 9 11:41:49 2007) 提到:
Their rationale is:
The total amount of time is the same for undergraduate education anywhere in
the world. so if you gain 180 credits in China while a US person gains 120
credits for a BS degree, your 1 credit is equivalent to 120/180 = 0.67 of US
credit.
nuprco?
required
16
categorized
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
ceecheck (cee) 于 (Fri Nov 9 13:37:18 2007) 提到:
This is rediculous.
We should fight together for this fucking policy.
One simple case is if some guys in a very low level college outside of U.S.
got a bachelor degree with a very low amount of credit, let's say 90. Does
it mean each of his credit is worth 2 times of Americans'? If someone is
very diligent in studying and choose as many as possible courses to get a
bachelor degree. Does it mean his credit depreciate?
I support a lawsuit for those evaluation agencies.
in
120
US
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
shangzh (xiao) 于 (Tue Dec 4 09:21:34 2007) 提到:
hi, how is your lawsuit going?
wanna more evidence? the problem I have is that they asked all the documents
should be directly send by university! it is ridiculous!
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whype (Be Happy) 于 (Wed Dec 12 11:36:58 2007) 提到:
According the latest CPEES newsletter, "One interesting fact is that only 21
percent of the evaluations released have been judged ABETequivalent". It is
CRAZY.
Also, looks like "certain approved programs in India would become recognized
" in the near future by CPEES.
http://www.cpees.org/bulletin_1107.pdf
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
tedamiao (benben) 于 (Thu Dec 13 10:43:50 2007) 提到:
That is already a big step. At the beginning, it is only 5% passing.
21
is
recognized
1 (共1页)
进入CivilEngineering版参与讨论
相关主题
关于CPEES 评估外国本科学历的几个问题,谢谢啦。my cpees evaluation report
现在怎么都用这个 CPEES 来评估了?FE/PE 本科学位评估
请问一下关于FE考试的问题[合集] urgent help about FE, CPEES evaluation
关于PE的问题,谢谢大家回复关于本科学位认证
urgent help about FE, CPEES evaluation (cont'd)[合集] 申请土木工程版(civil engineering)版副
[合集] 有人愿意联名给NCEES写信,抵制CPEES吗?[合集] 请问建筑材料研究属于civil engineering吗?
FE 报名被据前辈给说说PE,FE的事情吧,尤其是最近考试报名的。
urgent help about FE, CPEES evaluation**** PE Exam Qualification (Post your experience here!)*****
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: nov话题: cpees话题: 2007话题: 提到话题: degree