h******a
发帖数: 2195 | |
J********a
发帖数: 5208 | 2 惨
【在 h******a 的大作中提到】
: 从下午烧到晚上啊
|
n*******n
发帖数: 7628 | 3 这个楼可以直接拆掉了
关心的是这200多户人家今后的出路是哪里
政府出钱拆迁然后安排到郊区的动迁基地去咯 |
o******t
发帖数: 1144 | |
w********r
发帖数: 14958 | 5 怎么能从顶烧到根？
中国楼房难道不是防火材料造的吗？ |
k*****r
发帖数: 21039 | 6 have mercy, dear god.
【在 h******a 的大作中提到】
: 从下午烧到晚上啊
|
n***i
发帖数: 5479 | |
w********r
发帖数: 14958 | 8 那一大瓢水，还不把搂轰塌了
【在 n***i 的大作中提到】
: 要是来个水轰-5投放水或灭火剂会不会效果好些？
|
d*****g
发帖数: 4364 | 9 马勒隔壁的，怎么整栋楼每个房间都有火？
是不是有人纵火？
【在 h******a 的大作中提到】
: 从下午烧到晚上啊
|
s*******d
发帖数: 3991 | 10 第二副照片，左边已经有消防水柱从边上的高楼喷过来了，
可惜右边没有楼了 |
|
|
G*******m
发帖数: 16326 | 11 我看故意的概率超过95%
按照正常上海人的办事效率，如果不是故意的，肯定不会是这样的结果。
不是故意的话（5%的可能性），还是赶快把陈良宇请回来吧。 |
s****z
发帖数: 1501 | 12 看这个烧法
怎么觉得起火那层以上
都没有活口了啊
【在 J********a 的大作中提到】
: 惨
|
y****e
发帖数: 23939 | 13 中国的楼还是造得结实啊，世贸大厦这么烧一下，就自己塌了 |
h***e
发帖数: 20195 | 14 肯定是电线着火了
【在 h******a 的大作中提到】
: 从下午烧到晚上啊
|
y****e
发帖数: 23939 | 15 装修材料大多易燃
【在 w********r 的大作中提到】
: 怎么能从顶烧到根？
: 中国楼房难道不是防火材料造的吗？
|
s*****r
发帖数: 43070 | 16 世贸是钢结构，火一烤就变形了。
【在 y****e 的大作中提到】
: 中国的楼还是造得结实啊，世贸大厦这么烧一下，就自己塌了
|
w*********s
发帖数: 2136 | |
w*********s
发帖数: 2136 | 18 Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation
here are only two events known to cause ground-hugging pyroclastic flows (
pictured above).
1. A volcanic eruption
2. A thermo nuclear detonation
by “Dennis”
All research provided by:
www.drjudywood.com and http://911u.org/
On the morning of September 11th, 2001, we were told a fairy tale. That wide
body jets flew into the twin towers and completely destroyed them. Let me
repeat that: Passenger planes (large hollow aluminum tubes) flew into
industrial steel, marble and concrete sky scrapers, and caused them to turn
into a pile of dust. And the worst part about this fairy tale is that we,
the American people believed it. Now, nine years later, it’s time to wake
up from your slumber and take a good hard look at what did and did not
happen on that fateful day. The conventional explanation we were provided,
by government and media, for a top-down highly destructive gravitational
collapse, in near-free-fall times, is physically impossible, and is thus
about as worthy of discussion as is the belief that the Earth is flat.
FICTION: Passenger jets flew into the Twin Towers, and the burning jet fuel
caused them to collapse.
FACT: The Twin Towers did not collapse. They suffered a mid-air
pulverization due to an extreme unconventional energy source that caused the
initial upward trajectory of so much of the towers’ mass during the ‘
collapses’ as (supposedly only) gravity was pulling them down.
FICTION: The burning jet fuel melted all of the steel beams causing the
buildings to collapse directly onto their own footprint.
FACT: 80% of each of the towers 50 million ton mass NEVER hit the ground.
