由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - A Koran, and Free Speech, In Flames
相关主题
U.S. ‘Worried’ Muslims Might Freak Out Over ‘Zero Dark Thirty’Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad
一首有关伊斯兰教的诗--a poem about IslamThe Muslim Game:
历史的轮回:穆斯林西征 & 十字军东征Trump到底说啥了
科威特学川总ban了5个穆斯林国家好不容易看见一篇两边都批的好文
Two American Soldiers Die in Shooting at Afghan BaseWhy Islam is Worse Than Nazism (转载)
为什么穆斯林仇恨我们?当穆斯林被告知说吃东西要付钱,愤怒了
巴拉克-侯赛因-奥巴马的穆斯林童年丹麦人民党呼吁停止接收穆斯林移民
Combating what the comics are calling Islamophobia?消除Islamophobia,是穆斯林自己的责任
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: koran话题: obama话题: jones话题: burning话题: speech
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
by Robert Spencer
04/05/2011
Enraged over the burning of a Koran in Florida, Muslims have murdered about
20 people in Afghanistan and five in Pakistan—none of whom ever burned a
Koran or had any acquaintance with the men who did.
These killers are monstrous. They have assassinated innocent people for
something that they couldn't conceivably have had anything to do with. And
yet instead of calling them monstrous and demanding that Islamic leaders
stop inciting and approving of such behavior, Western government and media
elites are blaming not the murderers and rioters, but the man behind the
Koran-burning, the notorious Christian fundamentalist pastor Terry Jones.
Thus Guardian editor Matt Seaton explained that Jones was to blame because
his Koran-burning was “done knowingly involving reckless endangerment, and
quite possibly wishing for this kind of bad result.” This assumed that the
Muslims who were rioting and killing over the burning of a book half a
world away had no control over their reactions, and thus could not be held
accountable for them: For enlightened leftists such as Seaton, it is the
West's responsibility to make sure the Islamic world behaves in a civilized
manner. How paternalistic and ethnocentric of those most committed to
multiculturalism.
Barack Obama reacted the same way when Jones first threatened to burn a
Koran last year. He said that "this stunt that he is talking about pulling
could greatly endanger our young men and women who are in uniform. Look,
this is a recruitment bonanza for al-Qaeda. You could have serious violence
in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan."
Obama found the burning of the Koran, and the burning of any book,
distasteful, as do I. But that was why he should have stood up for Terry
Jones. Speech that is inoffensive needs no protection, and those in power
can all too easily use “hate speech” codes to restrict speech they find
politically inconvenient or challenging. Obama could have said: "While I
disapprove of this Koran-burning, in America we believe that freedom of
expression is a fundamental bulwark against tyranny and the hallmark of a
truly free society, and it requires us to put up with things we don't like
without responding with violence."
He could, in short, have used Jones’ barbecued Koran as a teaching tool to
demonstrate why free societies are preferable to sharia states. But instead
, Obama and the media are effectively reinforcing the principle that violent
intimidation works: They knew that somewhere in the world Muslims were
going to behave like rabid dogs because of the burned Koran, and instead of
telling them to grow up and act like civilized people, they are demanding
that free people change the way they behave to adjust to this case of rabies.
Obama could and should be telling these rioting Afghans and Pakistanis, and
those who are defending them, to realize that if someone burns a Koran in
Florida, it doesn't harm them, or the Koran, or Allah, or Muhammad. He
could and should tell them that to respond with irrational violence against
people who are not involved with the burning (or even against the people who
are involved with it) is just savagery.
People like Obama and Seaton have forgotten, if they ever knew, that one's
response to someone else's provocative action is entirely one's own
responsibility. If you do something that offends me, I am under no
obligation to kill you, or to run to the United Nations to try to get laws
passed that will silence you. I am free to ignore you, or laugh at you, or
to respond with charity, or any number of reactions.
Everyone in the world is so busy condemning Terry Jones that they have
forgotten about freedom of expression, and why it is so important to
reinforce even when we find the expression detestable—indeed, especially in
such cases. And so, if we continue down this path, one thing is certain:
That which is not understood or valued will not be protected, and so it will
be lost.
Those who censor themselves today to keep from offending Muslims may wish in
the not-too-distant future that they had stood up more robustly for the
freedom of speech when it was threatened. But by then, there might be no
chance for them to get that word out.
Mr. Spencer is director of Jihad Watch and author of The Politically
Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), The Truth About Muhammad,
Stealth Jihad and The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran (all from
Regnery-a HUMAN EVENTS sister company).
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
消除Islamophobia,是穆斯林自己的责任Two American Soldiers Die in Shooting at Afghan Base
London bombing shows danger of Islamification in Britain and Europe. Is the US next?为什么穆斯林仇恨我们?
Pakistan retaliation leaves NATO drivers in limbo巴拉克-侯赛因-奥巴马的穆斯林童年
白人左派思潮是西方自杀的毒药Combating what the comics are calling Islamophobia?
U.S. ‘Worried’ Muslims Might Freak Out Over ‘Zero Dark Thirty’Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad
一首有关伊斯兰教的诗--a poem about IslamThe Muslim Game:
历史的轮回:穆斯林西征 & 十字军东征Trump到底说啥了
科威特学川总ban了5个穆斯林国家好不容易看见一篇两边都批的好文
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: koran话题: obama话题: jones话题: burning话题: speech