由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Mathematics版 - 朱熹平的临门一脚的影响
相关主题
在perelman破解Poincare Conjecture事件中,曹/朱 有无抄袭?不要拿田是华人来说事。
who understands Perelman's work?丘成桐的"封顶"骗局基本落幕.
看着tao和ben green的online seminar讨论的那么辛苦,老张为什么不去解释(指点)一下?请大家推荐数学方面的书籍
Morgan的ICM发言Christodoulou and Hamilton Receive 2011 Shaw Prize
最近五十年数学界激动人心的时刻2015院士候选人
陶哲轩对望月新一的证明很不爽 (转载)[转贴]庞加莱猜想-维数的玩笑
看看USA Today,曹朱被丘这么一闹,都成笑话了有人看了今天archive最后一篇文章没有?
佩雷尔曼获奖有没有牛牛简单介绍一下S.Smale
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: perelman话题: proof话题: university话题: conjecture
进入Mathematics版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
d*******g
发帖数: 1265
1
以下是摘自Perelman的Wikipedia条目中关于庞加莱猜想验证过程的介绍。第二部分是
朱熹平的工作。我个人猜测Perelman隐退数学界的动机之一是这个事件:他觉得数学界
的人太不纯粹了。
Verification
Since 2003, Perelman's program has attracted increasing attention from the
mathematical community. In April 2003, he accepted an invitation to visit
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, Stony Brook
University, Columbia University and New York University, where he gave a
series of talks on his work.[18]
Three independent groups of scholars have verified that Perelman's papers
contain all the essentials for a complete proof of the geometrization
conjecture:
1. On 25 May 2006, Bruce Kleiner and John Lott, both of the University of
Michigan, posted a paper on arXiv that fills in the details of Perelman's
proof of the Geometrization conjecture.[19] John Lott said in ICM2006, "It
has taken us some time to examine Perelman's work. This is partly due to the
originality of Perelman's work and partly to the technical sophistication
of his arguments. All indications are that his arguments are correct."
2. In June 2006, the Asian Journal of Mathematics published a paper by Zhu
Xiping of Sun Yat-sen University in China and Huai-Dong Cao of Lehigh
University in Pennsylvania, giving a complete description of Perelman's
proof of the Poincaré and the geometrization conjectures. The June 2006
paper claimed: "This proof should be considered as the crowning achievement
of the Hamilton-Perelman theory of Ricci flow."[20] (Asked about the paper,
Perelman said the pair had not contributed anything original, and had simply
reworked his proof because they "did not quite understand the argument".)[
18]
In November 2006, Cao and Zhu published an erratum disclosing that they had
failed to cite properly the previous work of Kleiner and Lott published in
2003. In the same issue, the AJM editorial board issued an apology for what
it called "incautions" in the Cao–Zhu paper.[21]
On December 3, 2006, Cao and Zhu retracted the original version of their
paper, which was titled "A Complete Proof of the Poincaré and
Geometrization Conjectures — Application of the Hamilton–Perelman Theory
of the Ricci Flow"[22] and posted a revised version, renamed, more modestly,
"Hamilton–Perelman's Proof of the Poincaré Conjecture and the
Geometrization Conjecture".[23] Rather than the grand claim of the original
abstract, "we give a complete proof", suggesting the proof is by the authors
, the revised abstract states: "we give a detailed exposition of a complete
proof". The authors also removed the phrase "crowning achievement" from the
abstract.
3. In July 2006, John Morgan of Columbia University and Gang Tian of the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology posted a paper on the arXiv titled, "
Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture". In this paper, they provide a
detailed version of Perelman's proof of the Poincaré conjecture.[24] On 24
August 2006, Morgan delivered a lecture at the ICM in Madrid on the Poincar
é conjecture.[25] This was followed up with the paper on the arXiv, "
Completion of the Proof of the Geometrization Conjecture" on 24 September
2008.
s**p
发帖数: 1097
2
laf.他要是能成为让Perelman退隐的原因,那确实该得奖:削弱敌人就是增强我军啊

Brook

【在 d*******g 的大作中提到】
: 以下是摘自Perelman的Wikipedia条目中关于庞加莱猜想验证过程的介绍。第二部分是
: 朱熹平的工作。我个人猜测Perelman隐退数学界的动机之一是这个事件:他觉得数学界
: 的人太不纯粹了。
: Verification
: Since 2003, Perelman's program has attracted increasing attention from the
: mathematical community. In April 2003, he accepted an invitation to visit
: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, Stony Brook
: University, Columbia University and New York University, where he gave a
: series of talks on his work.[18]
: Three independent groups of scholars have verified that Perelman's papers

l******r
发帖数: 18699
3
太丢人了,都替中山大学脸红
不过说实话,学术界这种剽窃别人credit的事情屡见不鲜,只不过没有猪草这次搞的这
么轰动而已

Brook

【在 d*******g 的大作中提到】
: 以下是摘自Perelman的Wikipedia条目中关于庞加莱猜想验证过程的介绍。第二部分是
: 朱熹平的工作。我个人猜测Perelman隐退数学界的动机之一是这个事件:他觉得数学界
: 的人太不纯粹了。
: Verification
: Since 2003, Perelman's program has attracted increasing attention from the
: mathematical community. In April 2003, he accepted an invitation to visit
: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, Stony Brook
: University, Columbia University and New York University, where he gave a
: series of talks on his work.[18]
: Three independent groups of scholars have verified that Perelman's papers

1 (共1页)
进入Mathematics版参与讨论
相关主题
有没有牛牛简单介绍一下S.Smale最近五十年数学界激动人心的时刻
A new proof of Poincare conjecture陶哲轩对望月新一的证明很不爽 (转载)
数论最容易诞生明星看看USA Today,曹朱被丘这么一闹,都成笑话了
为什么Tao在张益唐这个事件中象个局外人佩雷尔曼获奖
在perelman破解Poincare Conjecture事件中,曹/朱 有无抄袭?不要拿田是华人来说事。
who understands Perelman's work?丘成桐的"封顶"骗局基本落幕.
看着tao和ben green的online seminar讨论的那么辛苦,老张为什么不去解释(指点)一下?请大家推荐数学方面的书籍
Morgan的ICM发言Christodoulou and Hamilton Receive 2011 Shaw Prize
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: perelman话题: proof话题: university话题: conjecture