d********n
发帖数: 132 | 1 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
希望大侠帮忙，感激中
Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
Review: 8 times for 4 journals
Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
IO(TS): 1113
RFE:
核心是 2 authorship，3 judge 是satisfied,但是1 不满足，需要补充材料。
下面是详细内容：
*
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific,s cholarly, articistic
, athletic, or business-related contributiosn of major significance in the
field.
The petitioner has provided:
------ Testimonial letters
------Published journal articles
This criterion has not been met becuase the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. The published journal articles
establish that the petitioner has made original contributions to the field.
However, she has not established that her original contributions are of
major significance. The petitioner has submitted evidence that she
constructed a mathematical model for describing certain phenomena, although
one of her reference letter describe this "may provide new insight into
this phenomena". Initial promising results are not evidence of contributions
that are already recognized as having a major significance in the field.
Further the record fails to establish that other researchers began using her
model rather than the traditional models. She also submitted evidence that
she constructed a large database and indicated that it is accurate and
informative for describing the related phenomena. Another referred professor
writes that the database will have a profound importance in the study of
the related phenomena. However, the record lacks evidence of other
scientists or institutions which have began to use her database. To assist
in determining whether her contributions are original and OF MAJOR
significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
(1) Objective documentary evidence of the significance of her contribution
to the field;
(2) Documentary evidence that people throught the fild currently consider
the beneficiary's work important.
(3) Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficairy's contributions of major significance;
(4) Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contributions has
provoked widespead publich commentary in the field or has been widely cited;
and
(5) Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to
(5-1) Contracts with companies using the beneficairy's products;
(5-2) Licensed technology being used by others;
(5-3) Patents currently being utilized an shown to be significant to the
field.
Note: letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about hte beneficairy's contribution and must explain, in details,
how the contribution was original (not merely replicating the work of others
) and how the contributions were of "major " significance. General
statements regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported
by documentary evidence are insufficient.
Additionally, meeting the minimum regulatory criteria outlined above, along
will not establish eligibility for the E11 immigrant classification. Any
evidence submitted in response to this request, should also articulate how
the evidence establishes that the beneficiary possesses the required high
level of expertise for the E11 immigrant classification.
(**） Requst for Translations: 说是提供的材料中有中文，需要翻译成英文。
这个用google scloar翻译了，或者自己翻译了，让一个老外同事签字就可以了吧？
(***）Docomention to establish that the beneficairy will continue to work in
their claimed area of expertise. Evidence that may be submitted to satisfy
this requirement includes, but is not limited to :
letters from current or prospective employers; Employ contracts; or A
statement from the beneficairy detailing plans on how they intend to
continue work in the united states
这个提供一个offer letter吗？我的contract是每年签一次。
从申请到有这个结果，被摧残得木有一点生气了。 |
b*********r
发帖数: 7139 | 2 honestly, a little bit weak case. But just try your best. 翻译不一定找老外，
中国朋友就行。你确定一共就交36页材料？ |
w****i
发帖数: 520 | 3 作为机械专业背景，这样的background也就差不多了，顶一下LZ
【在 b*********r 的大作中提到】
: honestly, a little bit weak case. But just try your best. 翻译不一定找老外，
: 中国朋友就行。你确定一共就交36页材料？
|
w****i
发帖数: 520 | 4 Did you PP?
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
: 希望大侠帮忙，感激中
: Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
: Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
: Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
: Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
: Review: 8 times for 4 journals
: Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
: Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
: IO(TS): 1113
|
b*********r
发帖数: 7139 | 5 希望IO也这么想
【在 w****i 的大作中提到】
: 作为机械专业背景，这样的background也就差不多了，顶一下LZ
|
o**y
发帖数: 1466 | 6 "may provide", "will have"这是绝对要避免的词。请考一下古看我以前发的贴子。
现在这些Officer一看到这样的词眼睛就发亮。 "will have"那就是将来会，言下之意
你老现在还没有怎么样，对不起，RFE.
