M*****r
发帖数: 1536 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 LosAngeles 讨论区 】
发信人: Modeler ((Balance)), 信区: LosAngeles
标 题: Oracle to buy SUN?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Apr 20 09:51:41 2009)
http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/20/technology/Oracle_Sun/index.htm?postversion=2009042008
Oracle to buy Sun for $9.50 a share
Business software maker says it will acquire server maker's stock for $7.4
billion.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Business software maker Oracle Corp. said Monday
it has entered into a definitive agreement to buy server builder Sun
Microsystems |
B*****g
发帖数: 34098 | 2 so mysql dead?
Monday
【在 M*****r 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 LosAngeles 讨论区 】
: 发信人: Modeler ((Balance)), 信区: LosAngeles
: 标 题: Oracle to buy SUN?
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Apr 20 09:51:41 2009)
: http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/20/technology/Oracle_Sun/index.htm?postversion=2009042008
: Oracle to buy Sun for $9.50 a share
: Business software maker says it will acquire server maker's stock for $7.4
: billion.
: NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Business software maker Oracle Corp. said Monday
: it has entered into a definitive agreement to buy server builder Sun
|
M*****r
发帖数: 1536 | 3 不至于，反正是开源的，而且有好几个独立于SUN的小组也在开发，实在不行，拉上一
支队伍搞个branch就行了。
不过最近MySQL有够乱，前景确实存在不少疑问。
【在 B*****g 的大作中提到】
: so mysql dead?
:
: Monday
|
M*****r
发帖数: 1536 | 4 http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/20/markets/thebuzz/
"But software remains a tiny fraction of the business -- despite the company
's changing of its ticker symbol from SUNW to JAVA in 2007 to tout its
software prowess.
When the company reported its fiscal second-quarter results in January, Sun
said that "total software" sales rose 21% from a year ago, which is
impressive. But the annual run rate for the division was just $600 million.
To put that in perspective, analysts expect Sun to report total s
【在 M*****r 的大作中提到】
: 不至于，反正是开源的，而且有好几个独立于SUN的小组也在开发，实在不行，拉上一
: 支队伍搞个branch就行了。
: 不过最近MySQL有够乱，前景确实存在不少疑问。
|
j***a
发帖数: 10844 | |
j***a
发帖数: 10844 | 6 Oracle现在不是旗舰吗？
company
Sun
.
12
in
company
【在 M*****r 的大作中提到】
: http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/20/markets/thebuzz/
: "But software remains a tiny fraction of the business -- despite the company
: 's changing of its ticker symbol from SUNW to JAVA in 2007 to tout its
: software prowess.
: When the company reported its fiscal second-quarter results in January, Sun
: said that "total software" sales rose 21% from a year ago, which is
: impressive. But the annual run rate for the division was just $600 million.
: To put that in perspective, analysts expect Sun to report total s
|
B*****g
发帖数: 34098 | 7 顶 oracle
【在 j***a 的大作中提到】
: Oracle现在不是旗舰吗？
:
: company
: Sun
: .
: 12
: in
: company
|
q**u
发帖数: 12289 | 8 没几天蹦头了
【在 B*****g 的大作中提到】
: so mysql dead?
:
: Monday
|
k***e
发帖数: 7933 | 9 不知道前景如何，我们这里刚刚要用mysql代替ms sql server
【在 M*****r 的大作中提到】
: 不至于，反正是开源的，而且有好几个独立于SUN的小组也在开发，实在不行，拉上一
: 支队伍搞个branch就行了。
: 不过最近MySQL有够乱，前景确实存在不少疑问。
|
a******8
发帖数: 46 | |
|
|
M*****r
发帖数: 1536 | 11 为什么不用PostgreSQL?
我一直比较疑惑，为什么PostgreSQL一直火不起来？
技术上应当迄今为止还是比MySQL强/全
虽说大家都说MySQL快，可是也有不少人测试说PostgreSQL一点儿不慢,基本是case-by-
case的
http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/MySQL_vs_PostgreSQL
【在 k***e 的大作中提到】
: 不知道前景如何，我们这里刚刚要用mysql代替ms sql server
|
c*****t
发帖数: 1879 | 12 marketing...
by-
【在 M*****r 的大作中提到】
: 为什么不用PostgreSQL?
: 我一直比较疑惑，为什么PostgreSQL一直火不起来？
: 技术上应当迄今为止还是比MySQL强/全
: 虽说大家都说MySQL快，可是也有不少人测试说PostgreSQL一点儿不慢,基本是case-by-
: case的
: http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/MySQL_vs_PostgreSQL
|
B*****g
发帖数: 34098 | 13 nod
【在 c*****t 的大作中提到】
: marketing...
:
: by-
|
I******e
发帖数: 101 | 14 The key is InnoDB. It is a multi-versioned transaction engine. In
performance and reliability for < 4 core
machines, it is almost the same Oracle's transaction system.
PostgresSQL is only adding multi-versioning very recently and is still not
in good shape.
by-
【在 M*****r 的大作中提到】
: 为什么不用PostgreSQL?
: 我一直比较疑惑，为什么PostgreSQL一直火不起来？
: 技术上应当迄今为止还是比MySQL强/全
: 虽说大家都说MySQL快，可是也有不少人测试说PostgreSQL一点儿不慢,基本是case-by-
: case的
: http://www.wikivs.com/wiki/MySQL_vs_PostgreSQL
|
c*****t
发帖数: 1879 | 15 印象中 PostgreSQL 早就有了 MVCC 啊。MySQL 开始的时候连 transaction
都没有，后来才加上这个的。但是同时也丢掉了 MySQL 以前的 "performance" 。
【在 I******e 的大作中提到】
: The key is InnoDB. It is a multi-versioned transaction engine. In
: performance and reliability for < 4 core
: machines, it is almost the same Oracle's transaction system.
: PostgresSQL is only adding multi-versioning very recently and is still not
: in good shape.
:
: by-
|
M*****r
发帖数: 1536 | 16 我也记得PostgreSQL 一直有MVCC for ACID的
另外，MySQL本质上只是个中间件，后面可以plugin各种database engine,它的ACID的
实现也依赖于后面的database engine.当年起家是靠MyISAM，没有transaction的。
InnoDB is owned by Oracle since 2005
http://www.innodb.com/company/
【在 c*****t 的大作中提到】
: 印象中 PostgreSQL 早就有了 MVCC 啊。MySQL 开始的时候连 transaction
: 都没有，后来才加上这个的。但是同时也丢掉了 MySQL 以前的 "performance" 。
|
I******e
发帖数: 101 | 17 Good answer :)
Why did Oracle spend 10M on InnoDB in 2005? Why did Mysql try to bid with
Oracle and failed later? Why Mysql started falcon and is going nowhere?
I can list top world sites running InnoDB: Google, Wikipedia, Ticketmaster,
almost all startups(facebook, linkin) ...
I once talked with Postgres people and remember their replication under MVCC
totally does not work in 2007. Maybe it is just one version of Postgres :) |
