l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 Argentina says the 'vultures' circling overhead have multiplied, and they're
asking for billions
Linette Lopez
Mar. 3, 2015, 3:23 PM
Investors in Argentina known as "me-too" bondholders have filed $6-$8
billion worth of claims for more of the country's money to US Judge Thomas
Griesa, says Argentine Economy Minister Axel Kicillof.
And as far as Kicillof is concerned, those investors won't get a dime more
than what he believes they are owed.
"Griesa asked that all those filing claims go to court and they're there now
. The news ... what there is to recount, is that those who showed up are
also vultures, and many of those who filed a claim initially showed up, like
Paul Singer." Kicillof said in a radio interview in Argentina. "What this
tells us is that this is all a trap. Eighty-five percent of those who've
made claims in this round are vulture funds."
Paul SingerWikimedia
The "me too" bondholders are following the lead of a hedge fund manager who
is now notorious in Argentina, Paul Singer.
Singer bought Argentine debt after the country's last massive default in
2002. Then, instead of taking the opportunity to restructure that debt in
2005 and 2010, he and a few others (known collectively as NML) insisted on
getting paid 100 cents on the dollar. That, in Argentina, makes them "
vulture funds."
The fact that Singer got a court in Ghana to impound an Argentine naval
vessel back in 2012 didn't help matters (the International Martime Court of
the Sea made Ghana release the boat).
Singer continued suing The Republic for the over $1.3 billion he has said he
's owed, and presiding Judge Thomas Griesa sided with him. So did the US
Supreme Court, which refused to even hear Argentina's appeal.
Consequently, according to Griesa's ruling, Argentina could not pay any
bondholders if it did not also pay NML (which is what it had been trying to
do).
vulture protest argentinaReutersProtesters, holding a mock vulture, rally
against layoffs in front of the factory of U.S. automotive supplier Lear on
the outskirts of Buenos Aires July 30, 2014.
Even then, the Buenos Aires would not pay. As a result, the country went
into "selective default" last July. Because of that, the country is now also
open to claims from more investors. Judge Griesa gave them until March 2nd
to file. Argentina has until March 17th to respond — but it doesn't take a
rocket scientist to figure what they might say. In the past, all of
Argentina's talk about wanting to negotiate has been just that — talk.
"Argentine law leaves us well covered because it's very clear that the bonds
under Argentine law are our domain," Kicillof said on Tuesday. "Griesa will
try to stop creditors from being paid under Argentine law, which is
extortion and allows the vultures to tell the entire world that the country
is knocked out thanks to its bad behavior."
NML, for its part, argues that the bonds in question are under New York's
jurisdiction. It was after the entire "selective default" mess happened that
Argentina tried to bring them under Buenos Aires' jurisdiction. The
maneuver did not amuse Judge Griesa, or really anyone else.
argentina monthly economic activityOxford Economics
Nevertheless, a multibillion dollar bill is too much for the country at this
time. Inflation is high (at 40%) in Argentina, capital flight is rampant,
the country's balance of payments is off balance, and back in January there
was a shortage of tampons that almost had women protesting in the streets.
As of this fall, there was under $30 billion in Argentina's central bank.
And of course, with lawsuits like this going on, no one wants to buy
Argentine debt. A bond offering proposed last week was "suspended" after NML
cried foul.
The Wall Street banks hired to handle the bond offering sent potential
investors a warning letter saying they would not be held responsible for
anything that happened after the bonds were purchased. Basically, they were
saying: 'Once you buy these, you're on your own.'
If that sounds like it would be a really risky investment, that's because it
is. However, President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner (and Kicillof) are
supposed to leave office after this year, so some analysts believe a new
government will get Argentina back on track.
Would you take that bet? |
|
