u***r
发帖数: 4825 | 1 MIT professor's comments about Obamacare creates stir
http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/mit-professors-comments-about-oba
Jonathan Gruber was an intellectual architect of Obamacare, but at a
conference last year he said the law was written to hide crucial details
from an American public too dumb to understand. |
u***r
发帖数: 4825 | 2 The Jonathan Gruber Controversy and Washington’s Dirty Little Secret
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/13/upshot/the-jonathan-gruber-co |
u***r
发帖数: 4825 | 3 有媒体甚至说共和党将来可能以这个为工具力图反转ObamaCare |
I******I
发帖数: 14241 | 4 左逼终于说实话了，这些鸡巴小人把法律条文写的无比繁琐，就是为了愚弄屁民，自己
从中获利。
妈的美国宪法，一共也没多长，写得清清楚楚，真是君子坦荡荡，小人藏鸡鸡。 |
x****u
发帖数: 12955 | 5 He's right. As demonstrated by how the public reacted.
This is just like software are written to hide crucial details from users
too dumb to understand how the software works. |
m********8
发帖数: 7463 | 6 此言甚善
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
: He's right. As demonstrated by how the public reacted.
: This is just like software are written to hide crucial details from users
: too dumb to understand how the software works.
|
l********g
发帖数: 6760 | 7 你是聪明人，你来说说obamacare主要说了些啥？
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
: He's right. As demonstrated by how the public reacted.
: This is just like software are written to hide crucial details from users
: too dumb to understand how the software works.
|
u***r
发帖数: 4825 | 8 That would be Jonathan Gruber, an M.I.T. health economist who helped design
the Massachusetts health reforms on which Obamacare was based and then
advised the Obama administration on that program’s design.
At an academic panel in 2013, he said that:
“this bill was written in a tortured way to make sure” the Congressional
Budget Office “did not score the mandate as taxes.”
He also said that:
“lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” and added, "Call it
the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was
really, really critical to getting the thing to pass.” |
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 9 obamacare主要说用中产阶级的钱买穷人的健康
【在 l********g 的大作中提到】
: 你是聪明人，你来说说obamacare主要说了些啥？
|
u***r
发帖数: 4825 | 10 follow up:
共和党说这老哥 was paid almost $400,000 by this administration
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/11/14/ |
u***r
发帖数: 4825 | 11 follow up:
更多的video出来了，这位经济学家之前说过的话被翻出来不少：
“stupidity of the American voter.”
“If you have a law that makes explicit that healthy people pay in and sick
people get money, it wouldn’t have passed,” Gruber said in a video from
2013. “Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage and, basically,
call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever. But basically that
was really critical to getting the thing to pass.”
“It’s a very clever, you know, basic exploitation of the lack of economic
understanding of the American voter.” |
