z*****g
发帖数: 306 | 1 Help please.
One big professor cited my work in his review as this: "XXX et al. treated
prostate cancer cells by the approach of yyy, with good result in vivo.”
My question is if I can add this "good result" into the pettition letter to highlight contribution.
Another professor in his review said:" yyy is uncommon. Serveral models failed, but xxx can do it and this model will be useful for ..."
Same question if this "uncommon" and "useful" will be of good weigh.
Xie Xie!! |
z*****g
发帖数: 306 | |
b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 3 相当好了，比我的那篇用词要强。
当然，这个highlight 请切勿仅仅只放在PL里面，而是应该首先放到RL 里面。不要自
己说出来，自己说出来的 主观上就被IO判定为not objective.
to highlight contribution.
failed, but xxx can do it and this model will be useful for ..."
【在 z*****g 的大作中提到】
: Help please...
|
z*****g
发帖数: 306 | 4 大蜜蜂 zheng mang! You are so busy these days!
Duo Xie.
I just have enough confidence about the words "good result", "useful". |
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 5 很不错，多客观的证据啊。你自己在引号前后再加上一些闪闪发光的词，就更有效果了
to highlight contribution.
failed, but xxx can do it and this model will be useful for ..."
【在 z*****g 的大作中提到】
: Help please...
|
g*******3
发帖数: 2520 | 6 这个显然非常positive啊。放在PL和RL里互相映照。 |
z*****g
发帖数: 306 | 7 Duo Xie... Thank you!
No money. I have to DIY and alway have no enough confidence.. |
