x****g
发帖数: 721 | 1 如下所示，不知道是不是应该把第四条拆散了放在其他三条当中。是不是四条有些多？
多谢！
(1) Original scientific or scholarly research contributions to the field,
as documented by the expert opinions of experts (Exhibit _);
(2) Published scholarly articles in the field’s most distinguished peer-
reviewed journals, as documented by objective and subjective expert
testimony, citations received, and published articles (Exhibits _, _ ,_).
According to expert testimony, Dr. xxx’s articles have heavily influenced
and advanced the field;
(3) Participated as a judge of the work of others, as documented by
journal and conference invitations to serve as a journal referee and
conference proceeding referee (Exhibit _, see also Exhibit _ for expert
testimony); and
(4) Other comparable evidence: Dr. xxx was a Recipient of major awards in
recorgnition of her outstanding research achievement and has been invited
to speak at several internationally recognized conferences (Exhibit _). | d***y
发帖数: 8107 | 2 木桶原理，2条就够了的1B，多claim任意一条相对弱项，都是隐患 | d***i
发帖数: 437 | 3 how major the award is ? | x****g
发帖数: 721 | 4 本身也是一个小领域，在这个小领域大家都知道的一个会议上面得的年度Award of
Outstanding Research Articles.
【在 d***i 的大作中提到】
: how major the award is ?
|
|
