e*****m
发帖数: 320 | 1 前阵子报过状态，今天终于从律师那里拿到RFE NOTICE了。果然是传说中的NSC 0002
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/33320413_0_1.html
PL上面律师一共CLAIM了四条，RFE的评价分别如下：
1. Published material in professional publications written by others about
the beneficiary's work in the academic field. Such material shall include
the title, date and author of the material, and any necessary translation.
You have provided: citation records.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicates that
the materials were published material that related to the beneficiary's
work in their academic field. Articles which cite or reference the
beneficiary's work are not about the beneficiary, but rather are about the
individual author's own work.
2. Evidence of beneficiary's participation, either individually or on a
panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied academic
field.
The criterion has been met.
3. Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
You has provided: letters from peers and colleagues, patent applications and
evidence of conference participation.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary has made original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
4. Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly books or articles
in the academic field.
You have provided: publication and citation records.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence is incomplete. Please
submit a complete record of the scholarly books or articles in the academic
field that the beneficiary has authored. You may submit:
Updated results from scholay literature search website that show the
beneficiary's citation record excluding cites by the beneficiary, the
beneficiary's coauthors and the beneficiary's research group members.
大致内容如上，我的感觉是：1. 律师错把引用文章的情况发到MEDIA REPORT上面去了
？这个根本就不应该CLAIM？
2. 对REVIEW无异议。
3. 质疑CONTRIBUTIONS？这个我应该怎么处理？
4. 质疑AUTHORSHIP。感觉0002是建议提供引用文章的LIST，并且区分自引和他引。
还请大家多多帮助，谢谢！ |
e*****m
发帖数: 320 | 2 此外就是上班以后有一两个PROVISIONAL PATENT，这个可以作为支持材料么？
that
【在 e*****m 的大作中提到】
: 前阵子报过状态，今天终于从律师那里拿到RFE NOTICE了。果然是传说中的NSC 0002
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/33320413_0_1.html
: PL上面律师一共CLAIM了四条，RFE的评价分别如下：
: 1. Published material in professional publications written by others about
: the beneficiary's work in the academic field. Such material shall include
: the title, date and author of the material, and any necessary translation.
: You have provided: citation records.
: This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicates that
: the materials were published material that related to the beneficiary's
: work in their academic field. Articles which cite or reference the
|
t*********r
发帖数: 4143 | |
s*****n
发帖数: 741 | 4 说过多少次了，patent没有产业化，或者没有应用成果的一定不要claim，你得律师吃
shi的。这都不知道 |
j****e
发帖数: 826 | 5 首先建议你好好研究一下版上大家RFE的经验，特别是对于0002的
看起来你好像还不太了解这个杀手啊
Media report可以claim，但是你要证明别人是在描述和评价你的工作，而不仅仅是一
个简单的引用。这个要从你的引文里面对于你的工作的大段的描述和讨论里去找。
Contribution是最重要的，这个你一定要好好应对，可以考虑增加独立的推荐信，着重
描述你的研究的originality，impact，significance，要写得仔细，也要写得让
layperson也能看懂。
Authorship当然是要列所有的publication的全文，journal和conference的介绍。当然
也要提供引用文章的list，列好year, insitution, country等等，只用列独立引用。
that
【在 e*****m 的大作中提到】
: 前阵子报过状态，今天终于从律师那里拿到RFE NOTICE了。果然是传说中的NSC 0002
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/33320413_0_1.html
: PL上面律师一共CLAIM了四条，RFE的评价分别如下：
: 1. Published material in professional publications written by others about
: the beneficiary's work in the academic field. Such material shall include
: the title, date and author of the material, and any necessary translation.
: You have provided: citation records.
: This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicates that
: the materials were published material that related to the beneficiary's
: work in their academic field. Articles which cite or reference the
|
y**********9
发帖数: 566 | 6 楼主不必着急，你的律师水平一般，你自己再按照他说的好好整理一下就行 |
e*****m
发帖数: 320 | 7 非常感谢！
【在 j****e 的大作中提到】
: 首先建议你好好研究一下版上大家RFE的经验，特别是对于0002的
: 看起来你好像还不太了解这个杀手啊
: Media report可以claim，但是你要证明别人是在描述和评价你的工作，而不仅仅是一
: 个简单的引用。这个要从你的引文里面对于你的工作的大段的描述和讨论里去找。
: Contribution是最重要的，这个你一定要好好应对，可以考虑增加独立的推荐信，着重
: 描述你的研究的originality，impact，significance，要写得仔细，也要写得让
: layperson也能看懂。
: Authorship当然是要列所有的publication的全文，journal和conference的介绍。当然
: 也要提供引用文章的list，列好year, insitution, country等等，只用列独立引用。
:
|
e*****m
发帖数: 320 | 8 谢谢！
【在 y**********9 的大作中提到】
: 楼主不必着急，你的律师水平一般，你自己再按照他说的好好整理一下就行
|
e*****m
发帖数: 320 | 9 前阵子报过状态，今天终于从律师那里拿到RFE NOTICE了。果然是传说中的NSC 0002
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/33320413_0_1.html
PL上面律师一共CLAIM了四条，RFE的评价分别如下：
1. Published material in professional publications written by others about
the beneficiary's work in the academic field. Such material shall include
the title, date and author of the material, and any necessary translation.
