f********t
发帖数: 6999 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: swjtuer (swjtuer), 信区: Military
标 题: 中国试验500kimh的超级高速列车：美国网民炸锅了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Dec 30 22:32:51 2011, 美东)
us • Tampa, Florida • 2 days 10 hrs ago
Why invest money in your own infrastructure and new technologies?, screw
improving the quality of life for your citizens when you can spend trillions
on foolish wars and give the rest away to undeserving countries, wake up
America, take your #$%$ country back!!!!
为什么把钱投资在你们自己的基础建设和新技术开发上？（原文如此，是不是少了个
not？）改善你们的公民的生活质量，当你可以把大量地钱财耗费在愚蠢的战争上并将
剩下的钱给那些无关的国家。醒醒吧美国人，恢复你#$%$ 的国家！（#$%$是富裕么？）
Thomas 2 days 12 hrs ago
They're developing trains that go 375mph while we can barely keep Amtrak
operating, much less on time. Hmmmm.
他们研制了能达到375英里/小时的火车，我们却勉强维持美国铁路公司的运作。时间少
得多。嗯……
Mik S • Cleveland, Ohio • 2 days 10 hrs ago
could you imagine new york to la in like 15 hrs amazing
你能想象纽约到洛杉矶需要15个小时么？真惊人。
•
EL 2 days 9 hrs ago
I rode twice on the Chinese high speed train for about 1 hour each time an
speed up to 200 miles per hour, at a cost of about $20. I enjoyed it. It was
better than air travel, more room and without the security hassle.
I wish it would be available in our country. Unfortunately, it will not and
not because we are not smart enough, it's because our political system,
inefficient and corrupted.
我坐过两次中国的高铁，每次1个小时左右，速度有200英里每小时，票价大约20美元。
很舒服。比飞机好，空间大，而且没有安全问题。
我希望我们国家也能有高铁，可惜没这个希望。不是因为我们不够聪明，而是因为我们
的政治体制问题，低效而且腐败。
John A • Newark, New Jersey • 2 days 11 hrs ago
I've ridden the HSR from Putian to Xiamen, China. Business Class seat $6.00
usd. Smooth as glass, quiet. Our US trains systems are stone age in
comparison and ridiculously over priced.
我做过莆田到厦门的动车组，商务座要6美元。像滑动在玻璃上一样顺畅，安静。与此
相比，我们美国的铁路系统好似在石器时代，而且价格高得离谱。
2012 Armageddon 2 days 10 hrs ago
Why on earth would the U.S. build something that is efficient and fast? The
U.S. will jump on technology that would cost twice as much and three times
longer to build. The U.S. has the most debt in the history of mankind, you
don't get that title by being efficient.
到底为什么美国要建造这种高效快速的东西？美国要提升技术的话，需要付出两倍的造
价和三倍的时间。而美国现在是人类历史上负债最多的国家。不能因为高效就这么做。
Dahong Palay 2 days 8 hrs ago
Speed trains will ruin the airline industry, that's the reason why US is
hesitant to build high speed trains. Big corporations rules in this country.
If high speed train will travel from San Francisco to Los Angeles in a
matter of two hours and airplane about an hour plus an extra hour of staying
at the airport, train is more practical with a sightseeing view....agree???
高铁会毁掉航空业。这就是美国迟迟不肯建造高铁的缘故。这个国家的大公司规则。如
果高铁从旧金山到洛杉矶只要两小时而飞机要一小时并且还要多花一小时等在机场里，
火车还可以看风景……对吧？
•
CHARLES L • Nashville, Tennessee • 2 days 2 hrs ago
why don't we have china build us a train, the make evereything else that's
sold in this country.
为啥不让中国来帮我们造铁路呢。他们制造了一切然后出售给这个国家。
•
QVC 2 days 10 hrs ago
I was just in Japan and took its trains. The Japanese trains were amazing;
clean, efficient, and on time (I have an atomic watch and the trains run
with in 1-2 seconds). I have also ridden Chinese mag-lev trains...wow!
我曾坐过日本的火车，很让人惊讶。干净，高效，而且准点（我有个原子表，列车运行
差1~2秒）。我也坐过中国的磁悬浮……WOW！
•
Ahmad • Nantong, China • 2 days 11 hrs ago
I am enjoying traveling in one of those trains and it is totally amazing and
luxury and feels like you are traveling in a spaceship :-)
我很喜欢乘坐这些列车，很神奇而且舒适，就像在宇宙飞船中旅行一样：-）
ScubaGuyVic • Miami, Florida • 2 days 9 hrs ago
It is so painfully obvious that we are on the fast track "backwards" !!
想到我们在高速运输上落后了，我就好伤心！！
PaulN • Fresno, California • 2 days 6 hrs ago
China is the next super power unless we start investing in new technology
and take risks like them!
中国是下一个超级大国，除非我们开始投资新技术并像他们那样承担风险！
CC • Elmhurst, Illinois • 2 days 12 hrs ago
Safety is obviously important, but seriously, the article implies that China
is suffering from unique problems all due to fast rail service. We actually
have lots of train collisions in the U.S. (more than China) with our slow
outdated trains.
安全显然很重要，但是严肃地说，这篇文章说到中国受到了高铁特殊问题的伤害。我们
美国其实也有很多列车相撞事件（比中国多），即使我们是又慢又晚点的火车。 | i*****d
发帖数: 178 | 2 估计这些人不知道温涌事故吧。
trillions
【在 f********t 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: swjtuer (swjtuer), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 中国试验500kimh的超级高速列车：美国网民炸锅了
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Dec 30 22:32:51 2011, 美东)
: us • Tampa, Florida • 2 days 10 hrs ago
: Why invest money in your own infrastructure and new technologies?, screw
: improving the quality of life for your citizens when you can spend trillions
: on foolish wars and give the rest away to undeserving countries, wake up
: America, take your #$%$ country back!!!!
: 为什么把钱投资在你们自己的基础建设和新技术开发上？（原文如此，是不是少了个
| s*******n
发帖数: 12995 | 3 这个作者很天真，把高铁当做别家小孩的新玩具。高铁只适合人口稠密的地区，即便这
样，是世界上也只有一条线是盈利的。 | G******t
发帖数: 1782 | 4 I think it is good to have a diversified portfolio of
options for transportation. The airline-dependent US
transportation system is too vulnerable to terrorist
attacks and weather. Besides, lack of hi-speed railway
system was probably a result of heavy lobbying by the
airline industry as well.
http://news.yahoo.com/china-tests-500-km-h-super-high-speed-060
【在 s*******n 的大作中提到】
: 这个作者很天真，把高铁当做别家小孩的新玩具。高铁只适合人口稠密的地区，即便这
: 样，是世界上也只有一条线是盈利的。
| w***5
发帖数: 8282 | 5 HSR can be suitable in the east coast, but it will be costly to build. | G******t
发帖数: 1782 | 6 城际高铁也不错。原来联邦政府选的一些试点，譬如
TPA<-->MCO
LAX<-->SFO
等等搞高铁其实都也是不错的。
【在 w***5 的大作中提到】
: HSR can be suitable in the east coast, but it will be costly to build.
|
|
