l******4
发帖数: 1105 | |
F********r
发帖数: 1748 | |
a*********g
发帖数: 228 | 3 如果J婊和140EAD一起出了也就认了，只出J婊，那真是日了 |
F********r
发帖数: 1748 | 4 那个140EAD真心没用。必须compelling situatuon,还要放弃当前合法身份不能交485..
. 这玩意你敢用？
【在 a*********g 的大作中提到】
: 如果J婊和140EAD一起出了也就认了，只出J婊，那真是日了
|
l******4
发帖数: 1105 | 5 今年名额都用光了。怎么什么倒霉事都让我碰上了。还连着两年。是不是该买彩票 |
S****h
发帖数: 558 | 6 我糊涂了。那这个不算数吗？我TMD的manager promotion被block了两次了。
【在 F********r 的大作中提到】
: 肯定没有。你这个是memoranda。
: 不过，J表马上会来的。
|
L*******d
发帖数: 2760 | 7 那个I140 EAD 不是要求很严格么？
J表暂时还看不出有什么好处。
140批了180天之后，原有雇主不可以取消140，但是新的雇主还需要重新走一遍perm吗
？如果不用的话，还是给很多人省下了不少麻烦的。
【在 a*********g 的大作中提到】
: 如果J婊和140EAD一起出了也就认了，只出J婊，那真是日了
|
F********r
发帖数: 1748 | 8 要重新走perm 和140
尼玛咋还有这么多人不知道呢。从去年年底就开始科普了。。。
【在 L*******d 的大作中提到】
: 那个I140 EAD 不是要求很严格么？
: J表暂时还看不出有什么好处。
: 140批了180天之后，原有雇主不可以取消140，但是新的雇主还需要重新走一遍perm吗
: ？如果不用的话，还是给很多人省下了不少麻烦的。
|
L*******d
发帖数: 2760 | 9 那完全没看出来有什么好处啊。
140 EAD条件那么苛刻，即使拿到了， 换了雇主也得重新走Perm. 和以前有区别么？
【在 F********r 的大作中提到】
: 要重新走perm 和140
: 尼玛咋还有这么多人不知道呢。从去年年底就开始科普了。。。
|
c*********4
发帖数: 45 | 10 区别就是过了180天安全期你就可以用一辈子H1B了
【在 L*******d 的大作中提到】
: 那完全没看出来有什么好处啊。
: 140 EAD条件那么苛刻，即使拿到了， 换了雇主也得重新走Perm. 和以前有区别么？
|
|
|
S****h
发帖数: 558 | 11 Do you refer to 214(j) or 140EAD?
This career progression item for manager promotion is quite useful (at least
for me). I was recommended for promotion to manager (from developer) twice
and shot down by immigration lawyer twice.
I don't need to worry about the downgrade to EB3 if that is true.
----------------------------------------------------------
Career Progression
USCIS recognizes that individuals earn opportunities for career advancement
as they gain experience over time. Cases involving career progression must
be considered under the totality of the circumstances to determine whether
the applicant has established by a preponderance of the evidence that the
relevant positions are in similar occupational classifications for 204(j)
portability purposes.
In many instances, an individual’s progress in his or her career may easily
fit the standards discussed in the preceding section, such as when an
individual moves into a more senior but related position that does not have
a managerial or supervisory role (e.g., a promotion from a software engineer
to a senior software engineer). In such cases, ISOs should consider whether
the original position and the new position are in the same or similar
occupational classification(s) consistent with the preceding section.
In other instances, career progression may involve a different analysis,
such as when an individual moves from a non-managerial and non-supervisory
position into a managerial or supervisory role. In these cases, if evidence
provided by applicants establishes that, in their new positions, they are
primarily responsible for managing the same or similar functions of their
original jobs or the work of individuals whose jobs are in the same or
similar occupational classification(s) as the applicants’ original
positions, ISOs may treat such evidence favorably in determining whether the
two jobs are in similar occupational classifications for purposes of 204(j)
portability. The following examples are illustrative:
Scenario A. If the occupation described in the original job offer was
assigned the SOC code of 15-1132 for Software Developers, Applications, ISOs
may determine that a new job offer described in the SOC code of 11-3021 for
Computer and Information Systems Managers is in a similar occupational
classification. This is because Computer and Information Systems Managers
generally manage individuals in positions that fall within occupational
classifications that are the same as or similar to the occupational
classification of the original job offer (e.g., Computer Programmers (15-
1131); Software Developers, Applications (15-1132); Software Developers,
Systems Software (15-1133); and Web Developers (15-1134), all of which are
grouped together under the broad occupational code for Software Developers
and Programmers (15-1130)).
【在 F********r 的大作中提到】
: 要重新走perm 和140
: 尼玛咋还有这么多人不知道呢。从去年年底就开始科普了。。。
|
L*******d
发帖数: 2760 | 12 。。。。
感觉这一招好狠啊，用一个过期的I140，然后无限期延长H1b。感觉完全是为了减少移
民的数量而设计出来的。希望后面不会有公司因为这个政策而不给办绿卡。
重新走Perm,看不到什么好处。
【在 c*********4 的大作中提到】
: 区别就是过了180天安全期你就可以用一辈子H1B了
|
r****u
发帖数: 618 | 13 本来就没什么好处。区别就是交了485跳槽以后更折腾你
【在 L*******d 的大作中提到】
: 那完全没看出来有什么好处啊。
: 140 EAD条件那么苛刻，即使拿到了， 换了雇主也得重新走Perm. 和以前有区别么？
|
F********r
发帖数: 1748 | 14 关于可以career progression的memo已经正式生效。你完全可以升职。这个memo里是没
有J表的。
J表在合法移民改革的大包裹里，现在在final rule making。
least
twice
advancement
【在 S****h 的大作中提到】
: Do you refer to 214(j) or 140EAD?
: This career progression item for manager promotion is quite useful (at least
: for me). I was recommended for promotion to manager (from developer) twice
: and shot down by immigration lawyer twice.
: I don't need to worry about the downgrade to EB3 if that is true.
:
: ----------------------------------------------------------
: Career Progression
: USCIS recognizes that individuals earn opportunities for career advancement
: as they gain experience over time. Cases involving career progression must
|
c*********4
发帖数: 45 | 15 跳槽后以后的公司确实可以以这个理由不给你办了
如果公司都这么干，短期来看占工作岗位的人数并不会减少，不过一旦失业就可以走人
了，长期来看绿卡数量是会减少的
我觉得吧，各种移民改革真的不是为了给移民好处的，只是变着法子折腾罢了，不要期
望太高的好
【在 L*******d 的大作中提到】
: 。。。。
: 感觉这一招好狠啊，用一个过期的I140，然后无限期延长H1b。感觉完全是为了减少移
: 民的数量而设计出来的。希望后面不会有公司因为这个政策而不给办绿卡。
: 重新走Perm,看不到什么好处。
|