You have provided: citation records.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicates that
the materials were published material that related to the beneficiary's
work in their academic field. Articles which cite or reference the
beneficiary's work are not about the beneficiary, but rather are about the
individual author's own work.
2. Evidence of beneficiary's participation, either individually or on a
panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied academic
field.
The criterion has been met.
3. Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
You has provided: letters from peers and colleagues, patent applications and
evidence of conference participation.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary has made original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
4. Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly books or articles
in the academic field.
You have provided: publication and citation records.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence is incomplete. Please
submit a complete record of the scholarly books or articles in the academic
field that the beneficiary has authored. You may submit:
Updated results from scholay literature search website that show the
beneficiary's citation record excluding cites by the beneficiary, the
beneficiary's coauthors and the beneficiary's research group members.
大致内容如上，我的感觉是：1. 律师错把引用文章的情况发到MEDIA REPORT上面去了
？这个根本就不应该CLAIM？
2. 对REVIEW无异议。
3. 质疑CONTRIBUTIONS？这个我应该怎么处理？
4. 质疑AUTHORSHIP。感觉0002是建议提供引用文章的LIST，并且区分自引和他引。
还请大家多多帮助，谢谢！ |
e*****m
发帖数: 320 | 10 此外就是上班以后有一两个PROVISIONAL PATENT，这个可以作为支持材料么？
that
【在 e*****m 的大作中提到】
: 前阵子报过状态，今天终于从律师那里拿到RFE NOTICE了。果然是传说中的NSC 0002
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/33320413_0_1.html
: PL上面律师一共CLAIM了四条，RFE的评价分别如下：
: 1. Published material in professional publications written by others about
: the beneficiary's work in the academic field. Such material shall include
: the title, date and author of the material, and any necessary translation.
: You have provided: citation records.
: This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicates that
: the materials were published material that related to the beneficiary's
: work in their academic field. Articles which cite or reference the
|
|
|
t*********r
发帖数: 4143 | |
s*****n
发帖数: 741 | 12 说过多少次了，patent没有产业化，或者没有应用成果的一定不要claim，你得律师吃
shi的。这都不知道 |
j****e
发帖数: 826 | 13 首先建议你好好研究一下版上大家RFE的经验，特别是对于0002的
看起来你好像还不太了解这个杀手啊
Media report可以claim，但是你要证明别人是在描述和评价你的工作，而不仅仅是一
个简单的引用。这个要从你的引文里面对于你的工作的大段的描述和讨论里去找。
Contribution是最重要的，这个你一定要好好应对，可以考虑增加独立的推荐信，着重
描述你的研究的originality，impact，significance，要写得仔细，也要写得让
layperson也能看懂。
Authorship当然是要列所有的publication的全文，journal和conference的介绍。当然
也要提供引用文章的list，列好year, insitution, country等等，只用列独立引用。
that
【在 e*****m 的大作中提到】
: 前阵子报过状态，今天终于从律师那里拿到RFE NOTICE了。果然是传说中的NSC 0002
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/33320413_0_1.html
: PL上面律师一共CLAIM了四条，RFE的评价分别如下：
: 1. Published material in professional publications written by others about
: the beneficiary's work in the academic field. Such material shall include
: the title, date and author of the material, and any necessary translation.
: You have provided: citation records.
: This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicates that
: the materials were published material that related to the beneficiary's
: work in their academic field. Articles which cite or reference the
|
y**********9
发帖数: 566 | 14 楼主不必着急，你的律师水平一般，你自己再按照他说的好好整理一下就行 |
e*****m
发帖数: 320 | 15 非常感谢！
【在 j****e 的大作中提到】
: 首先建议你好好研究一下版上大家RFE的经验，特别是对于0002的
: 看起来你好像还不太了解这个杀手啊
: Media report可以claim，但是你要证明别人是在描述和评价你的工作，而不仅仅是一
: 个简单的引用。这个要从你的引文里面对于你的工作的大段的描述和讨论里去找。
: Contribution是最重要的，这个你一定要好好应对，可以考虑增加独立的推荐信，着重
: 描述你的研究的originality，impact，significance，要写得仔细，也要写得让
: layperson也能看懂。
: Authorship当然是要列所有的publication的全文，journal和conference的介绍。当然
: 也要提供引用文章的list，列好year, insitution, country等等，只用列独立引用。
:
|
e*****m
发帖数: 320 | 16 谢谢！
【在 y**********9 的大作中提到】
: 楼主不必着急，你的律师水平一般，你自己再按照他说的好好整理一下就行
|
