j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | |
r**********f
发帖数: 2808 | 2 Well said. The choice is no Hillary. |
j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 3 尼玛左臂就没一个守法的么？
【在 r**********f 的大作中提到】
: Well said. The choice is no Hillary.
|
s*********r
发帖数: 9493 | |
j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 5 左臂言必称肤色种族，深入骨髓的歧视。
【在 s*********r 的大作中提到】
: 沉睡的白人终于觉醒了。赞。
|
s*********r
发帖数: 9493 | 6 你看不懂床老爷的策略：你个傻粉。
【在 j*********r 的大作中提到】
: 左臂言必称肤色种族，深入骨髓的歧视。
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 7 Joseph Riccardo
6:35 AM PDT
I read the 44 page decision by Judge Curiel. I am a legal professional with
MANY years of federal court experience, both drafting pleadings and motions
and filing them with the courts - so I know 1) how to read opinions, 2) know
HOW to find what was submitted as evidence and 3) whether or not the Judge
was even anywhere close to being accurate in making his decisions. What is
lacking in 95 percent of articles that post links to "decisions" or "
opinions" are links to the actual evidence presented to the Court by
Plaintiffs and Defendants, along with the briefs and motions filed by BOTH
sides. There ARE ways to find the evidence in this matter - everything that
was filed. I want to get to the "evidence" to see if the judge's decision
seems fair. What many do not realize is this: ANY instance of EVEN the
appearance of impropriety on the part of Judge Curiel WARRANT RECUSAL or
removal from the case - period. Curiel IS an avowed member of "La Raza," a
militant attorney group that has been outwardly pro-illegal "immigrant" and
pro-Clinton. Additionally, Curiel appointed a huge law firm to represent the
Plaintiffs in the matter - a law firm with heavy financial ties to Hillary
Clinton AND The Clinton Foundation. THOSE 2 facts alone represent enough
conflict of interest to warrant either recusal or removal from the case. To-
date, nothing has been done. Whether Judge Curiel partially rules in favor
or against Trump means nothing with respect to the open and proven bias the
Judge could have against Trump. The VERY FACT he "could be biased" based on
the above facts, warrants recusal or removal - period. Donald Trump MAY have
defrauded people. The Judge MAY be correct in his overall assessment THUS
FAR. However, his open bias warrants recusal or removal. I am NOT defending
Trump. I want to arrive at the truth of the matter. I am NOT sure that given
the clear potential for bias whether this judge is doing anyone a service
by remaining on the case. |
j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 8 我把你几个贴都转到我那个法官总结贴了
with
motions
know
Judge
【在 b********n 的大作中提到】
: Joseph Riccardo
: 6:35 AM PDT
: I read the 44 page decision by Judge Curiel. I am a legal professional with
: MANY years of federal court experience, both drafting pleadings and motions
: and filing them with the courts - so I know 1) how to read opinions, 2) know
: HOW to find what was submitted as evidence and 3) whether or not the Judge
: was even anywhere close to being accurate in making his decisions. What is
: lacking in 95 percent of articles that post links to "decisions" or "
: opinions" are links to the actual evidence presented to the Court by
: Plaintiffs and Defendants, along with the briefs and motions filed by BOTH
|
H**G
发帖数: 563 | 9 Trump is correct! It's common sense that people of color, including
Hispanics, hate Mr. Trump.
【在 j*********r 的大作中提到】
: 我把你几个贴都转到我那个法官总结贴了
:
: with
: motions
: know
: Judge
|
m********g
发帖数: 10469 | 10 甜妈，你这极左疯婆是不是老王不在你就认为自己可以猥琐欲为?
你极左疯婆子在被加州白左和老墨拿种族划分法案打肿脸是不是笑笑走开，说自己
龙虾吃多了海鲜过敏？
【在 s*********r 的大作中提到】
: 你看不懂床老爷的策略：你个傻粉。
|
j*********r
发帖数: 24733 | 11 您这位种族分子的眼里只有肤色种族，啧啧
【在 H**G 的大作中提到】
: Trump is correct! It's common sense that people of color, including
: Hispanics, hate Mr. Trump.
|
t*******d
发帖数: 12895 | |
