q******g
发帖数: 390 | 1 第一次中奖率最高
FY Year Odds Comment
2013 5 of 22 22%
2012 5 of 22 22%
2011 3 of 17 18%
2010 4 of 19 21%
2009 7 of 13* 54%
2008 7 of 20 35%
2007 7 of 24 29%
38/137 28%
* stimulus year
From FY 2007- 2013, the rate of successful applications is 28% (as in the
table). Given multiple applications, 38 of 84 applicants (45%) have gotten
the award. 18 were successful on first application, 14 on second, 6 on
third. Only 8 people applied 3 times (the limit) and were unsuccessful 3
times. So apply, and then apply again.
(Lower funding rates post-stimulus stem from fewer awards and more
applications, which represents a nation-wide trend.) |
p*****g
发帖数: 996 | 2 这是top50吧？
【在 q******g 的大作中提到】
: 第一次中奖率最高
: FY Year Odds Comment
: 2013 5 of 22 22%
: 2012 5 of 22 22%
: 2011 3 of 17 18%
: 2010 4 of 19 21%
: 2009 7 of 13* 54%
: 2008 7 of 20 35%
: 2007 7 of 24 29%
: 38/137 28%
|
S**********s
发帖数: 766 | 3 见过不少学校最近几年全部或者大多数AP都拿了career，排名有高也有近100名的。 |
s*********x
发帖数: 1923 | 4 好像是对的，我印象中一个排名100开外的计算机系，基本每个ap都拿了career award. |
n******g
发帖数: 662 | |
p*****g
发帖数: 996 | 6 嗯，越到排名靠后的学校对钱的要求越高。。。
而且学生完全靠不上，自己要一揽子全包了
award.
【在 s*********x 的大作中提到】
: 好像是对的，我印象中一个排名100开外的计算机系，基本每个ap都拿了career award.
|
w****y
发帖数: 2501 | |
a**********y
发帖数: 2367 | 8 这么来说应不应该第二年就上啊？是不是pre-mature? |
m****1
发帖数: 736 | 9 "From FY 2007- 2013, the rate of successful applications is 28% (as in the
table). Given multiple applications, 38 of 84 applicants (45%) have gotten
the award. 18 were successful on first application, 14 on second, 6 on
third. Only 8 people applied 3 times (the limit) and were unsuccessful 3
times."
so 84-38-8=38 people did not even applied. why? |
G****2
发帖数: 211 | 10 2009,2010,2011这三年比例太高了。 因为job market不好，AP竞争的也不错。 现在应
该形式不一样 |
