a********x
发帖数: 12 | 1 刚才收到RFE，说contribution没过，细节如下：希望版上的高手给支支招，看看怎么
一个思路来回复. 这个推荐信的他们说的不对；我五份只有一分不是independent的。
还有就是中文的引用原来在Google schloar查只有80,最近在知网查有230,不知道这个
怎么应用到RFE里面来。
本人做的比较基础，不知道怎么在短期内找到这种大量应用成果的例子。
还有就是不是说PP的RFE都是只有30天么？本人怎么给了84天？
谢谢大家先了。
You have submitted evidence of the following:
(1) several letters of support
(2) Your work has been cited ~300 times, according to Google scholar
(3) Your work has been published in notable journals, according to Google
scholar
(4) You invented an XXX technique to treat XXX for XXX
(5) Researchers from Australia implemented for XXX
(6) Prof. XX and XX requested XXX
USCIS has carefully reviewed the letters of support submitted on your behalf
and the theme is that your research has helped the field. This criterion
has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show that your
contributions are considered to be of major significance to the field of
endeavor. Many of the the letters of support were from individuals who
already knew you, and the letters of support were general in nature and did
not establish your accomplishments are any greater than your peers. USCIS
recognizes your work on XXX technique, and considers this original research;
however, USCIS does not find the totality of your work has risen to a major
significance within your field. Given your publication rate, and citation
record it has not been established your work has made a major significant
impact within your field. USCIS understands your citation record is higher
than the average citation rate. While USCIS considers the citation record
this is not the only factor that determines whether the petitioner's work
has made a major significant contribution. Aside from your citation record,
and a handful of researchers who have reference and used your work, the
evidence does not establish it has made a major significance contribution to
the field. To assist in determining whether of your contributions are
original and of major significance, your may submit:
(1) Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution
to the field
(2) USCIS understands you have provided your citation record, but it is
unclear how many of those citations are considered independent citations.
Please submit your full independent citation record.
(3) Evidence of your work being implemented by others, aside from being
cited, or a group of Australian researchers and two U.S. researchers who
have referenced and used your work.
Possible evidence may include but is not limited to:
a. contracts with companies using of your products
b. licensed technology being used by others
c. Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field
(4) any other relevant evidence
Note: letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about of your contribution and must explain in detail, how the
contribution was "original" (not merely replicating the work of others) and
how they were of "major" significance. General statements regarding the
importance of the endeavors are insufficient. |
|
