g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 1 http://advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/06/10/Prop_8_Attorneys_Preview_Closing_Argument_Strategy/
我方律师在做最后的准备反驳
Prop. 8 proponents’ primary arguments:
1) marriage was intended for the purposes of procreation,
2) it has always been between a man and a woman,
3) changes in marriage laws are better handled via the political process,
4) gays and lesbians in California are already afforded domestic
partnership rights, and that allowing gays to marry would endanger
heterosexual marriages. | g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 2 关于新提名大法官ELENA KAGAN：
KAGAN 曾说过“There is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage
.” 有人理解为这就是她对宪法的解释，也有人说她只是在陈述现存法律，与她将来
怎么判无关。Ted Olson和David Boies同意后者,认为大法院的EQUATION没有变，我们
还是能争取到5：4的判决。 | g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 3 如果FEDERAL JUDGE判我们赢了，律师希望法官能马上允许同性伴侣在加州结婚。如果
法官暂不执行判决，（对方要上诉的话），希望上诉法庭能很快审理案件。 |
|
