t*****a
发帖数: 1002 | 1 前面人说的没有物理证据就定罪了
wiki一下还真是，没有证据，只凭
1 死者丈夫有外遇
2 外遇说男的在案件(12月中)发生前(12月初）说过他丧妻而且马上要过丧妻后的第一
个圣诞节
就判了死刑，很草菅人命啊，有外遇的骗小三说自己丧妻也很正常嘛。可能是80%的可
能是他干的，也不能肯定啊。 | c******k
发帖数: 8998 | 2 被抓的时候带了大量现金、4个手机、露营器材，可能是打算逃跑。 | t*****a
发帖数: 1002 | 3 那也只是很可能啊
说不定是发现外遇爆光，预见自己要被冤枉，被吓的呢
说不定是要出国泡妞呢
【在 c******k 的大作中提到】
: 被抓的时候带了大量现金、4个手机、露营器材，可能是打算逃跑。
| s**i
发帖数: 4448 | 4 The trial of Scott Peterson for the murders of his wife Laci and their
unborn child Conner is a classic example of a prosecution based almost
solely on circumstantial evidence, rather than direct evidence.
Circumstantial evidence is evidence which may allow a judge or jury to
deduce a certain fact from other facts which can be proven. In some cases,
there can be some evidence that can not be proven directly, such as with an
eye-witness.
In these cases, the prosecution will attempt to provide evidence of the
circumstances from which the jury can logically deduct, or reasonably infer,
the fact that cannot be proven directly. The prosecutor believes the fact
can be proven by the evidence of the circumstances or "circumstantial"
evidence.
In other words, in these cases it is up to the prosecutors to show through a
set of circumstances that their theory of what took place is the only
logical deduction -- that the circumstances can be explained by no other
theory.
Conversely, in circumstantial evidence cases, it is the job of the defense
to show that the same circumstances could be explained by an alternative
theory. In order to avoid a conviction, all a defense attorney has to do is
put enough doubt into one juror's mind that the prosecution's explanation of
the circumstances is flawed.
No Direct Evidence in Peterson Case
In the Scott Peterson trial, there is very little, if any, direct evidence
connecting Peterson to the murder of his wife and unborn child. Therefore,
the prosecution is attempting to show that the circumstances surrounding her
death and the disposal of her body can be linked to only her husband.
But defense attorney Mark Geragos has apparently made great progress in
shooting down or offering other explanations for the same evidence. For
example, in the sixth week of the trial -- which is expected to last for
months -- Geragos was able to debunk two key pieces of evidence that support
the prosecution theory that the fertilizer salesman dumped his wife's body
in San Francisco Bay.
The two pieces of evidence were homemade anchors Peterson allegedly used to
sink the body of his wife and a hair from his boat that is consistent with
her DNA. Under cross-examination, Geragos was able to get police
investigator Henry "Dodge" Hendee to acknowledged to jurors that the
prosecution's own expert witness had determined that a water pitcher found
in Scott's warehouse could not have been used to make a cement boat anchor
found in his boat.
Alternative Theories for the Same Circumstances
Earlier, photos presented by Hendee and questions from prosecutors tried to
give the jury the impression that Peterson had used the water pitcher to
mold five boat anchors -- four of which were missing.
One of the few pieces of evidence the prosecution does have is a six-inch
dark hair found on a pair of pliers in Peterson's boat. Geragos showed
Hendee two police photos taken in the warehouse, one showing a camouflage
jacket in a duffle bag and another, showing it resting inside the boat.
Under Geragos' questioning, Hendee said the hair and pliers were collected
as evidence after a crime scene technician took the second photo (with the
jacket in the boat). The line of questioning from Geragos boosts the defense
theory that the hair may have been transferred from Laci Peterson's head to
her husband's coat to pliers in the boat without her ever being inside the
boat.
As with all circumstantial evidences cases, as the Scott Peterson trial
progresses, Geragos will continue to offer alternative explanations for each
piece of the prosecution's case, in hopes of placing a reasonable doubt in
at least one juror's mind. | w***t
发帖数: 8175 | | M*****n
发帖数: 16729 | | d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 7 关键不是老黑
辛普森比他证据确凿的多，但是雇佣了好律师，以及华人侦探李昌钰
【在 t*****a 的大作中提到】
: 前面人说的没有物理证据就定罪了
: wiki一下还真是，没有证据，只凭
: 1 死者丈夫有外遇
: 2 外遇说男的在案件(12月中)发生前(12月初）说过他丧妻而且马上要过丧妻后的第一
: 个圣诞节
: 就判了死刑，很草菅人命啊，有外遇的骗小三说自己丧妻也很正常嘛。可能是80%的可
: 能是他干的，也不能肯定啊。
| l*********1
发帖数: 772 | 8 Well, that was decided by the Jury. If as a DA you can convinced the Jury
then you got it. The case has a lot of circumstantial evidences, although
no direct evidences. | s**i
发帖数: 4448 | 9 他老婆失踪以后他在家加了两个porn cable channel。买过水泥浇注了几个混凝土锚，
控方说是用来沉laci的。老婆失踪前后他出过海。
唯一物理证据，船上一把钳子上有他老婆的头发，被告律师说是他带过去的。
反正没有直接物理证据。
尸体冲上海岸已经高度腐败，无法确定死因。头部不在了。 | t*****a
发帖数: 1002 | 10 我觉得这些都说的过去啊，99%是他杀的，但我觉得不合适，属于陪审团民意杀人
【在 s**i 的大作中提到】
: 他老婆失踪以后他在家加了两个porn cable channel。买过水泥浇注了几个混凝土锚，
: 控方说是用来沉laci的。老婆失踪前后他出过海。
: 唯一物理证据，船上一把钳子上有他老婆的头发，被告律师说是他带过去的。
: 反正没有直接物理证据。
: 尸体冲上海岸已经高度腐败，无法确定死因。头部不在了。
| s**i
发帖数: 4448 | 11 辛案主要是控方无能。
【在 d******a 的大作中提到】
: 关键不是老黑
: 辛普森比他证据确凿的多，但是雇佣了好律师，以及华人侦探李昌钰
| s**i
发帖数: 4448 | |
|
