O*C
发帖数: 649 | 1 一般大家都claim peer－review，这个我也有10来个。但是觉得比较弱，想到了还写过
review，能用这个claim judge others么？ |
O*C
发帖数: 649 | 2 有人知道吗？
【在 O*C 的大作中提到】
: 一般大家都claim peer－review，这个我也有10来个。但是觉得比较弱，想到了还写过
: review，能用这个claim judge others么？
|
z***b
发帖数: 4667 | 3 好像不太对路啊
【在 O*C 的大作中提到】
: 一般大家都claim peer－review，这个我也有10来个。但是觉得比较弱，想到了还写过
: review，能用这个claim judge others么？
|
c***x
发帖数: 1169 | 4 I do not know either, but below is my experience.
My boss got an invited review and I was the first author. I managed to get
the RL from that journal saying they invited ME for summarizing XX area due
to my niubility. My attorney add this part on the judging others, but she
used a little bit different title, like "cmuwx is the authority in XX area".
Then under this title, she added this one together with my ~10 review work. |
d*******n
发帖数: 4778 | 5 that review was an invited review?
if yes, maybe,
【在 O*C 的大作中提到】
: 一般大家都claim peer－review，这个我也有10来个。但是觉得比较弱，想到了还写过
: review，能用这个claim judge others么？
|
c*********8
发帖数: 1681 | |
O*C
发帖数: 649 | 7 有什么原因么？还是被rfe过？
【在 c*********8 的大作中提到】
: no, definitely not!
|
O*C
发帖数: 649 | 8 没有invited的信，只有review杂志上自己说写的人都是world leading expert。这个
有用么？
【在 d*******n 的大作中提到】
: that review was an invited review?
: if yes, maybe,
|
t********7
发帖数: 673 | 9 should have directly invitation for the purpose to judge others work.... |
