u********w
发帖数: 599 | 1 二发成功率高 is easy. learn from Murry. 130 mph first serve and 55 mph 2nd
serve.
的力量， 结果成功率出奇的高了。 以前二发也发全力，猛刷，但不知道啥原因， 容
易出界， 现在往前的力减少了， 然后球就借重力自己掉下来了。反正对手也不能轻松
的攻击我的二发，不用弄这么大力。
不可能的事情。 |
|
|
d*g
发帖数: 16592 | 3 感觉身体灵活性柔韧性啥的比murry好啊，不过好像体力不是特别好，3 set可能没问题
，好像很多5set，到最后都不成了的样子。 |
|
|
|
w******n
发帖数: 13172 | 6 Murry有点缺心眼，小德以前有点装天真，最近才好点。还是狒狒和豆子会做人
21 |
|
|
t***s
发帖数: 1877 | 8 if Verdasco win Murry in straight sets and if Federer won JMDP, no matter 2:
1 or 2:0, verdasco will advanced to semi with roger |
|
k*****i
发帖数: 61 | 9 Although Murry and Verd have the same win and lost sets under your
hypothesis, Verd beats Murray,so Verd is No.2 in this team.
game |
|
|
m****u
发帖数: 147 | 11 William vs. Henin...
Murry vs. Fed...
Champs: H & M... |
|
|
|
t***s
发帖数: 1877 | 14 He is saving rp for Murry |
|
|
m*********y
发帖数: 10616 | 16 费费只要能够长短球都来，并且左右开弓，不断的调动姆雷，让他满场飞奔，希望就来
了，毕竟murry要想跑满5盘，难度很大。 |
|
m*********y
发帖数: 10616 | 17 还有就是要猛攻murry的二发，没有看出他的二发有什么进步。 |
|
D*D
发帖数: 236 | 18 So is Federer's backhand.
Don't know how long each will last but these two factors will be critical to
this match. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f**********n
发帖数: 10757 | 30 嗯，nadal都是压反手 伺机偷袭正手的。murry打球侵略性不强，而且很不fit啊，觉得
体能很容易跨 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 10757 | 31 你说说他应该怎么才能赢FF呢？我觉得murry没有菠萝那么变态的正手，很难啊 |
|
j****r
发帖数: 192 | 32 确实不结实，不过找Murry代言应该把鞋做的格外结实，他的跑动距离肯定比一般人要
长。 |
|
j****r
发帖数: 192 | 33 这点不敢苟同，Murry不是平和，是非常不健谈。他在排名30多时已经出自传，可以说
是个非常狂妄或者说非常自信的年轻人，费费很多时候也是对他的话的回击，诸如“打
败费费比赢得整个赛事更重要”“费费和Tsonga中宁可选费费作为对手”。当然这根本
就不是问题，而且是他这两年不断进步的必要条件之一， 没有这种狂妄或者强烈的自
信，他也不大可能在网球这个个人为中心的运动中成为顶尖高手。 |
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 34 No, I said AO 2010.
Now I've decided to stick to Murray since I couldn't find a
replacement. No other player is more promising at this moment,
and I have a policy not to switch back to previous idols
(Murray lost to Federer only).
is
Murry. |
|
m***t
发帖数: 220 | 35 It seems fed's backhand has been improved. Murry attacked his BH really hard
, however, it seems Fed is not afraid of that. |
|
a*m
发帖数: 6253 | 36 play the match with only placement is what i called pusher, like murry, hehe
power |
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 38 Murray broke 3 times out of 12, while being broken 3 times out of
4. Continued lousy performance from the 1st match. |
|
F**********e
发帖数: 199 | 39 可怜的孩子
还没从打击中走出来
kennyD不愧一代衰神，跟谁谁衰 |
|
g*y
发帖数: 2354 | 40 眼镜男隔三岔五的发一次飙，这次穆雷撞上了。
kennyD，你follow穆雷这么久，statistics一大堆，究竟有没有个关于他拿首个大满贯
的预测啊？只要你说，我就信你权威哈，呵呵。 |
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 41 Well, statistically speaking only 5 guys made 2 finals but never
won 1 GS. I am not aware of anyone who made 3 finals but never
won 1 GS. So if Murray gets into another final, it's likely
he will eventually win a slam. Lendl won his first GS after he
lost 4 times in the finals.
However, the chance of him stopping here (2 finals) is also
considerable. He will then join Miloslav Mecir, Mark
Philippoussis, Cedric Pioline and Todd Martin.
So my personal estimate is as follows:
The chance of Murray w |
|
s*********d
发帖数: 2406 | 42 just wonder, how is 60% come from
I think murray may be get one in 2 years. |
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 43 I meant "there does not exist (at least not I am aware of) a
player who lost 3 or more times in finals but did not win a
single GS by the end of career."
In another word, if Murray goes into final again, statistically
speaking he is quite likely to win at least 1 GS at some point.
1) If he wins the 3rd final, he immediately wins 1 GS;
2) If he loses the 3rd final, there does not exist any player
in history in the same situation who didn't win a GS eventually. |
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 44 60% is out of complete speculation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
