s*******s
发帖数: 9926 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
发信人: annaling89 (Anna), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: 支持反SCA5, 请给丁右立议员发e-mail
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 6 21:52:08 2014, 美东)
兄弟姐妹们：
姐妹们
刚刚给舊金山丁右立办公室打了电话，他的助手说：如果我们每个人发动每个家庭每个
人给他写Email，效果会更好！（中英文既可）因为他们要用数据说话！我们发动所有
的同胞写信给我们的议员！加州众议员丁右立的Email:assemblymember.ting@assembly
.ca.gov 他是我们尽力争取的一票。 最好是自己能添加一些自己的意见, 能够写一篇
自己的文章是最好, 反正能够发那么多遍, 不会吃亏.
謝謝！
英文模板：Dear Assemblyman:
I have read over and analyzed the California Legislature Senate
Constitutional Amendment #5 and I am very troubled and concerned. This
Amendment, if passed, will bring the State of California back into the era
of Brown v. Board of Education, a time when systematic racism was not only
allowed but widely embraced by the government. This is a clear and obvious
construct and attempt to create institutional racism across the board for
our public education system. The University of California and the
California State University is the largest collective group of public
universities in this country. The integrity and standard behind our proud
University of California and the California State University systems cannot
be diminished back into an era that has been the black-eye and the darkest
moments in the history of the United States of America—racism. The
University of California and the California State University systems has
been successful because these two systems have been built on measuring, and
enrolling students based on integrity, character, and hard work of the
individual students, not the color of their skin. These two systems have
turned a blind eye towards color with a progressive stance on accomplishment
and merit. So why has Ed Hernandez been allowed to take this backwards
thinking and backwards moving Senate Constitutional Amendment #5 so far?
]The Senate Constitutional Amendment #5 is appallingly unacceptable for the
most progressive state of the union. We cannot strive to have the best
public universities if we force our universities to enroll students, not
based on merit, but based on the color of one’s skin. I understand the
disparaging difficulties that some ethnicities tend of have, however,
success is not a stranger to hard work and accomplishments and California
cannot stymie or punish those who work hard to accomplish an opportunity to
enroll at one of California’s public universities only to be turned away
because their skin color does not match that of the required quota—that is
institutional racism, the word that symbolizes the worst moments of the
United States, a word that the United States of America is still trying to
forget. So please explain to me this, why are trying to reestablish
institutional racism?
The Senate Constitutional Amendment #5 cannot be allowed to pass. This
amendment is a leap in the opposite direction and will potentially open the
floodgates to more prejudicial laws. If this amendment is allowed to pass,
then we might as well speed up Hernandez’s agenda and prohibit women from
voting, and reintroduce cotton plantations in the south.
The people of California are hard working. Let the laws reflect and reward
hard work.
Sincerely,
Dear XXX:
I am writing this email to bring to your attention on upcoming vote on SCA-5
, authored by Sen. Ed Hernandez. This bill is essentially another effort
trying to insert race as a factor in future University of California
admission. I firmly believe that this is against the fundamental belief of
US legal system that everyone should be equal regardless his/her race.
Therefore, I strongly urge you to vote NO on this matter. Our community
willwatch this vote very closely.
Thank you,XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. SCA-5 proposes using race as a factor for
admission decision making for California public university system. I urge
you to fight against SCA-5. Just as Martin Luther King said 41 years ago,
nochildren should be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content
oftheir character. Your child(ren) deserve this dream. Every American child
deserves this dream. Don't you agree? It is about right or wrong. The
answerdifferentiates a statesman from those politicians.
It's your choice which side you would like to be. Every voter who shares
thesame dream with Martin Luther King will watch your choice, and decide who
they are going to vote for next time. Therefore, I strongly urge you to
voteNO on this matter. Our community will watch this vote very closely.
Best regards,XXX
中文模板，欢迎有才，有想法的兄弟姐妹补充
尊敬的丁议员：
1996年，加州通过了著名的209提案，即加州民权提案。 该提案修改加州宪法，禁止政
府在公共教育中考虑种族，性别，族群因素。在209提案的帮助下，大量优秀学生通过
自己的努力进入加州公立大学学习而不必考虑种族配额的限制。SCA5是想删除209提案
中任何提到“公共教育”的文字，实质上是允许公立大学录取是根据种族/性别/族群等
因素歧视申请者，是历史的大倒退！！一旦该法案通过，大批优秀的学生因为自己的肤
色被挡在加州大学门外，这必定会导致加州大学系统质量的下降。加州大学系统是加州
人才的主要输出地，其质量的降低必然会使加州的竞争力降低。
请您为了加州的未来，为了美国的未来，反对SCA5提案！！！！
谢谢！！！
| s*******s
发帖数: 9926 | | t***h
发帖数: 2924 | 3 这是上他当了吧.电话他不能不接,因为不接就不知道是什么事情打进来的.
但是一旦接了电话,就不能挂断. 而email, 一看标题,就知道了,
马上delete或者跟本就不看了.
不要上当啊!!! 要打电话.也要发email. 不能只发email.
assembly
【在 s*******s 的大作中提到】
: http://nosca5.blogspot.com/2014/02/sca5.html
: 这边也有很多sample
: 欢迎取用
|
|
