d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 1 不过，粪坑国家实行出生即公民也挺合理的：一般人不会跑粪坑国家
Unrestricted jus soli
Antigua and Barbuda: Guaranteed by the Constitution.[11][12]
Argentina[11]
Barbados: Guaranteed by the Constitution.[11][13] However, the Barbados
Ministry of Labour & Immigration recently proposed ending automatic
birthright citizenship.[14]
Belize[11][15]
Bolivia[11]
Brazil[11][16] (requires that the foreign parents are not working for their
country's government in Brazil by the time the child is born).
Canada[11][17]
Chad [18][19] (The choice to take Chadian citizenship, or that of the
parents is made at 18 years of age.)[20]
Chile[11][21]
Costa Rica[22] (Jus sangui requires registration with the Costa Rican
government before the age of twenty-five)
Dominica[11][23]
Ecuador[11]
El Salvador[11]
Fiji[24]
Grenada[11]
Guatemala[11]
Guyana[11]
Honduras[11]
Jamaica[11][25]
Lesotho[26]
Mexico[11][27]
Nicaragua[11]
Pakistan[28][29]
Panama[11][30]
Paraguay[11]
Peru (registration required at 18 years of age)[11]
Saint Kitts and Nevis[11]
Saint Lucia[11]
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines[11]
Tanzania[19]: Per the Tanzania Citizenship Act of 1995, "any child born
within the borders of the United Republic of Tanzania, on or after Union Day
, 26 April 1964, is granted citizenship of Tanzania, except for children of
foreign diplomats."[31]
Trinidad and Tobago [11][32]
Tuvalu[33]
United States: The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution
provides that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and
of the State wherein they reside".[34] The phrase "subject to the
jurisdiction thereof" excludes children born to foreign diplomats and
children born to enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country's
territory.[35] The concept of birthright citizenship applying to the child
born of a foreign national in the country without proper credentials has
never been formally litigated. However, it was briefly discussed in the
dissenting opinion of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).[36]
Uruguay[11][37] | f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 2 加拿大这种高福利国家，之所以还能装装笔还是靠着美国。美国一旦改了，俺打包票加
拿大一定马上也改。 |
|