好好准备，把有人用你过的东西的记录找出来，尤其是那个database. 祝好运。 |
f*****e
发帖数: 1889 | 7 如果引用不多, CONTRIBUTION一定要通过专家论证(推荐信).
前面有ID说了, 不要用"MAY PROVIDE", "WILL HAVE" 这些将来时的词. 另外, RFE中明
确说了, 不要泛泛而谈贡献. 一定要讲清楚你具体干了什么. 当然这并不是件容易的事
情. 一般的句式就是: 我发明了XX, 技术上的贡献是XX, 应用上的贡献是XX. |
H******r
发帖数: 2879 | |
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 9 thanks a lot for the kind help.
best wishes to everyone |
s********n
发帖数: 2071 | 10 Bless to "dinglvyuan " and good luck. |
|
|
f****e
发帖数: 43 | 11 中文材料可以自己翻译，然后自己签一份保证书,说明自己精通中英文，而且翻译真实
无误就好了。
例如:
i certify that this is a true and accurate of document from Chinese to
English. I am qualified to perform this translation because I am fluent in
both Chinese and English .
Good Luck! |
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 12 thanks the help
【在 f****e 的大作中提到】
: 中文材料可以自己翻译，然后自己签一份保证书,说明自己精通中英文，而且翻译真实
: 无误就好了。
: 例如:
: i certify that this is a true and accurate of document from Chinese to
: English. I am qualified to perform this translation because I am fluent in
: both Chinese and English .
: Good Luck!
|
n***p
发帖数: 7668 | 13 Bless。
绿卡真是每个没有绿卡的人的心头之痛。
我回顾自己起草推荐信的时候，从本版学了很多东西。尽管自己的成果不是非常丰富，
但是我花很多时间读了别人对我的文章的引用，发现他们多多少少应用了我的成果。
于是以推荐人的口吻向IO说明我的成果的重要性。 我觉得这应该是我的I140能批准
的一个重要原因。当然，文章的引用数量应该也很重要。但是这是我们无法控制，也无法
发掘的。
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
: 希望大侠帮忙，感激中
: Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
: Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
: Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
: Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
: Review: 8 times for 4 journals
: Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
: Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
: IO(TS): 1113
|
n***p
发帖数: 7668 | 14 另外，我的律师在论证Contribution 的时候，基本都是引用的独立推荐信的内容。
文章的引用数据放在了对于Authorship的论证里面。
当然，IO读Petition Letter时应该会全局考虑，也就是所谓Totality。
你的引用数据比较低，那就深入发掘一下其他方面。
Bless。
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
: 希望大侠帮忙，感激中
: Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
: Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
: Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
: Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
: Review: 8 times for 4 journals
: Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
: Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
: IO(TS): 1113
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 15 thank you so much~~~
【在 n***p 的大作中提到】
: 另外，我的律师在论证Contribution 的时候，基本都是引用的独立推荐信的内容。
: 文章的引用数据放在了对于Authorship的论证里面。
: 当然，IO读Petition Letter时应该会全局考虑，也就是所谓Totality。
: 你的引用数据比较低，那就深入发掘一下其他方面。
: Bless。
|
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 16 RFE的response寄出去了嘛？
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: thank you so much~~~
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 17 木友呢。快到时间了，崩溃中
牛叉的老板最近给安排的事情特别多,哭～～～～
【在 e******r 的大作中提到】
: RFE的response寄出去了嘛？
|
y***o
发帖数: 246 | 18 This is a typical RFE that I saw in this board, the IO already told you how
to prepare the RFE, such as "Testimony and/or support letters from experts
which discuss the beneficairy's contributions of major significance". As
long as you can statisfy him with more evidence, you will get approved. Find
more RFE posts in the board, such as annette etc. The approval of your
case would be encouraging to me.