The steel did not melt, but turned into nano-dust. Pulverization + Molecular
Dissociation = Ground Zero Evidence. When matter is elevated to
temperatures hotter than the surface of the Sun, molecular dissociation
results. Molecular Dissociation (MD) is easy to understand once we realize
that there are four (4) states of matter: solid, liquid, gas, and plasma.
Just as ice has trouble surviving in water or steam, molecules have trouble
surviving in plasma, which is highly energetic (ie, extremely hot). When
molecules dissociate, they leave behind loose atoms and fragments of
molecules. In other words, extremely small particles. In this sense, it is
correct to think of molecular dissociation as disintegration.
What do these two pictures have in common? They both represent a highly
unconventional destructive release of energy, with temperatures much hotter
than the sun.
So once we confirm evidence of widespread molecular dissociation having
occurred at Ground Zero in New York City, we have a very strong indication
that only exotic, unconventional weaponry could have released that much
extremely — unimaginably — high intensity energy which suddenly appeared
just as the towers disintegrated from top to bottom. This understanding
means we cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on
thermite/thermate/super thermate and “controlled demolition” any more than
we can blame it on “jet fuel” or “box cutters”.
In a “pancake collapse” the rubble pile should be at least 1/8 of the
original building height (12.5%). The actual rubble pile was no more than 2%
of the original building height. Both towers went “poof.”
So where did these 110 story tall 50 million ton sky scrapers go?
They were turned into nano-dust and 80% of the “dust” floated off into the
atmosphere.
From left to right: A huge steel beam from the south tower falters, turns to
“dust” and blows away.
Now that we’ve scientifically proven that only exotic, unconventional
weaponry could have released that much extremely — unimaginably — high
intensity energy to cause the pulverization and molecular dissociation of
these buildings, let’s look at some of the other unexplainable anomalies..
1400 VEHICLES melted NEAR WTC
All of these cars have unexplainable similar damage: Paint gone, instant
rusting, and all of their door handles and engine blocks are missing!
A squad car on FDR drive with wilted doors, burned paint, instant rust and
no door handles or engine block.
Strange fires appear to be attracted to the engine blocks, while the gas
tanks and nearby paper are not affected.
Buildings a few blocks away,had mysterious holes in the windows, and the
front marble façade is completely gone, but no other damage.
Why doesn’t the paper burn?
For months we witnessed trucks coming and going from Ground Zero and the
media told us they were hauling away the steel. What steel? There was very
little steel left in the rubble because it had been pulverized into nano-
dust. So what were these trucks really hauling back and forth? Dirt! They
hauled in dirt, spread it all over Ground Zero, then scooped it up and
hauled it away, and this went on for years. Didn’t they do that at
Chernobyl? Yes they did!
So now you know what didn’t cause the buildings to “vanish.” Planes, jet
fuel and thermite are irrelevant. So what kind of unconventional energy
could have caused the Twin Towers to turn to dust? A fissionless fusion
thermo nuclear event? Direct Energy Weapons? HAARP? A scaled up weaponized
version of The Hutchison Effect? The investigation continues……… |
y*****n
发帖数: 11251 | 19 代表了强拆技术的最新潮流。。。
【在 h******a 的大作中提到】
: 从下午烧到晚上啊
|
p******d
发帖数: 3737 | |
|
|
e*******7
发帖数: 2169 | 21 是不是哪开发商故意的，省了拆迁了
【在 G*******m 的大作中提到】
: 我看故意的概率超过95%
: 按照正常上海人的办事效率，如果不是故意的，肯定不会是这样的结果。
: 不是故意的话（5%的可能性），还是赶快把陈良宇请回来吧。
|
v****0
发帖数: 1887 | 22 水泥一样怕火
耐高温能力更差
【在 s*****r 的大作中提到】
: 世贸是钢结构，火一烤就变形了。
|
d***y
发帖数: 2567 | |
b*w
发帖数: 14917 | 24 脚手架上的绿色尼龙网，很容易燃烧
【在 w********r 的大作中提到】
: 怎么能从顶烧到根？
: 中国楼房难道不是防火材料造的吗？
|
W****C
发帖数: 1937 | 25 可以提高多少ＧＤＰ？
我记得最近有新闻说要在上海建比金茂还高的居民楼， 这下估计要泡汤。。。 |
