M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 1 上周三得到rfe的，自己的case比较弱，但是因为要跳槽，所以硬头皮PP了。 本人，米
国博士，专业 chemical/biochemical engineering, 现在藤校当千老。文章8篇，一作
7篇，引用< 100；中国专利4个，美国专利一个。Review 23次(除了几个次的，其他都
是行业顶尖杂志)。IO承认了我的 authorship 和 judge of other work.但是
contribution被否了。详细的评价如下：
This criterion has not been met because the evident submitted does not show
that your contributions are considered to be of major significance to the
field of endeavor. Many of the letters of support were from individuals who
already knew you, and the letter of support were general in nature, and did
not establish your accomplishments are any greater than your peers. USCIS
does not find the totality of your work has risen to a major significance
within your field. In addition, while the petitioner was a co-inventor to
three Chinese patents and one US patent has been filed, this evidence does
not establish that your work has contributed major significant with the
field.
The petitioner has not established hi work has made a major significant
impact within your field at the time of filing this 1-140 petition.
+ Objective documentary evident of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the field
+ Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
the beneficiary’s work importance.
+Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary
’s contributions of major significance within the field.
+ Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to
+ Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products
+ Licensed technology being used by others
+ Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
我感觉IO着重看了我的推荐信，我的推荐信都是自己起草，然后让推荐人写的，感觉自
己比较失败，自吹自擂都没弄好。6个推荐信，4个是独立的，没有找欧洲的。现在看来
要多要几个推荐信。 我专利的license的合同放在exhibit里了，不知道是不是ＩＯ没
有看到。大家帮我出出主意，要如何回答这个IO。 个人感觉IO比较professional，以
后PP的人要小心。 |
n*********2
发帖数: 1760 | 2 Big bless!
我也担心被
RFE这个contribution我只要了5封推荐信。
个人觉得还是多要两封推荐信吧。是不是你的推荐信都说了他们怎么认识你的啊？为什
么IO说他们认识你呢？ |
n******y
发帖数: 1821 | |
m******r
发帖数: 854 | |
t******m
发帖数: 2402 | 5 bless!我只有5封推荐信，看来还得继续找啊。 |
i*****n
发帖数: 514 | |
M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 7 有的独立推荐人都在信上说自己并不认识我，基于我的学术做的推荐。 我估计我起草
的推荐信细节有问题，让人觉得我和推荐人熟。其实一面都没见过，全是我呕心沥血找
来的。 以后推荐信一定要小心。之前些推荐信的时候，不知道从哪里看到，说是推荐
信的重要性下降，主要是solid的东西。可是这个IO很关注这个推荐信。看来我要好好
准备另外的推荐信了。
【在 n*********2 的大作中提到】
: Big bless!
: 我也担心被
: RFE这个contribution我只要了5封推荐信。
: 个人觉得还是多要两封推荐信吧。是不是你的推荐信都说了他们怎么认识你的啊？为什
: 么IO说他们认识你呢？
|
l***c
发帖数: 199 | 8 这种RFE很常见。90%算是通过了。
很多人都是把authorship和judgement一删，再寄过去就过了
bless........
show
who
did
【在 M*****k 的大作中提到】
: 上周三得到rfe的，自己的case比较弱，但是因为要跳槽，所以硬头皮PP了。 本人，米
: 国博士，专业 chemical/biochemical engineering, 现在藤校当千老。文章8篇，一作
: 7篇，引用< 100；中国专利4个，美国专利一个。Review 23次(除了几个次的，其他都
: 是行业顶尖杂志)。IO承认了我的 authorship 和 judge of other work.但是
: contribution被否了。详细的评价如下：
: This criterion has not been met because the evident submitted does not show
: that your contributions are considered to be of major significance to the
: field of endeavor. Many of the letters of support were from individuals who
: already knew you, and the letter of support were general in nature, and did
: not establish your accomplishments are any greater than your peers. USCIS
|
|
d********7
发帖数: 1964 | |
M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 10 美国的还行，欧洲的实在无语了。
【在 d********7 的大作中提到】
: 就怕再要推荐信，难呀
|
b**********e
发帖数: 2042 | |
M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 12 刚才去跟国内的朋友和老板联系了，才发现国内一个企业用我们的专利赚狠了，那个企
业答应开个利用专利，盈利数千万元的证明信。这个能不能部分回答IO对于patent的疑
问？ 会不会数千万太多了？？让IO觉得不可能？ 我也不知道企业赚了多少，反正一分
钱我都没分到。 |
M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 13 朋友，咱们要看开些，就是RFE，咱也要豁出去拼了。不过bless你直接AD
【在 m******r 的大作中提到】
: bless. 真是容易RFE,真是担心.
|
L**S
发帖数: 7833 | 14 估计你的pl和rl写的不够详细，比较泛泛。
后面注意下细节就行 |