Bless~~~~~~~~ |
G*******d
发帖数: 605 | 19 一点建议:
引用中，引你文章的人是否大牛？ 引用的刊物是否大牛？找出引文中的段落来说明你
的文章的重要性,是否大牛。
it is best 能有他们的推荐信，且在信中有强调。 |
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 20 pat pat。1.挖掘以下你的引用，看看能不能从中找出有用的东西，例如，文中提到你
的名字的，还有虽然是脚标，但明确说明用到了你的工作的，例如你那个数据库。
2. 增加几封推荐信，不是independent的，但是用了你的研究结果的也考虑一下。你的
引用虽然不多，如果分布10个以上的国家，也提一下。
3.再查查最近引用增加了没？
continue working 那个，employment certification就行，在加上你白活一下你
下一步的计划，如果有提交的paper，也列上。
仅供参考， big bless～
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 木友呢。快到时间了，崩溃中
: 牛叉的老板最近给安排的事情特别多,哭～～～～
|
|
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 21 thanks, will do
how
Find
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: This is a typical RFE that I saw in this board, the IO already told you how
: to prepare the RFE, such as "Testimony and/or support letters from experts
: which discuss the beneficairy's contributions of major significance". As
: long as you can statisfy him with more evidence, you will get approved. Find
: more RFE posts in the board, such as annette etc. The approval of your
: case would be encouraging to me.
: Bless~~~~~~~~
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 22 呀，没想到这个牛人的问题，谢～
【在 G*******d 的大作中提到】
: 一点建议:
: 引用中，引你文章的人是否大牛？ 引用的刊物是否大牛？找出引文中的段落来说明你
: 的文章的重要性,是否大牛。
: it is best 能有他们的推荐信，且在信中有强调。
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 23 谢谢姐姐。国家查了一下，都在米国，惨了点
employment certification能用offer letter吗？还是得找department hr的人开一个
证明？
【在 e******r 的大作中提到】
: pat pat。1.挖掘以下你的引用，看看能不能从中找出有用的东西，例如，文中提到你
: 的名字的，还有虽然是脚标，但明确说明用到了你的工作的，例如你那个数据库。
: 2. 增加几封推荐信，不是independent的，但是用了你的研究结果的也考虑一下。你的
: 引用虽然不多，如果分布10个以上的国家，也提一下。
: 3.再查查最近引用增加了没？
: continue working 那个，employment certification就行，在加上你白活一下你
: 下一步的计划，如果有提交的paper，也列上。
: 仅供参考， big bless～
|
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 24 我用的是offer letter，但我的case还没消息呢，不好误导你，还是知道的来说说吧
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢姐姐。国家查了一下，都在米国，惨了点
: employment certification能用offer letter吗？还是得找department hr的人开一个
: 证明？
|
c******g
发帖数: 9273 | 25 一共就36页材料？
很厉害啊，这都行啊？
看来contribution真的是最容易RFE的了
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
: 希望大侠帮忙，感激中
: Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
: Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
: Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
: Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
: Review: 8 times for 4 journals
: Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
: Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
: IO(TS): 1113
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 26 thanks，主要找hr的结果说要和boss谈，让boss发话，烦
【在 e******r 的大作中提到】
: 我用的是offer letter，但我的case还没消息呢，不好误导你，还是知道的来说说吧
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 27 莫笑话，料少，木有办法
【在 c******g 的大作中提到】
: 一共就36页材料？
: 很厉害啊，这都行啊？
: 看来contribution真的是最容易RFE的了
|
c******g
发帖数: 9273 | 28 挺奇怪的啊。你又不是EB1b
随便HR开个信不就行了么？
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: thanks，主要找hr的结果说要和boss谈，让boss发话，烦
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 29 小米拽得很拉风
【在 c******g 的大作中提到】
: 挺奇怪的啊。你又不是EB1b
: 随便HR开个信不就行了么？
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 30 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
希望大侠帮忙，感激中
Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
Review: 8 times for 4 journals
Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
IO(TS): 1111
RFE:
核心是 2 authorship，3 judge 是satisfied,但是1 不满足，需要补充材料。
下面是详细内容：
*
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific,s cholarly, articistic
, athletic, or business-related contributiosn of major significance in the
field.
