由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Military版 - 美国绝大多数科学家believe in god or higher power
相关主题
进化论是假说吧贫穷 = 宗教(图)
lubbock12,现在一年毕业13000生物博士了这次朝鲜还是做了很大让步
实话说当年看懂了“达芬奇密码”的人举手中国价值观输出了,欧巴马
这个美女是在芝加哥哪里happy?老印还是会自我陶醉, 说自己"再一次在美国释放了软实力"
关于谷歌创始人Brin批评微软的话是不是人类越进化,鸡鸡越小 (转载)
The third day of creation六四”的被利用价值终于被榨干了—维基泄密:天安门广场没有流血!(ZT)
宋鸿兵和郎咸平只懂经济,所以永远都是痛心疾首派中国人在Evolution上的一个需要改进之处 (转载)
世界最幸福国家:美国未进前十 中国榜都没上ZZ (转载)奥巴马支持率首度跌破40%
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: god话题: scientists话题: man话题: gallup话题: evolution
进入Military版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
g**********1
发帖数: 491
1
In the table below, the full wording of Gallup's question 1 is, "Humans were
created pretty much in their present form about 10 000 years ago." The
difference between scientists and other Americans is striking. Scientists
also respond quite differently to the third question, "Man evolved over
millions of years from less developed forms. God had no part in this process
." But scientists' responses to Gallup's "theistic evolution" question—"Man
evolved over millions of years from less developed forms of life, but God
guided the process, including the creation of Man"—directly mirrors that of
the general public. The "middle ground" is apparently equally attractive to
scientists as it is to the general public.
GALLUP EVOLUTION QUESTIONS
Question Scientists Public
1. Special Creation, 10 000 years 5% 46%
2. Evolution, God Guided 40% 40%
3. Evolution, God had no part 55% 9%
http://ncse.com/rncse/18/2/do-scientists-really-reject-god
Title: Do Scientists Really Reject God?: New Poll Contradicts Earlier Ones
Author(s): Eugenie C Scott
NCSE Executive Director
Volume: 18
Issue: 2
Year: 1998
Date: March–April
Page(s): 24–25
V*U
发帖数: 2226
2
One world one China One mitbbs One Worldnews.
http://www.mitbbs.com/bbsdoc/WorldNews.html

were
process
Man
of
to

【在 g**********1 的大作中提到】
: In the table below, the full wording of Gallup's question 1 is, "Humans were
: created pretty much in their present form about 10 000 years ago." The
: difference between scientists and other Americans is striking. Scientists
: also respond quite differently to the third question, "Man evolved over
: millions of years from less developed forms. God had no part in this process
: ." But scientists' responses to Gallup's "theistic evolution" question—"Man
: evolved over millions of years from less developed forms of life, but God
: guided the process, including the creation of Man"—directly mirrors that of
: the general public. The "middle ground" is apparently equally attractive to
: scientists as it is to the general public.

N*******d
发帖数: 5641
3
55%的scientist认为人是进化来的,并且跟god无关,怎么你说大部分科学家信god呢?

were
process
Man
of
to

【在 g**********1 的大作中提到】
: In the table below, the full wording of Gallup's question 1 is, "Humans were
: created pretty much in their present form about 10 000 years ago." The
: difference between scientists and other Americans is striking. Scientists
: also respond quite differently to the third question, "Man evolved over
: millions of years from less developed forms. God had no part in this process
: ." But scientists' responses to Gallup's "theistic evolution" question—"Man
: evolved over millions of years from less developed forms of life, but God
: guided the process, including the creation of Man"—directly mirrors that of
: the general public. The "middle ground" is apparently equally attractive to
: scientists as it is to the general public.

N*******d
发帖数: 5641
4
另有40%的科学家认为人是进化来,god guided,这个也不能算believe in god
真正believe in god的科学家只有5%

【在 N*******d 的大作中提到】
: 55%的scientist认为人是进化来的,并且跟god无关,怎么你说大部分科学家信god呢?
:
: were
: process
: Man
: of
: to

1 (共1页)
进入Military版参与讨论
相关主题
奥巴马支持率首度跌破40%关于谷歌创始人Brin批评微软的话
GE南车合资公司投产 称竞标美国高铁项目未受影响The third day of creation
Bernstein原著和方舟子剽窃文的对应分析ZT宋鸿兵和郎咸平只懂经济,所以永远都是痛心疾首派
现在的美国是不是成了基督教原教旨世界最幸福国家:美国未进前十 中国榜都没上ZZ (转载)
进化论是假说吧贫穷 = 宗教(图)
lubbock12,现在一年毕业13000生物博士了这次朝鲜还是做了很大让步
实话说当年看懂了“达芬奇密码”的人举手中国价值观输出了,欧巴马
这个美女是在芝加哥哪里happy?老印还是会自我陶醉, 说自己"再一次在美国释放了软实力"
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: god话题: scientists话题: man话题: gallup话题: evolution