The petitioner has provided:
------ Testimonial letters
------Published journal articles
This criterion has not been met becuase the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. The published journal articles
establish that the petitioner has made original contributions to the field.
However, she has not established that her original contributions are of
major significance. The petitioner has submitted evidence that she
constructed a mathematical model for describing certain phenomena, although
one of her reference letter describe this "may provide new insight into
this phenomena". Initial promising results are not evidence of contributions
that are already recognized as having a major significance in the field.
Further the record fails to establish that other researchers began using her
model rather than the traditional models. She also submitted evidence that
she constructed a large database and indicated that it is accurate and
informative for describing the related phenomena. Another referred professor
writes that the database will have a profound importance in the study of
the related phenomena. However, the record lacks evidence of other
scientists or institutions which have began to use her database. To assist
in determining whether her contributions are original and OF MAJOR
significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
(1) Objective documentary evidence of the significance of her contribution
to the field;
(2) Documentary evidence that people throught the fild currently consider
the beneficiary's work important.
(3) Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficairy's contributions of major significance;
(4) Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contributions has
provoked widespead publich commentary in the field or has been widely cited;
and
(5) Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to
(5-1) Contracts with companies using the beneficairy's products;
(5-2) Licensed technology being used by others;
(5-3) Patents currently being utilized an shown to be significant to the
field.
Note: letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about hte beneficairy's contribution and must explain, in details,
how the contribution was original (not merely replicating the work of others
) and how the contributions were of "major " significance. General
statements regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported
by documentary evidence are insufficient.
Additionally, meeting the minimum regulatory criteria outlined above, along
will not establish eligibility for the E11 immigrant classification. Any
evidence submitted in response to this request, should also articulate how
the evidence establishes that the beneficiary possesses the required high
level of expertise for the E11 immigrant classification.
(**） Requst for Translations: 说是提供的材料中有中文，需要翻译成英文。
这个用google scloar翻译了，或者自己翻译了，让一个老外同事签字就可以了吧？
(***）Docomention to establish that the beneficairy will continue to work in
their claimed area of expertise. Evidence that may be submitted to satisfy
this requirement includes, but is not limited to :
letters from current or prospective employers; Employ contracts; or A
statement from the beneficairy detailing plans on how they intend to
continue work in the united states
这个提供一个offer letter吗？我的contract是每年签一次。
从申请到有这个结果，被摧残得木有一点生气了。 |
|
|
b*********r
发帖数: 7139 | 31 honestly, a little bit weak case. But just try your best. 翻译不一定找老外，
中国朋友就行。你确定一共就交36页材料？ |
w****i
发帖数: 520 | 32 作为机械专业背景，这样的background也就差不多了，顶一下LZ
【在 b*********r 的大作中提到】
: honestly, a little bit weak case. But just try your best. 翻译不一定找老外，
: 中国朋友就行。你确定一共就交36页材料？
|
w****i
发帖数: 520 | 33 Did you PP?
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
: 希望大侠帮忙，感激中
: Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
: Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
: Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
: Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
: Review: 8 times for 4 journals
: Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
: Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
: IO(TS): 1111
|
b*********r
发帖数: 7139 | 34 希望IO也这么想
【在 w****i 的大作中提到】
: 作为机械专业背景，这样的background也就差不多了，顶一下LZ
|
o**y
发帖数: 1466 | 35 "may provide", "will have"这是绝对要避免的词。请考一下古看我以前发的贴子。
现在这些Officer一看到这样的词眼睛就发亮。 "will have"那就是将来会，言下之意
你老现在还没有怎么样，对不起，RFE.
好好准备，把有人用你过的东西的记录找出来，尤其是那个database. 祝好运。 |
f*****e
发帖数: 1889 | 36 如果引用不多, CONTRIBUTION一定要通过专家论证(推荐信).
前面有ID说了, 不要用"MAY PROVIDE", "WILL HAVE" 这些将来时的词. 另外, RFE中明
确说了, 不要泛泛而谈贡献. 一定要讲清楚你具体干了什么. 当然这并不是件容易的事
情. 一般的句式就是: 我发明了XX, 技术上的贡献是XX, 应用上的贡献是XX. |
H******r
发帖数: 2879 | |
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 38 thanks a lot for the kind help.
best wishes to everyone |
s********n
发帖数: 2071 | 39 Bless to "dinglvyuan " and good luck. |
f****e
发帖数: 43 | 40 中文材料可以自己翻译，然后自己签一份保证书,说明自己精通中英文，而且翻译真实
无误就好了。
例如:
i certify that this is a true and accurate of document from Chinese to
English. I am qualified to perform this translation because I am fluent in
both Chinese and English .
Good Luck! |
|
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 41 thanks the help
【在 f****e 的大作中提到】
: 中文材料可以自己翻译，然后自己签一份保证书,说明自己精通中英文，而且翻译真实
: 无误就好了。
: 例如:
: i certify that this is a true and accurate of document from Chinese to
: English. I am qualified to perform this translation because I am fluent in
: both Chinese and English .
: Good Luck!
|
n***p
发帖数: 7668 | 42 Bless。
绿卡真是每个没有绿卡的人的心头之痛。
我回顾自己起草推荐信的时候，从本版学了很多东西。尽管自己的成果不是非常丰富，
但是我花很多时间读了别人对我的文章的引用，发现他们多多少少应用了我的成果。
于是以推荐人的口吻向IO说明我的成果的重要性。 我觉得这应该是我的I140能批准
的一个重要原因。当然，文章的引用数量应该也很重要。但是这是我们无法控制，也无法
发掘的。
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
: 希望大侠帮忙，感激中
: Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
: Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
: Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
: Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
: Review: 8 times for 4 journals
: Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
: Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
: IO(TS): 1111
|
n***p
发帖数: 7668 | 43 另外，我的律师在论证Contribution 的时候，基本都是引用的独立推荐信的内容。
文章的引用数据放在了对于Authorship的论证里面。
当然，IO读Petition Letter时应该会全局考虑，也就是所谓Totality。
你的引用数据比较低，那就深入发掘一下其他方面。
Bless。
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
: 希望大侠帮忙，感激中
: Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
: Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
: Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
: Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
: Review: 8 times for 4 journals
: Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
: Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
: IO(TS): 1111
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 44 thank you so much~~~
【在 n***p 的大作中提到】
: 另外，我的律师在论证Contribution 的时候，基本都是引用的独立推荐信的内容。
: 文章的引用数据放在了对于Authorship的论证里面。
: 当然，IO读Petition Letter时应该会全局考虑，也就是所谓Totality。
: 你的引用数据比较低，那就深入发掘一下其他方面。
: Bless。
|
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 45 RFE的response寄出去了嘛？
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: thank you so much~~~
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 46 木友呢。快到时间了，崩溃中
牛叉的老板最近给安排的事情特别多,哭～～～～
【在 e******r 的大作中提到】
: RFE的response寄出去了嘛？
|
y***o
发帖数: 246 | 47 This is a typical RFE that I saw in this board, the IO already told you how
to prepare the RFE, such as "Testimony and/or support letters from experts
which discuss the beneficairy's contributions of major significance". As
long as you can statisfy him with more evidence, you will get approved. Find
more RFE posts in the board, such as annette etc. The approval of your
case would be encouraging to me.
Bless~~~~~~~~ |
G*******d
发帖数: 605 | 48 一点建议:
引用中，引你文章的人是否大牛？ 引用的刊物是否大牛？找出引文中的段落来说明你
的文章的重要性,是否大牛。
it is best 能有他们的推荐信，且在信中有强调。 |
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 49 pat pat。1.挖掘以下你的引用，看看能不能从中找出有用的东西，例如，文中提到你
的名字的，还有虽然是脚标，但明确说明用到了你的工作的，例如你那个数据库。
2. 增加几封推荐信，不是independent的，但是用了你的研究结果的也考虑一下。你的
引用虽然不多，如果分布10个以上的国家，也提一下。
3.再查查最近引用增加了没？
continue working 那个，employment certification就行，在加上你白活一下你
下一步的计划，如果有提交的paper，也列上。
仅供参考， big bless～
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 木友呢。快到时间了，崩溃中
: 牛叉的老板最近给安排的事情特别多,哭～～～～
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 50 thanks, will do
how
Find
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: This is a typical RFE that I saw in this board, the IO already told you how
: to prepare the RFE, such as "Testimony and/or support letters from experts
: which discuss the beneficairy's contributions of major significance". As
: long as you can statisfy him with more evidence, you will get approved. Find
: more RFE posts in the board, such as annette etc. The approval of your
: case would be encouraging to me.
: Bless~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 51 呀，没想到这个牛人的问题，谢～
【在 G*******d 的大作中提到】
: 一点建议:
: 引用中，引你文章的人是否大牛？ 引用的刊物是否大牛？找出引文中的段落来说明你
: 的文章的重要性,是否大牛。
: it is best 能有他们的推荐信，且在信中有强调。
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 52 谢谢姐姐。国家查了一下，都在米国，惨了点
employment certification能用offer letter吗？还是得找department hr的人开一个
证明？
【在 e******r 的大作中提到】
: pat pat。1.挖掘以下你的引用，看看能不能从中找出有用的东西，例如，文中提到你
: 的名字的，还有虽然是脚标，但明确说明用到了你的工作的，例如你那个数据库。
: 2. 增加几封推荐信，不是independent的，但是用了你的研究结果的也考虑一下。你的
: 引用虽然不多，如果分布10个以上的国家，也提一下。
: 3.再查查最近引用增加了没？
: continue working 那个，employment certification就行，在加上你白活一下你
: 下一步的计划，如果有提交的paper，也列上。
: 仅供参考， big bless～
|
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 53 我用的是offer letter，但我的case还没消息呢，不好误导你，还是知道的来说说吧
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢姐姐。国家查了一下，都在米国，惨了点
: employment certification能用offer letter吗？还是得找department hr的人开一个
: 证明？
|
c******g
发帖数: 9273 | 54 一共就36页材料？
很厉害啊，这都行啊？
看来contribution真的是最容易RFE的了
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
: 希望大侠帮忙，感激中
: Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
: Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
: Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
: Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
: Review: 8 times for 4 journals
: Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
: Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
: IO(TS): 1111
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 55 thanks，主要找hr的结果说要和boss谈，让boss发话，烦
【在 e******r 的大作中提到】
: 我用的是offer letter，但我的case还没消息呢，不好误导你，还是知道的来说说吧
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 56 莫笑话，料少，木有办法
【在 c******g 的大作中提到】
: 一共就36页材料？
: 很厉害啊，这都行啊？
: 看来contribution真的是最容易RFE的了
|
c******g
发帖数: 9273 | 57 挺奇怪的啊。你又不是EB1b
随便HR开个信不就行了么？
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: thanks，主要找hr的结果说要和boss谈，让boss发话，烦
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 58 小米拽得很拉风
【在 c******g 的大作中提到】
: 挺奇怪的啊。你又不是EB1b
: 随便HR开个信不就行了么？
|
f*****e
发帖数: 1889 | |
m*****u
发帖数: 277 | 60 你材料才36页？
pl 16 pages + 1st page of publication （12）+ 8 reivew至少8页-》 难道你的5封
推荐信不占页数。。。
anyway, congratz!
【在 d********n 的大作中提到】
: 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
: 希望大侠帮忙，感激中
: Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
: Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
: Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
: Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
: Review: 8 times for 4 journals
: Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
: Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
: IO(TS): 1111
|
